Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the new EULAR/ACR criteria, particularly for early detection of cSLE, in comparison to the SLICC criteria among the pediatric population in multiple centers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that enrolled pediatric patients up to the age of 14 years who've been diagnosed with SLE and followed in pediatric rheumatology clinics at 9 multi-tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2021 as a case group and were compared to a similar group of pediatric patients who've had defined rheumatological diseases other than SLE with a positive ANA titer (≥1:80) as controls. In total, 245 patients were included and distributed as 129 cases (diagnosed by expert pediatric rheumatologists) versus 116 patients in the control group. All relevant clinical information, including history, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests, was documented at the initial presentations. Then, the two sets of SLE classification criteria were applied to both groups to define who's going to meet both or either one of them. The exclusion criteria included those who had insufficient data or had overlapping or undifferentiated diseases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating curve (ROC), and accuracy were calculated for SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria (total scores≥ 10 and ≥ 13). We performed a Chi-squared test to compare sensitivity and specificity of SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019. RESULTS: For SLICC (cut-off ≥4 criteria), the sensitivity was found to be 96.9% (95% CI 92.6%-99.4%) and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI 89.6%-98.32%), with PPV and NPV of 95.4% and 96.5%, respectively. The ROC for it was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), and this criterion had an accuracy of 95%. Regarding EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the performance measure showed a sensitivity of 99.2% and a specificity of 86.2%. Similarly, PPV was 88.9%; while NPV was a little higher (99.0%) than SLICC. The ROC for EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.96), and this criterion had an accuracy of 93%. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of either using SLICC or EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), as reflected by a p-value of 0.86 using the Chi-squared test. Although applying the EULAR/ACR with a total score of ≥ 13 revealed lower sensitivity (93.8%) than both the SLICC and the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the specificity for it was found to increase up to 91.4% (85.7-96.2%) compared to the (86.2%) specificity of the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10). CONCLUSION: In this cohort among the Saudi population with childhood-onset SLE, the new EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria efficiently enable early detection of SLE, although a more frequent rate of false positives was observed with them. Escalating the total score from ≥ 10 to ≥ 13 in the cSLE population improved the specificity close to that of SLICC 2012. Further prospective studies in pediatrics need to be done for the validation of a cut- off score of ≥ 13 in cSLE rather than the traditional score of ≥ 10 in aSLE.

Bone mineral density in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, and systemic vasculitis: relationship to disease duration, cumulative corticosteroid dose, calcium intake, and exercise.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of abnormal bone mineralization in a population of children with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), and systemic vasculitis; and to investigate the relationship of bone mineral density (BMD) to cumulative corticosteroid dose, disease duration, Tanner stage, calcium intake, and exercise in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children attending the pediatric rheumatology clinic at British Columbia's Children's Hospital was conducted to obtain demographic data (sex, ethnicity, disease duration, cumulative corticosteroid dose, and mean daily corticosteroid dose). All patients had at least one BMD measurement by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at lumbar spine, hip, and total body. BMD was expressed as g/cm2 and Z scores; an abnormal Z score was defined as

The role of subcutaneous administration of methotrexate in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who have failed oral methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with subcutaneous (Sc) methotrexate (MTX) after failing oral MTX (either because of inefficacy or toxicity) in a clinic population. METHODS: The study cohort was identified from our clinical database, and consisted of 61 children with JIA treated with MTX between 1988-2001. All patients fulfilled International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) criteria for JIA and had disease duration of >/= 6 months and 3 or more active joints before institution of MTX. All patients had a core set of outcome variables assessed at baseline and at 3 months after achieving both maximum oral and SC MTX. Outcome variables included physician global assessment of disease activity, number of active joints, number of joints with limited range of motion, duration of early morning stiffness, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Improvement was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 variables in the core set, with no more than one of the remaining variables worsening by more than 30%. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients, 43 females and 18 males with JIA were studied. The disease subtypes were systemic 8, polyarticular 25 (12 rheumatoid factor positive), oligoarticular 14, enthesitis related arthritis 5, and unclassified 4. Thirty-one patients were switched to SC MTX, 13 of whom had not improved, and 18 who had improved, but had nausea (11) or insufficient clinical improvement (7). After 3 months of SC MTX treatment, 76% of patients were classified as improved and 23% as not improved. Toxicity on SC MTX was less than on oral MTX. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that for patients failing oral MTX either because of inefficacy or toxicity, the use of SC MTX has a high likelihood of success with more than 70% of patients achieving clinically significant improvement, without clinically significant toxicity.