ABSTRACT
Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder in women, often associated with metabolic issues like obesity and insulin resistance. Lifestyle changes, including weight loss, healthy eating, and regular exercise, are recommended for PCOS management. Studies have explored women's perspectives on these changes, revealing misconceptions and adherence challenges. Recognizing the importance of individualized interventions, particularly addressing knowledge gaps, is vital for improving the quality of life for women with PCOS, especially in cultural contexts like Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia from May to August 2023 including PCOS patients. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using IBM SPSS 29 (IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines and principles outlined by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Taif University (no.44-359). All participants provided informed consent, and the study protocols, including data collection, analysis, and publication, adhered to the relevant ethical standards. Results Our study included a majority aged 18-29 (27.4%), married individuals (55.6%) and those with a Bachelor's degree (72%). About 46.9% were medically diagnosed with PCOS. A notable proportion (70.2%) reported no family history of PCOS. Doctors were the primary information source (40.7%). Knowledge about PCOS was generally high, with correct recognition of various PCOS characteristics and treatment options. Attitudes were positive, especially among medically diagnosed individuals, and 91% believed weight reduction could improve PCOS symptoms. Lifestyle modification knowledge, attitude, and practices showed significant associations with demographic factors like age, place of residence, education, marital status, working in healthcare sectors, and PCOS diagnosis status. Conclusions Knowledge about PCOS is generally high among women with positive attitudes toward its management through lifestyle modifications. Women generally show positive practices of lifestyle modifications in PCOS, and they are associated with sociodemographic features.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Saudi Arabia has one of the highest obesity rates (35.4%) in the world, and bariatric surgery (BS) has emerged as the most effective treatment for obesity and its comorbidities. Despite its effectiveness, it is a known risk factor for cholelithiasis. The aim of this study is to identify the incidence and risk factors that contribute to the development of symptomatic cholelithiasis after different types of bariatric surgery in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among the Saudi adult population. The sample size was 706 participants who underwent bariatric surgery from all over Saudi Arabia. Data collection was done through a validated online self-reported survey. RESULTS: Out of 706 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, it was found that the incidence of gallstones (GS) after bariatric surgery was 18.8%. The most incidence was during the first year of surgery, where the number of individuals reached 80.4%. The majority were in females (22.9%) and those who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery (51.2%). Patients who had a body mass index (BMI) of >25 kg/m² significantly had a higher incidence of gallstones (23.1%) compared to those who had a lesser BMI (15.8%). As the analysis showed, the medication used to prevent the occurrence of gallstones can be considered one of the protective factors, where 85.4% of individuals who used these medications did not develop cholelithiasis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of gallstones after bariatric surgery was high, particularly within the first year of surgery. The increase in postoperative gallstone formation is correlated with hyperlipidemia and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as basic predictive factors. On the contrary, the medication used to prevent the occurrence of gallstones is considered a protective factor.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nowadays patients are encouraged to partake in healthcare decision making and patient preferences are given increasing weight. Patient's choice is important to reduce waiting time and to encourage competition between providers, as most patients look for high-quality care while minimizing costs, according to different studies this may not be as simple as the attributes and factors that patients value when selecting a hospital or surgeon. Overall, Saudi Arabia has minimal research on how patients select surgeons or surgical facilities. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to evaluate the criteria Saudi population patients used to select their surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to determine the relative importance of the following aspects that patients may consider when selecting a surgeon: (a) physician-related considerations; (b) elements relating to healthcare service and access; (c) the perspectives of patients on various factors. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study attempts to investigate the criteria that people in Saudi Arabia considered most important while selecting their surgeons. This study was conducted between August and November 2022. The questionnaire is also given in English along with Arabic. RESULTS: Six hundred nine completed the survey with a response rate of 91.6%. Concerning physician-related factors considered when choosing a surgeon attitudes of the physician were the factor most significantly contributed to physician selection rather than reputation or professional experience and physician social media: (84.7%) mentioned that paying attention to patient's needs and opinions is important; sparing enough time for patients is important as reported by 83.9% of the participants; Personal care and hygiene is important for 83.4% of the participants; Communication skills were considered to be important as stated by 82.6% of the participants. Regarding healthcare services/access-related factors considered by patients in physician selection; it was found that patients considered hospital hygiene-cleanliness (91.3 %) as the most significant healthcare service/access-related factor in physician selection and then it comes Ease of obtaining an appointment (89.7%), reasonable scheduling and wait for time (87.7%) and cost of surgery (82.1%). Physician selection was deemed crucial to the success of the therapy by 87.7% of patients, while 88.3% of patients thought it was crucial to research the doctor before contacting her or him for the current admission. CONCLUSION: Patients consider a wide range of variables when selecting their surgeons and the location of their procedure. Depending on sociodemographic, cultural, and other aspects, the conditions surrounding patients' decisions may vary. Overall, the selection of a surgeon by surgery patients appears to be more influenced by the doctor's attitudes than by his or her reputation, professional experience, or social media presence. In order to elicit preferences across a wider range of surgical subspecialties and patient demographics, more study is necessary.
