ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare their effects on cardiorespiratoy and recovery parameters and side effects. METHODS: This study was performed in The Ministry of Health Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, from January to May 2005. The 40 American Society of Anesthesiology II/III patients were randomized into 2 groups. All patients received remifentanil 0.75 microgram.kg(-1); and then received either etomidate 0.1 mg.kg(-1) (group E, n=20) or propofol 0.5 mg.kg(-1) (group P, n=20). Cardiorespiratory data, induction time, recovery parameters, pain scores, number of shocks (NS), total amount of energy used (TE), side effects, and patient/cardiologist satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: Induction time and recovery parameters were shorter in group P. No differences were seen between the groups in NS and mean TE required. In group P, a statistically significant decrease in mean blood pressure occurred after induction and returned to its baseline levels in 6 minutes. After cardioversion over 2 minutes, the respiratory rates were decreased significantly more in group P when compared with group E. Two patients in group P became apneic and needed assisted ventilation. Pain scores, side effects and patient/cardiologist satisfaction were similar in both groups. No patients in either group had myoclonus. CONCLUSION: We can induce hypnosis with propofol 0.5 mg.kg(-1) or etomidate 0.1 mg.kg(-1) by adding remifentanil 0.75 microgram.kg-1 in cardioversion anesthesia. Although recovery parameters were longer in group E, and cardiorespiratory parameters were less stable in group P, their usage with remifentanil was both acceptable for cardioversion anesthesia.
