Staples versus sutures wound closure in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare two methods of wound skin closure-staples versus vertical mattress nylon sutures-in patients undergoing primary total hip (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR). The comparison was for wound complications as a primary outcome, and satisfaction of patient and nurse as secondary outcomes. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was conducted at an academic teaching hospital. All the patients who were admitted for either primary THR or TKR from September 2018 to September 2019 were included. Revision surgeries, patients >85 years of age, and those who were on steroid therapy were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups (staples and sutures) to compare the two methods of wound closure. Patients in each group were assessed for characteristics such as age, sex, weight, height, comorbidities, smoking status, postoperative wound complications, reoperation and patient/nurse satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the staples group (n=50), 26 patients underwent THR while 24 patients underwent TKR. In the sutures group (n=50), 23 patients underwent THR and 27 patients underwent TKR. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups (staples versus sutures) in terms of wound complications (p=0.401), patient satisfaction (p=0.357) and nurse satisfaction (p=0.513). Further analysis compared THR and TKR subgroups (THR staples versus THR sutures and TKR staples versus TKR sutures). The results showed no significant difference between the staples and sutures subgroups of THR and TKR in terms of wound complications, patient satisfaction and nurse satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In THR and TKR, there was no significant difference between either vertical mattress nylon sutures or staples primary skin closure in terms of wound complications and patient satisfaction in this study. The decision on wound closure method should be based on the availability of resources in the institution/country.

A novel method in assessing lower limb motor function.

PURPOSE: To propose a novel, accurate, and easy to perform test replacing the manual muscle testing. Our target is to develop a valuable tool for identification of patients with neurological motor impairment precisely, rapidly, and easily. METHODS: We have randomly selected patients presenting to the clinic complaining of back pain with or without lower limb symptoms. These patients were asked to walk on their heels and on their toes. Being unable to walk on heels and/or toes, the patient is considered to have positive test result (abnormal finding). After that, a full and thorough neurological examination was performed on every patient by an orthopedic resident doctor. We looked specifically to the correlation between the ability to do toe-heel walking with the results of the detailed neurological examination. RESULTS: Toe-heel walking test was able to detect all patients with weakness in their lower limb musculature. The results from the current investigation indicate a very high Pearson correlation of 0.95 ( p = 0.001) between the toe-heel test and manual muscle testing. CONCLUSION: Toe-heel walking test is superior to detailed neurological examination in identification of patients with weakness, sphincter problem, and/or positive straight leg raising test. This test is both simple and rapidly performed test, which can be easily done by any health-care provider. Owing to its ease, this test is not restricted to medical doctors, but it could be accurately performed by any health-care provider such as nurses and physiotherapists. This will enable us to decrease the referral to the specialty clinic and to decrease the overall cost.