Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1177636, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37476614

ABSTRACT

Background: Hypoglycaemia commonly occurs in patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and dementia. The impact of dementia on hypoglycaemic events is controversial. Thus, we evaluated whether dementia increases the risk of hypoglycaemic events in older patients diagnosed with DM. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: We used the IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK) database (formerly known as the THIN database). Participants: All patients aged ≥55 years and diagnosed with DM who were prescribed at least two prescriptions of antidiabetic medication between 2000 and 2017. Two groups of patients, dementia and non-dementia group, were propensity-score (PS) matched at 1:2. The risk of hypoglycaemia was assessed through a Cox regression analysis. Main outcome and measures: Hypoglycaemic events were determined during the follow-up period by Read codes. Results: From the database, 133,664 diabetic patients were identified, with a mean follow-up of 6.11 years. During the study period, 7,762 diabetic patients diagnosed with dementia were matched with 12,944 diabetic patients who had not been diagnosed with dementia. The PS-matched Cox regression analysis showed that patients diagnosed with dementia were at a 2-fold increased risk for hypoglycaemic events compared with those not diagnosed with dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.63-2.66). A similar result was shown for a multivariable analysis using all patient data (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.22-2.32). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that diabetic patients with a diagnosis of dementia have a statistically significant higher risk of experiencing hypoglycaemia.

2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 170: 108522, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33096187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analysis investigating the incidence and prevalence of hypoglycaemia in both types of diabetes is limited. The purpose of this review is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature which investigates the incidence and prevalence of hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were searched up to October 2018. Observational studies including individuals with diabetes of all ages and reporting incidence and/or prevalence of hypoglycaemia were included. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the pooled incidence and prevalence of hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes. RESULTS: Our search strategy generated 35,007 articles, of which 72 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of hypoglycaemia ranged from 0.074% to 73.0%, comprising a total of 2,462,810 individuals with diabetes. The incidence rate of hypoglycaemia ranged from 0.072 to 42,890 episodes per 1,000 person-years: stratified by type of diabetes, it ranged from 14.5 to 42,890 episodes per 1,000 person-years and from 0.072 to 16,360 episodes per 1,000-person years in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hypoglycaemia is very common among individuals with diabetes. Further studies are needed to investigate hypoglycaemia-associated risk factors.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Prevalence , Risk Factors
3.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 75(2): 607-615, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have shown that an increased risk of dementia is associated with diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of dementia in people with diabetes in primary care in the UK. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study using the UK The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. People diagnosed with diabetes from 2000 to 2016 were included in the study. Prevalence and incidence rates of dementia were calculated annually, stratified by age and gender. RESULTS: The prevalence of dementia was 0.424% [95% CI (0.420%-0.427%)] in 2000 and 2.508% [95% CI (2.501%-2.515%)] in 2016. The highest prevalence was in those aged 85+ from 2.9% [95% CI (2.890%-2.974%)] in 2000 to 11.3% [95% CI (11.285%-11.384%)] in 2016. The incidence of dementia increased 3.7 times, from 0.181 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.179-0.183)] in 2000 to 0.683 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.679-0.686)] in 2016, respectively. Women had a higher prevalence and incidence of dementia than men 3.138% [95% CI (3.127%-3.150%)] versus 2.014% [95% CI (2.006%-2.022%)] and 0.820 [95% CI (0.814-0.826)] versus 0.576 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.571-0.580)] in 2016, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a trend of increasing prevalence and incidence of dementia in people with diabetes over the period of 2000 to 2016. This study adds to the evidence on dementia prevalence and incidence, particularly in the diabetic population.


Subject(s)
Dementia/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
J Dent Educ ; 76(10): 1384-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23066139

ABSTRACT

Over the past twenty-five years, there has been a substantial increase in work-based demands, thought to be due to an intensifying, competitive work environment. However, more recently, the question of work-life balance is increasingly attracting attention. The purpose of this study was to discover the attitudes of the next generation of dentists in Australia to parenting responsibility and work-life balance perceptions. Questionnaires on work-life balance were distributed to all fourth-year students at three dental schools in Australia. A total of 137 (76 percent) surveys were completed and returned. Most respondents indicated that they would take time off to focus on childcare, and just over half thought childcare should be shared by both parents. Thirty-seven percent felt that a child would have a considerable effect on their careers. Differences were seen in responses when compared by gender. The application of sensitivity analysis to workforce calculations based around changing societal work-life expectations can have substantial effects on predicting workforce data a decade into the future. It is not just the demographic change to a more feminized workforce in Australia that can have substantial effect, but also the change in social expectations of males in regards to parenting.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentists/supply & distribution , Family , Parenting , Students, Dental/psychology , Age Factors , Australia , Career Mobility , Child , Child Care , Cohort Studies , Dentists/statistics & numerical data , Economic Competition , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Workload , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...