Pharmacist-led education curriculum for fourth-year medical students: a single-center experience

Background: Doctors are usually challenged by the transition between theoretical basic science knowledge and actual clinical practice. Thus, a critical educational intervention is the early incorporation of pharmacists into the pharmacotherapy courses for undergraduate medical students from their college years and moving to the practice setting. Objective: We sought to determine if a pharmacist-led education course would improve medical students’ knowledge of general pharmacotherapy topics. Methods: All fourth-year female medical students were invited to enroll in the pharmacy practice curriculum between January and March 2022. The program was divided into three main domains: formal lectures, a hands-on prescription writing skills session, and on-site pharmacy practice sessions. The pharmacy practice session was divided into three sections: first section pharmacy practice, second section pharmacy innovation, and the third section clinical pharmacy. Those who completed the curriculum were requested to complete preand post-session assessments and curriculum evaluations. Results: One hundred fourteen medical students enrolled in the pharmacy practice module. One hundred eleven (97.4%) completed the pre-and post-course assessment. After completing the module, the medical students’ knowledge scores improved from pre- to post-course. A significant difference in the overall knowledge was observed between the pre-course and post-course scores (9.51 versus 16.04; p<0.001). The difference between the pre-course and post-course scores was also significant when comparing the knowledge per each part of the assessment, showing an average score of 2.78 versus 4.05 (p<0.001) for the first section; 3.39 versus 5.49 (p<0.001) for the second section; 3.34 versus 6.48 (p<0.001) for the third section. The program received overall positive feedback; the experience was rated overall as “Excellent” by 73% of the participants. (AU)

Patterns of infections and antimicrobial drugs' prescribing among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial agents are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in pregnancy due to the increased susceptibility to infections during pregnancy. Antimicrobials can contribute to different maternal complications. Therefore, it is important to study their patterns in prescription and utilization. The data regarding this issue is scarce in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to generate data on the antimicrobial agents that are most commonly prescribed during pregnancy as well as their indications and safety. METHODS: This is a retrospective study focusing on pregnant women with a known antimicrobial use at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH). The sample included 344 pregnant women with a total of 688 antimicrobial agents prescribed. Data was collected on the proportion of pregnant women who received antimicrobial agents and on the drug safety during pregnancy using the risk categorization system of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). RESULTS: The results showed that urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most reported (59%) infectious diseases. Around 48% of pregnant women received antimicrobial medications at some point during pregnancy. The top two antimicrobial agents based on prescription frequency were B-lactams (44.6%) and azole anti-fungals (30%). The prescribed drugs in the study were found to be from classes B, C and D under the FDA risk classification system. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a high proportion of antimicrobials prescribed during pregnancy that might pose risks to mothers and their fetuses. Future multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate the rational prescription of antimicrobial medications during pregnancy.

Evaluation of acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia among critically ill patients in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Microbiology; Bacteria; Antimicrobial; Infectious disease; Medical microbiology; Pharmacology; Pneumonia; Acinetobacter baumannii; Colistin.

Pharmacovigilance Perception and Knowledge Among Pharmacists and Interns in Saudi Arabia.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the level of knowledge and perception of ADRs reporting and pharmacovigilance among interns and hospital pharmacists in different health-care settings in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among pharmacists and pharmacy interns in different hospitals in Saudi Arabia. A total of 315 participants completed the self-administered and validated questionnaire during the period from August 2018 to March 2019. RESULTS: There was poor perception and knowledge of pharmacovigilance and ADRs reporting among pharmacists as well as intern pharmacists. However, pharmacists had better knowledge score compared to interns (P=0.043). Most of the respondents believed that ADRs reporting is important. The majority of both interns and pharmacists stated that they did not receive adequate education about pharmacovigilance during their undergraduate or internship program. CONCLUSION: There is a gap in knowledge and perception about pharmacovigilance among practicing pharmacists and new pharmacy graduates. Drug safety fundamentals and policies should be taught to undergraduate pharmacy students in Saudi Arabia.

Study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial of ketamine for acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hematological disorder where the shape of red blood cells is altered, resulting in the destruction of red blood cells, anemia, and other complications. SCD is prevalent in the southern and eastern provinces of the Arabian peninsula. The most common complications for individuals with SCD are acute painful episodes that require several doses of intravenous opioids, making pain control for these individuals challenging. Instead of opioids, some studies have suggested that ketamine might be used for pain control in acute pain episodes of individuals with SCD. This study aims to evaluate whether the addition of ketamine to morphine can achieve better pain control, decreasing the number of repeated doses of opiates. We hypothesize that early administration of ketamine would lead to a more rapid improvement in pain score and lower opioid requirements. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a prospective, randomized, concealed, blinded, pragmatic parallel group, controlled trial enrolling adult patients with SCD and acute vaso-occlusive crisis pain. All patients will receive standard analgesic therapy during evaluation. Patients randomized to the treatment arm will receive low-dose ketamine (0.3 mg/kg in 0.9% sodium chloride, 100 ml bag) in addition to standard intravenous hydration, while those in the control group will receive a standard dose of morphine (0.1 mg/kg in 0.9% sodium chloride, 100 ml bag) in addition to the standard intravenous hydration. All healthcare providers will be blinded to the treatment arm. Data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome is improvement in pain severity using the Numerical Pain Rating Score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03431285 . Registered on 13 February 2018.

Comparison of Time to Therapeutic aPTT in Patients Who Received Continuous Unfractionated Heparin After Implementation of Pharmacy-wide Intervention Alerts.

Background: For patients on continuous IV unfractionated heparin (UFH), failing to achieve a therapeutic aPTT by 24 hours can be associated with increased morbidity. A pharmacy clinical surveillance system (PCSS) subtherapeutic aPTT alert was implemented at our institution to improve achievement of therapeutic aPTT goals by 24 hours. Objective: The primary objective was the time to achieve the minimum goal aPTT before and after the alert implementation. The secondary objectives were to examine the percentage of patients who achieved the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours and the number of dose changes to achieve the minimum goal aPTT. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to include all adult inpatients receiving a continuous UFH infusion during a 3-month period prior to the implementation of a subtherapeutic aPTT alert and a 3-month period after implementation. Results: 317 patients were included in the analysis. The average time to achieve the minimum goal aPTT was 21.8 hours prior to alert implementation and 15.4 hours after implementation (p = .002). The percent of patients who achieved the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours was 65.7% prior to alert implementation and 82.4% after implementation (p = .035). The average number of dose changes necessary to achieve aPTT value to the minimum goal aPTT prior to alert implementation was 1.67 and 1. 98 after implementation (p = .68). Conclusion: This analysis showed that implementation of a PCSS subtherapeutic aPTT alert for patients on continuous UFH infusions may ensure patients reach goal aPTT faster and facilitate a higher percent of patients who achieve the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours.