Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(3): 1047-1051, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34227034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis of high-quality primary articles represents the top-quality evidence in medical literature. In this project, our aim was to assess the number and quality of COVID-related meta-analysis published since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The search included the period from January 1, 2020, when the beginning of primary articles on COVID-19, till October 31, 2020. We screened a total of 793 studies. We excluded non-meta-analytic non-COVID-19-related studies. We obtained different characteristics, and we determined the quality of reporting using the AMSTAR tool, an 11-items tool that assesses the content validity and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 538 studies were included in our assessment. The first meta-analysis included was published in March, while the last one was on the 31st of October. Upon comparing the mean AMSTAR score for meta-analysis published during each month, we found a significant difference (p < 0.001, F = 4.139), where the mean score almost steadily increased since March. CONCLUSION: The urge to publish during the COVID-19 period or any other surge in publishing should not be at the expense of quality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Systematic Reviews as Topic
2.
Perspect Psychiatr Care ; 55(3): 383-395, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30171688

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of depression and anxiety among otolaryngology outpatients at Jordan University Hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between January 2017 and February 2018. The sample included 1328 otolaryngology adult outpatients, who completed (PHQ-9) and (GAD-7) questionnaires for depression and anxiety. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: Depression and anxiety prevalence rates were 36.1% and 22.9%. The significant risk factors found for them were: age range 30 to 50 years, female sex, divorced status, smoking, alcohol drinking, asthma, family history of psychiatric illness, chronic illnesses, negative life events, secondary education, unemployment, low income, globus pharyngeus, tinnitus, and dizziness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers should have the vigilance to suspect and treat these disorders to improve patients' symptoms and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/psychology , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/complications , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Jordan/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/complications , Outpatients , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...