Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 111(5): 302-6, 308, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24765687

ABSTRACT

Low contraceptive utilisation and high fertility in rural Uttar Pradesh (UP), India, is a major concern for the world's second most populous country. The association between reasons for low contraceptive utilisation and maternal factors has been inadequately researched. Data from the 'morbidity and performance assessment' study were analysed to explore reasons for low contraceptive utilisation and their association with maternal factors among 308 women in Maitha, rural UP, India. Chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Majority (84.2%) of the rural women in Maitha, UP, India were not using any contraceptives. Upper caste, literate wives, and wives whose husbands were literate were more likely to use contraceptives. About one-third of the women did not want to use a contraceptive because they wanted another child. Large numbers (65.3%) of women wanted to use contraceptives but were unable to do so due to lack of knowledge (38.9%), fear of side-effects (15.5%), husband/family disapproval (15.5%), inconvenience (10.7%), and other reasons (19.1%). Maternal parity, wives' and husband's literacy were significantly associated with the reasons for low contraceptive utilisation (p < 0.05). Contraceptive utilisation can be Improved by taking into consideration such maternal characteristics. All state subsidised contraceptives should be more widely known, understood and made available.


Subject(s)
Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health , Adult , Age Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , India , Parity , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
2.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 20(7): 1232-9, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21495237

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of health care coverage (HCC) in follow-up of cervical cancer screening (seeking Papanicolaou test results and follow-up when abnormal results were found) among Colombian women. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study of 24,717 women, using the 2005 Colombian Demographic and Health Survey, was conducted. RESULTS: Nearly 4% of women screened did not seek their results. For approximately 17% of the women, there was no follow-up when abnormal results were found. Women in the contributory regime (private insurance) and those in the subsidized regime (public insurance) were more likely to seek Papanicolaou test results than women without HCC, even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors (adjusted odds ratio [ORa], 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.41 and ORa, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.58, respectively). For follow-up when abnormal results were found, there was no difference between the subsidized regime and no HCC, but women in the contributory regime were more likely to follow-up than women without HCC (ORa, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Seeking Papanicolaou test results is relatively high among Colombian women; however, there are differences according to HCC. Follow-up when abnormal Papanicolaou test results were found was positively associated only with private insurance; follow-up is the same for women without insurance and with public insurance. Exploring strategies to promote follow-up among women and to improve cervical cancer follow-up services for those enrolled in the subsidized regime may increase follow-up rates among Colombian women.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Colombia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control
3.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 53(5): e41-7, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18761290

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to examine the association between caste and maternal health care service use among rural Hindu women in India. We analyzed data from the Morbidity and Performance Assessment, a population-based cross-sectional study, for 482 Hindu women who were pregnant during January 1998 to January 1999 in Maitha, Uttar Pradesh, India. Maternal health care service use among both upper and lower caste women was very low. Upper caste women were almost three times more likely to use antenatal care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-5.30), tetanus toxoid (OR = 2.50; 95% CI, 1.48-4.21), and contraceptives (OR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.28-5.54) and almost five times (OR = 4.77; 95% CI, 1.81-12.54) more likely to have a trained birth attendant compared to the lower caste women. Caste was a significant determinant of tetanus toxoid use and trained birth attendant even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Besides caste, maternal literacy was the one sociodemographic factor that was significantly associated with the use of all maternal health care services. Information dissemination and awareness generation can improve the use of subsidized maternal health care services among women of all caste groups.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Welfare/ethnology , Social Class , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hinduism , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Humans , India , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Contraception ; 77(4): 270-5, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18342650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the rising influx of Hispanics to the United States, there is an ongoing need to promote health and wellness care to this non-English-speaking, minority population group. Programs, specifically developed to address the unique cultural mores of Hispanics, need to focus on increasing knowledge about health issues, particularly in the area of reproductive health. A study was conducted in Memphis, TN, to examine the differences between low-income Hispanic immigrants' and low-income non-Hispanics' (1) contraceptive use; (2) reproduction and contraception knowledge; as well as (3) the demographic and knowledge factors associated with their choice of contraceptive, in order to better formulate successful educational programs for area Hispanics. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of 226 women, recruited through a federal assistance program in Tennessee, was performed over a 5-month period in 2000 to 2001. Women, between the ages of 18 and 42, were individually interviewed to learn more about their reproduction knowledge and method of contraception. RESULTS: This study found that knowledge about reproduction and contraceptive use was significantly lower among Hispanics than non-Hispanics. Furthermore, contraceptive use was significantly lower among Hispanics than among non-Hispanics. Hispanics were less likely to use the oral contraceptive or have a tubal ligation, preferring injectable contraceptive. Non-Hispanics, who were more likely to use contraceptive methods, were less likely to use injectables, preferring the oral contraceptive. Among Hispanics, knowledge about contraceptives, number of children and marital status were associated with contraceptive use. Among non-Hispanics, only education was associated with contraceptive use. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeting Hispanic immigrants should be developed to increase their knowledge about contraceptive methods.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Emigrants and Immigrants , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hispanic or Latino , Adolescent , Adult , Contraception/methods , Contraception/psychology , Contraception Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Poverty , Tennessee
5.
Pediatrics ; 119 Suppl 1: S107-13, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17272577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to examine relationships among access to a medical home, special-health-care-needs status, and child and family characteristics in one Southern state. We hypothesized that access to a medical home is influenced by several family and child sociodemographic characteristics, including special-health-care status. METHODS: We used data from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health. The study sample comprised all Alabama resident children. The main dependent variable was a medical home; the primary independent variable classified children according to children-with-special-health-care-needs status. We controlled for child age, gender, race, family structure, health status, insurance coverage, household education, and poverty. We first explored means or proportions for the study variables and then estimated multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Children with special health care needs were significantly more likely than children without special health care needs to have a personal doctor or nurse, to have a preventive health care visit in the previous 12 months, and to have good communication with their provider. Children with special health care needs were also more likely to experience problems accessing specialty care, equipment, or services. Being uninsured, living at or near the federal poverty level, in a household where no one completed high school, being black, having less than excellent or good health, and living in a nontraditional family structure were characteristics associated with being less likely to have a medical home. In general, children-with-special-health-care-needs status was not related to having a medical home, but dependency on prescription medicine was. CONCLUSIONS: Assuring that all children, irrespective of family income, have access to and are enrolled in health insurance plans will move us closer to the national goal of having a medical home for all children, especially those with a special health care need, by 2010.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Alabama , Child , Child, Preschool , Disabled Children/statistics & numerical data , Family , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors
6.
Pediatrics ; 119 Suppl 1: S77-83, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17272589

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to examine the lifetime prevalence of learning disability by sociodemographic and family-functioning characteristics in US children, with particular attention paid to the children with special health care needs. METHODS: By using data from the National Survey of Children's Health, we calculated lifetime prevalence of learning disability using a question that asked whether a doctor or other health care or school professional ever told the survey respondent that the child had a learning disability. Children with and those without special health care needs were classified on the basis of how many of 5 definitional criteria for children with special health care needs they met (0-5). Bivariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to assess independent associations of selected sociodemographic and family variables with learning disability. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of learning disability in US children is 9.7%. Although prevalence of learning disability is lower among average developing children (5.4%), it still affected 2.7 million children compared with 3.3 million (27.8%) children with special health care needs. As the number of definitional criteria children with special health care needs met increased from 1 to 5, so did the prevalence of learning disability (15.0%, 27.1%, 41.6%, 69.3%, and 87.8%, respectively). In the adjusted logistic regression model, in addition to the number of definitional criteria the children met, variables associated with the increased odd ratios of learning disability were lower education, all categories of poverty <300% of the federal poverty level, being male, increasing age, having a 2-parent stepfamily or other family structure, being adopted, presence of a smoker, respondent's higher responses on aggravation in parenting scale, sharing ideas with the child less than very well, and never, rarely, or sometimes discussing serious disagreements calmly. CONCLUSIONS: Although more than half of lifetime prevalence of learning disability occurred in children with special health care needs, it is a significant morbidity in average-developing children as well. Learning disabilities represent important comorbidities among children with special health care needs.


Subject(s)
Learning Disabilities/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Disabled Children/statistics & numerical data , Family Relations , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
7.
Matern Child Health J ; 9(2 Suppl): S87-97, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15973483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to assess how the severity of a child's condition affects family functioning and the relationship with health care providers among children with special health care needs in Alabama. METHODS: Using the data from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN), three variables were used as measures of condition severity: responses to the CSHCN screener questions, whether condition affected the ability to do things for children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN), and the level of severity of CYSHCN's condition. The dependent variables included family functioning and provider relationship. RESULTS: CYSHCN who only take prescription medicine for their chronic condition (MO) had lower condition severity from those who have other needs (NMO). In NMO CYSHCN, higher condition severity was associated with increased strain on family functioning outcomes and higher unmet needs in provider relationship outcomes, adjusted for demographic and insurance variables. Families of NMO CYSHCN with a more severe condition spent more temporal and financial resources and had a higher need for professional care coordination, and were less likely to have sensitive providers. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of condition is an important factor increasing strain on family resources and relationship with the provider. Our results indicate the need for professional care coordination and family support, particularly among those families in which there is a NMO CYSHCN with a more severe condition. This finding supports the mandate that all CYSHCN should have their health care coordinated and provided in the context of a medical home.


Subject(s)
Disabled Children/classification , Health Services Needs and Demand , Professional-Family Relations , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Alabama , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Odds Ratio
8.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972) ; 57(4): 208-14, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12405239

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to determine whether there is an independent association between physical abuse during pregnancy or stress because of emotional, sexual, or physical abuse during pregnancy and birthweight after adjusting for behavioral, psychosocial, demographic, and medical variables. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study of 808 low-income women, age 18 years or older, who delivered single infants from pregnancies of 20 weeks or longer. Abuse during the current pregnancy was measured as reported events of physical abuse and stress because of emotional, sexual, or physical abuse. Multiple regression models were developed to estimate the association of low birthweight (LBW) and mean birthweight with abuse during pregnancy, adjusting for behavioral, psychosocial, demographic, and medical variables. RESULTS: Physical abuse during pregnancy was not associated with LBW or with mean birthweight. Women who reported stress because of abuse had 2.1 times higher odds of LBW (95% CI 1.2, 3.6) than those who did not, and the mean birthweight of their infants was 236 g lower (95% CI -371, -102) than those of women who reported no stress because of abuse in the adjusted regression models. Furthermore, the adjusted mean birthweight for LBW infants of women reporting stress because of abuse was significantly lower (-372, 95% CI 595, -149) than for LBW infants of women reporting no stress. CONCLUSIONS: Stress because of abuse during pregnancy was associated with both LBW and lower mean birthweight after adjusting for behavioral, psychosocial, demographic, and medical variables.


Subject(s)
Birth Weight , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Pregnancy Complications , Spouse Abuse , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Life Style , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , Spouse Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...