ABSTRACT
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is a geographically widespread RNA virus with a high degree of genomic diversity that complicates sequence-based diagnostics. Here, we sequenced eight CCHFV strains for improved assay design and deposition into FDA-ARGOS, the FDA's pathogen database for development and verification of next generation sequencing assays.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Stent implantation for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) with preserved left ventricular function has been found to have a better clinical and angiographic outcome at one year than balloon angioplasty (PTCA). OBJECTIVE: To establish whether those results are maintained at five year follow up. METHODS: Patients were followed at least every six months. For those who died during follow up, data were obtained from medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Freedom from death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeated target lesion revascularisation. Secondary end points were revascularisation in a remote region and freedom from angina. RESULTS: Follow up was complete in all patients. At five years, the primary end point was reached more often by patients randomised to stent implantation than to PTCA (80% v 53%; odds ratio (OR) 0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.69); p = 0.0034). In the PTCA group, 35% of patients underwent target lesion revascularisation v 15% in the stent group (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.80; p = 0.014). There was a trend towards increased mortality in the PTCA group than in the stent group (17% v 7%; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21; p = 0.098). No significant differences were found between PTCA and stent groups for non-fatal myocardial infarction (8% v 5%; OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.54; p = 0.46) or cerebrovascular accident (2% v 0%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated stenosis of the proximal LAD, a five year clinical follow up confirmed a better outcome in those treated with stenting than with PTCA.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Acute Disease , Angina Pectoris/complications , Angina Pectoris/therapy , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Coronary Stenosis/mortality , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, large-scale clinical trials have consistently shown that therapy with statins is of great benefit to patients with and at risk of developing coronary artery disease. We assessed, in a sample of patients with coronary artery disease in whom coronary angiography was indicated and hospitalized in the last 10 years, the use of statins at admission. METHODS: One hundred patients with stable coronary artery disease were randomly selected per year from 1991 to 2000. The final study population consisted of 1000 patients. The prescription of statins for > or = 6 months before hospital admission was determined from a hospital-wide clinical database. RESULTS: From 1995, the prevalence of patients treated with statins at hospital admission progressively increased. In 1991, only 2% of patients were treated with statins before hospital admission while in the year 2000, 38% of patients were receiving this treatment. The mean prevalence of patients treated with statins before and after 1995 was 3 vs 22% (p < 0.0001) respectively. The distribution of the demographic and clinical parameters and the prevalence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors were similar in patients treated or not treated with statins. CONCLUSIONS: After 1994, in coincidence with the publication of the results of clinical trials showing the benefit of statins in patients with coronary artery disease, the use of these drugs increased significantly. This finding suggests that the widespread diffusion of the results of the major clinical trials and of guidelines drawn up by medical associations have had a significant impact on statin prescription in patients with coronary artery disease. Nevertheless our data also indicate that, despite overwhelming evidence on the benefits of statin therapy, in current clinical practice cardiologists are not optimally utilizing lipid management and that statins are frequently prescribed without an appropriate analysis of risk factors.
