The Effect of Udenafil on Stasis Zone in an Experimental Burn Model.

BACKGROUND: Management of the burn injuries is still a problematic issue because the stasis zone may become necrotic. We hypothesized that udenafil, a potent phospodiesterase inhibitor, can be beneficial in burn treatment by enhancing the viability of the stasis zone. METHODS: Fifteen Wistar rats were randomly divided into 3 groups. Comb burn injury model was conducted bilaterally on the back of rats in each subject. Group 1 received 1 mL/d of saline orally for 7 days. Group 2 received 10 mg/kg per day of udenafil for 7 days. Group 3 received 20 mg/kg per day of udenafil for 7 days. At the end of seventh day, gross morphological and histopathological samples of stasis zone survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Histopathological examination of groups 2 and 3 revealed that the stasis zone was mostly viable. The mean necrotic area and severity of inflammation was significantly higher in the control group compared with the treatment groups. Significant differences were determined in treatment groups compared with control group in terms of vital stasis zone area and histopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Udenafil treatment improved tissue survival on zone of stasis in. Future experimental studies should be conducted to develop zone of stasis treatment protocols combining udenafil with potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs.

Effects of dabigatran and fondaparinux on degloving injuries: An experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Management of the skin degloving injuries is still a problematic issue, and the avulsed part of the skin may become necrotic. We hypothesized that the anticoagulant pharmacological agents, fondaparinux and dabigatran may be beneficial in the treatment of degloving injuries by enhancing the viability of the reattached flap. METHODS: Twenty four Wistar rats were divided into three groups as follows: control group (Group 1), fondaparinux group (Group 2) and dabigatran group (Group 3). A model of a degloving injury on the tail of rats was developed in all groups. After 15 minutes, the avulsed flaps were sutured back. Group 1 received 1ml/day saline intraperitoneally for 10 days. Group 2 received 0.3 ml/kg/day fondaparinux intraperitoneally for 10 days. Group 3 received 30 mg/kg/day dabigatran orally for 10 days. At the end of the treatments, gross morphological and histopathological tail tissue survivals were evaluated. RESULTS: Histopathological examination of the fondaparinux and dabigatran groups revealed that the tail skin was mostly viable with mild inflammation. The mean necrotic length in tails and severity of inflammation was significantly higher in the control group compared to the fondaparinux and dabigatran groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were noted between the fondaparinux and dabigatran groups in histopathologic evaluations. There was no significant difference in necrosis lengths and the other histopathological parameters between dabigatran and fondaparinux groups. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran and fondaparinux improved tissue survival in skin degloving injuries concerning gross morphological and histopathological findings. However, the findings of this study should be supported and improved by new experimental and especially clinical studies.