The Connection Between Anatomical Substrate and Clinical Severity in Fetal Ebstein Anomaly.

Ebstein anomaly (EA) is a rare congenital heart defect characterized by abnormal development of the tricuspid valve (TV) and right ventricular myocardium. This study documents 2 dramatic cases of fetal EA characterized by hydrops and cardiomegaly, leading to intrauterine or early neonatal death. These clinical outcomes were associated with morphological abnormalities including severe tricuspid regurgitation, unguarded TV orifice, pulmonary atresia, and flattened right ventricular myocardium. This study highlights that these adverse anatomical features may result in unfavorable clinical outcomes in fetal EA. While timely identification of such features by prenatal ultrasound is crucial for providing accurate prognostic stratification and guiding treatment decisions, fetopsy may be necessary to discern EA among the spectrum of right-heart anomalies.

The next phase in patient safety education: Towards a standardized, tools-based pathology patient safety curriculum: A call to action from the Association of Pathology Chairs' Residency Program Directors Section Training Residents in Patient Safety Workgroup.

Patient safety education is a mandated Common Program Requirement of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and for the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada in all medical residency and fellowship programs. Although many hospitals and healthcare environments have general patient safety education tools for trainees, few to none focus on the unique training milieu of pathologists, including a mix of highly automated and manual error-prone processes, frequent multiplicity of events, and lack of direct patient relationships for error disclosure. We established a national Association of Pathology Chairs-Program Directors Section Workgroup focused on patient safety education for pathology trainees entitled Training Residents in Patient Safety (TRIPS). TRIPS included diverse representatives from across the United States, as well as representatives from pathology organizations including the American Board of Pathology, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine. Objectives of the workgroup included developing a standardized patient safety curriculum, designing teaching and assessment tools, and refining them with pilot sites. Here we report the establishment of TRIPS as well as data from national needs assessment of Program Directors across the country, who confirmed the need for a standardized patient safety curriculum.

Angiomyxoma of the Breast: A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 40 Cases.

Superficial angiomyxoma is an uncommon benign mesenchymal neoplasm that usually arises in dermis/subcutis of the extremities or trunk. Some tumors are associated with Carney complex. When arising in breast, these tumors are not well-recognized, mainly due to a lack of uniform nomenclature in the literature. This study therefore aims to improve recognition of angiomyxomas of the breast region. Forty cases were identified: demographics, presence of Carney complex, imaging and histologic features, PRKAR1A expression, and outcomes were evaluated. There were 22 female and 18 male patients (median age 40 years, range: 14 to 72). Most tumors presented as slowly-growing masses (77%). All but one were solitary, and median size was 1.5 cm. Tumors were superficial (dermal/subcutaneous) in 52.5% and deep/parenchymal in 47.5%. Nine involved the nipple-areola complex. All showed characteristic features of superficial angiomyxoma: poorly circumscribed, hypocellular, myxoid neoplasms with lobulated (55%) or infiltrative (45%) architecture, bland spindled fibroblasts, prominent thin-walled vessels, and admixed neutrophils. Tumors involving the nipple-areola complex infiltrated through areolar smooth muscle, and deep/parenchymal tumors showed entrapment of lobules mimicking myxoid fibroadenoma. Mitoses were typically absent, as was significant atypia. Cystic change was common. Two-thirds showed loss of PRKAR1A expression by immunohistochemistry. Two patients had Carney complex (7%). Recurrence after incomplete excision occurred in 1 patient. Angiomyxoma of breast may arise at superficial, nipple-areola or deep/parenchymal locations, where it can be difficult to recognize classic histologic features. Loss of expression of PRKAR1A is not invariable, but may be a helpful diagnostic clue. Recognizing angiomyxoma is important for 2 reasons: first, the recurrence rate is low and therefore wide excision is not essential, and second, it may allow detection of Carney complex in some patients.

Does the addition of AMACR to CK20 help to diagnose challenging cases of urothelial carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND: Urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) in the bladder can be difficult to diagnose due to factors including procedural artifact, minimal tissue sampled, therapy-related changes, and various CIS growth patterns. Prior data has demonstrated an increase in alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) in urothelial CIS, but there is no information on its utility for diagnosing difficult cases. The aim of this investigation was to assess the expression of AMACR that was ordered on equivocal bladder cases during clinical practice. METHODS: Transurethral resections of the bladder in which AMACR and CK20 were performed during diagnostic workup were identified and cases with a final diagnosis of CIS (n = 22) or non-neoplastic urothelium (n = 30) were selected. Additionally, cases in which a diagnosis of CIS was rendered without IHC (n = 20) were selected and tested for AMACR expression. RESULTS: Sensitivity of AMACR for CIS diagnosed with IHC during clinical practice was 73% and specificity was 97%, while CK20 was 95% sensitive and 80% specific. Sensitivity of AMACR in CIS diagnosed without IHC was 100%. In all groups, AMACR had inconsistent intensity, compared to CK20 which had consistent, strong intensity. CONCLUSIONS: AMACR was usually positive in urothelial CIS and negative in non-neoplastic urothelium. However, it is important to note that AMACR was less sensitive in difficult cases, while CK20 was more sensitive with more consistent, strong staining compared to AMACR.