ABSTRACT
Gastric schwannomas (GS) are rare mesenchymal tumors from Schwann cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, representing 2-6% of such tumors. We report a 52-year-old woman who experienced abdominal pain, hematemesis, and melena, initially suspected of having a GI stromal tumor through ultrasound and computed tomography abdomen. Despite no active bleeding found during an upper endoscopy, she underwent a successful open subtotal gastrectomy, with histopathology confirming GS. The diagnosis of GS, which may mimic other GI conditions, relies heavily on imaging and histopathological analysis due to its nonspecific symptomatology, including the potential for both upper and lower GI bleeding. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges of GS and highlights surgical resection as the preferred treatment, generally leading to a favorable prognosis.
ABSTRACT
In 2018, the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Saudi Arabia developed a clinical excellence strategy. An objective was to reduce variation in clinical practices in MoH hospitals, particularly for conditions with high mortality in Saudi Arabia, by applying best practice clinical standards and using the clinical audit process to measure clinical practice. The strategy included working with multiprofessional teams in hospitals to implement improvements needed in clinical practice. To test the feasibility of carrying out national clinical audits in MoH hospitals, audits were carried out in 16 MoH hospitals on four clinical subjects-acute myocardial infarction, major trauma, sepsis, and stroke. Clinical expert groups, including Saudi clinicians and an international clinical expert, developed clinical care standards for the four conditions from analyses of international and Saudi clinical guidelines. The audits were designed with the expert groups. Multiprofessional teams were appointed to carry out the audits in designated MoH hospitals. Data collectors in each hospital were trained to collect data. Workshops were held with the teams on the clinical care standards and how data would be collected for the audits, and later, on the findings of data collection and how to use the improvement process to implement changes to improve compliance with the standards. After 4 months, data collection was repeated to determine if compliance with the clinical care standards had improved. Data collected from each hospital for both cycles of data collection were independently reliably tested. All designated hospitals participated in the audits, collecting and submitting data for two rounds of data collection and implementing improvement plans after the first round of data collection. All hospitals made substantial improvements in clinical practices. Of a total of 84 measures used to assess compliance with a total of 52 clinical care standards for the four clinical conditions, improvements were made by hospital teams in 58 (69.1%) measures. Improvements were statistically significant for 34 (40.5%) measures. The project demonstrated that well-designed and executed audits using evidence-based clinical care standards can result in substantial improvements in clinical practices in MoH hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Keys to success were the improvement methodology built into the audit process and the requirement for hospitals to appoint multiprofessional teams to carry out the audits. The approach adds to evidence on the effectiveness of clinical audits in achieving improvements in clinical quality and can be replicated in national audit programmes.
Subject(s)
Hospitals , Quality Improvement , Humans , Saudi Arabia , Clinical Audit , Standard of CareABSTRACT
Vaccines have been vital in preventing and curbing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adenoviral vector-based vaccines, namely the ChAdOx1-S vaccine (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA), have been associated with a possibly fatal adverse event known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), wherein thrombi form in unusual sites, mainly the cerebral and splanchnic veins. With the female gender predominantly affected, patients present with headache, abdominal pain, neurological symptoms and fever. It is hypothesized that certain components of the vaccine, including the adenovirus vector, may trigger the formation of antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4). The antigen-antibody complexes that form thereafter then activate a cascade of reactions eventually leading to the consumptive coagulopathy. This pathogenesis closely resembles a well-understood complication of heparin, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The lab results in VITT are reflective of its proposed pathophysiology: low platelets, low fibrinogen and high D-dimer, in addition to elevated anti-PF4 titers are classic findings. Treatment mainly includes non-heparin anticoagulants, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange. There is some role for surgical intervention, such as mechanical thrombectomy. Mortality due to VITT is usually caused by cerebral hemorrhage. We describe a case of a 36-year-old female who presented with epigastric pain two weeks after receiving her first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine, and upon workup, was subsequently found to have thrombosis of her right portal and right common iliac vein.
ABSTRACT
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical presentations seen in the emergency department, usually presenting as a case of fever, anorexia, and abdominal pain. Curative treatment is an appendectomy with histological examination of the surgical specimen to diagnose the subtypes or causes of appendicitis. One of these subtypes, granulomatous appendicitis, is an uncommon form of appendicitis. This condition can be caused by a multitude of mechanisms, including tuberculosis infections, parasitic infections, fungal infections, mechanical obstruction, or systemic diseases such as Crohn's disease, sarcoidosis, among others. Investigations and management should be tailored according to the histologic findings, and patient follow-up should be advised.
