Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther ; 10(1): 19-24, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33747768

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Many surgeons use uterine manipulator (UM) during laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of LH operations performed by using partially reusable UM with the articulated system (artUM) and disposable (dUM) UM without articulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 99 patients underwent the LH operation. This study was carried out with 35 of those 99 Caucasian patients who met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 consisted for 7 LH operations using the articulated RUMI® II/KOH-Efficient™ (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) system (artUM), while Group II consisted of 28 patients using old-type V Care®(ConMed Endosurgery, Utica, New York, USA) dUM as UM. RESULTS: Mean operation time was found to be 157.1 ± 42.0 min. The operation time was found statistically longer in Group 1, consisted of artUM used patients (P = 0.006 and P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups in terms of surgical results such as, delta hemoglobin value (P = 0.483 and P < 0.05), length of hospital stay (P = 0.138 and P < 0.05), and postoperative maximum body temperature (P = 0.724 and P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The UM type did not alter the surgical outcomes except the operating time in our study. According to our results, the surgical technique is a more significant variable than instruments used in LH for normal size uterus. Further prospective, large-scale studies comparing various UM systems are mandatory.

2.
Turk J Urol ; 39(3): 170-4, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26328103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequencies of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile azoospermic and oligozoospermic Turkish men and in healthy control subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-four azoospermic and 51 oligozoospermic patients infertile patients, and 70 healthy men who had a child without the aid of assisted reproductive technologies were included in this study. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples collected from the patients. Following multiplex PCR performed with 15 different primer sequences, Y chromosome AZFa, AZFb, AZFc and AZFd region microdeletions were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Y chromosome microdeletions were detected in 8 (12.5%) patients in the azoospermia group and 3 (5.9%) patients in the oligozoospermia group. The overall frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions in all infertile cases was 9.6%. Y chromosome microdeletions were not found in the healthy control group. Among the infertile cases, there were 4 (3.48%) AZFa, 2 (1.74%) AZFb, 3 (2.61%) AZFc and 7 (6.09%) AZFd region microdeletions. Y chromosome microdeletions were not found among healthy men in the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of Y chromosome microdeletions among azoospermic and oligozoospermic infertile males suggests that routine genetic testing and genetic counseling prior to the use of assisted reproduction techniques are necessary.

3.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 8(4): 280-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24501597

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It still remains an unanswered question whether, in the absence of gynecological malignancy and under elective conditions, to perform abdominal hysterectomy (AH), offering a safer approach, or to perform a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) procedure. AIM: We aimed to compare LH operations performed with a tissue fusion device accompanied by intraoperative diagnostic cystoscopy with traditional AH operations involving bilateral ureteral dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The integrity of the ureters, ureteral peristalsis and the diameter of the ureters were examined during AH by inspection. At the end of LH, the bladder wall was systematically evaluated by cystoscopy and a jet of urine spurting was noted from both ureteral orifices. RESULTS: The operation time was longer in patients who underwent LH + CYS (p = 0.0001). The decline in hematocrit and hemoglobin levels in the postoperative period was significantly higher in patients who underwent AH + UD (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.002, respectively). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of ureteral injury, bowel injury or bladder injury (p = 0.378, p = 1.000 and p = 1.000, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean body temperature and postoperative blood transfusion requirements (p = 0.051 and p = 0.210, respectively). Mean parenteral analgesic requirement and length of hospital stay were significantly different between the groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications, re-operation rate or occurrence of genitourinary fistula (p = 1.000, p = 1.000 and p = 1.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that LH performed with a tissue fusion device involving diagnostic cystoscopy yields major and minor complication rates similar to safely performed AH operations preserving ureters.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...