Increased dendritic cell density and altered morphology in allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Corneal and conjunctival epithelial dendritic cells (DC) have an established role in vernal keratoconjunctivitis, however, their role in more prevalent forms of allergic eye disease remains unclear. This study evaluated corneal and conjunctival epithelial DC density, morphology, and distribution observed using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, 66 participants (mean age 36.6 ± 12.0 years, 56% female): 33 with allergic conjunctivitis and 33 controls were recruited. IVCM was performed at the corneal centre, inferior whorl, corneal periphery, corneal limbus, and temporal bulbar conjunctiva. DC were counted and their morphology was assessed as follows: largest cell body size, presence of dendrites, and presence of long and thick dendrites. Mixed model analysis (DC density) and non-parametric tests (DC morphology) were used. RESULTS: DC density was higher in allergic participants at all locations (p ≤ 0.01), (corneal centre median (IQR) 21.9 (8.7-50.9) cells/mm2 vs 13.1 (2.8-22.8) cells/mm2; periphery 37.5 (15.6-67.2) cells/mm2 vs 20 (9.4-32.5) cells/mm2; limbus 75 (60-120) cells/mm2 vs 58.1 (44.4-66.2) cells/mm2; conjunctiva 10 (0-54.4) cells/mm2 vs 0.6 (0-5.6) cells/mm2, but not at the inferior whorl 21.9 (6.2-34.4) cells/mm2 vs 12.5 (1.9-37.5) cells/mm2, p = 0.20. At the corneal centre, allergic participants had larger DC bodies (p = 0.02), a higher proportion of DC with dendrites (p = 0.02) and long dendrites (p = 0.003) compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal and conjunctival DC density was increased, and morphology altered in allergic conjunctivitis. These findings imply that the ocular surface immune response was upregulated and support an increased antigen-capture capacity of DC in allergic conjunctivitis.

Dendritiform immune cells with reduced antigen-capture capacity persist in the cornea during the asymptomatic phase of allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Increased density and altered morphology of dendritic cells (DC) in the cornea and conjunctiva occur during active allergic conjunctivitis. This study investigated whether inflammation (characterised by altered DC density and morphology) persists during the symptom-free phase of allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: Twenty participants (age 43.3 ± 14.3 years, 55% female) assessed during their active (symptomatic) phase of allergic conjunctivitis were re-examined during the asymptomatic phase. Ocular allergy symptoms and signs were evaluated during both phases, and five ocular surface locations (corneal centre, inferior whorl, corneal periphery, corneal limbus, and bulbar conjunctiva) were examined using in vivo confocal microscopy (HRT III). DC were counted manually, and their morphology was assessed for cell body size, presence of dendrites, presence of long dendrites and presence of thick dendrites using a grading system. Mixed model analysis (DC density) and non-parametric tests (DC morphology) were used to examine differences between phases. RESULTS: DC density at corneal locations did not change between the active and asymptomatic phases (p ≥ 0.22). However, corneal DC body size was smaller and fewer DC presented with long dendrites during the asymptomatic phase (p ≤ 0.02). In contrast, at the bulbar conjunctiva, DC density was reduced during the asymptomatic phase compared to the active phase (p = 0.01), but there were no changes in DC morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Dendritiform immune cell numbers persist in the cornea during the symptom-free phase of allergic conjunctivitis, whereas conjunctival DC appear to return to a baseline state. The morphology of these persisting corneal DC suggests their antigen-capture capacity is reduced during the asymptomatic phase.

Added Diagnostic Value of Peanut Component Testing: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Children.

BACKGROUND: Peanut components are widely used in clinical practice; however, their utility to predict challenge outcome in the Australian children, outside of infants, is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: Can peanut component testing predict outcome of challenge in peanut-allergic children. METHODS: All children attending peanut challenges, regardless of previous allergic reactions to peanut or sensitization (skin prick test or peanut IgE) alone, were recruited. Serum collected before the challenge was analyzed for peanut IgE and Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 (ImmunoCap). RESULTS: Of the 222 children recruited, 89 (40%) were allergic on oral food challenge. Ara h 2 and 6 performed similarly to peanut IgE and skin prick test in predicting challenge outcome (area under the curve, 0.84-0.87). No baseline clinical characteristics, including past history, predicted challenge outcome. By logistic regression, degree of polysensitization to Ara h 1, 2, or 3 increased the odds of allergic reaction at oral food challenge at 0.35 and 1.0 kUA/L cutoff levels (P < .001 for both). All 11 children sensitized (>0.35 kUA/L) to Ara h 1, 2, and 3 reacted to peanut challenge. Degree of polysensitization at more than 1.0 kUA/L was associated with a lower cumulative eliciting dose (P = .016) and with severity of allergic reaction on challenge (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, sensitization to the combination of Ara h 1, 2, and 3 was highly predictive of peanut allergy. Overall, only Ara h 2 as individual component most correlated with severity of reaction at challenge and adrenaline use. Ara h 8 and 9 were not useful in predicting challenge outcome.

Skin testing with ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow's milk in children with cow's milk allergy.

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of cow's milk (CM)-allergic children are able to tolerate extensively heated forms of CM such as baked goods. Little is known about whether ultra-heat-treated (UHT) forms of cow's milk are immunologically similar to extensively heated cow's milk and therefore may be tolerated by these children. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether skin test wheal size using UHT CM was significantly different from other forms of CM and CM extracts. METHODS: Children presenting for oral food challenges with either extensively heated or unheated cow's milk underwent skin prick test (SPT) to commercial CM, UHT CM, evaporated CM, and fresh whole CM. The results were compared between groups of children. RESULTS: At study exit, only 14% of children were avoiding all forms of CM, compared with 70% at study entry. No difference was seen in the mean SPT results for UHT CM between those children that could tolerate heated CM compared with those that could not. The mean SPT result for casein was significantly lower in those that could tolerate heated CM. However, within the group of heated milk-tolerant children, the mean SPT for UHT CM was significantly lower than the SPT for fresh whole CM. CONCLUSION: Ultra-heat-treated CM does not behave significantly differently from other forms of CM when evaluated by SPT in heated milk-allergic vs heated milk-tolerant children. This suggests that UHT CM is not sufficiently immunologically different from unheated CM to be tolerated by heated CM-tolerant children.