Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Haematol ; 96(2): 382-6, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9029030

ABSTRACT

We have previously shown that allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with cryopreserved donor marrow cells can be used without prolonging the engraftment time or interfering with the reconstitution of haemopoiesis. In this report we extend our initial observations of the first 40 patients who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from related donors with cryopreserved donor bone marrow for haematological malignancies, including the long-term follow-up data of the previously reported patients. The outcome of these patients was compared with that of 40 related BMT recipients receiving fresh donor bone marrow (historic control group). Time until engraftment of all patients receiving cryopreserved bone marrow was not different from the control group (ANC > 0.5 x 10(9)/l 17d (range 11-24 d) versus 17.5 d (range 10-28 d): platelets > 20 x 10(9)/l 21 d (range 11-85 d) versus 22 d (range 13-69 d), respectively). There was the same incidence of acute and chronic GvHD in patients receiving either cryopreserved bone marrow or fresh bone marrow (acute GvHD > or = II 61% v 60% and chronic GvHD 56% v 52%, respectively). Chimaerism studies showed no difference between the patient groups. Furthermore, the two groups did not differ in day 100 survival (82% v 72%). With a median follow-up of 520 d (range 47-1365 d) and 1289 d (range 48-1849 d), 60% of the patients receiving cryopreserved and 53% of the patients receiving fresh allogeneic donor bone marrow, respectively, are alive. We conclude that cryopreservation of allogeneic related donor bone marrow does not adversely affect engraftment, does not decrease the incidence of severe acute GvHD, and does not seem to affect the day 100 survival or long-term haemopoiesis.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cryopreservation , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Middle Aged , Neutrophils , Survival Rate , Transplantation Chimera , Transplantation, Homologous
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 17(2): 197-9, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8640166

ABSTRACT

Cryopreservation of donor bone marrow can facilitate scheduling allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) by affording independence of a preset time for donation. Previously, we and others have shown the feasibility of using cryopreserved related allogeneic bone marrow. Here, we report the results of the first 10 patients receiving cryopreserved unrelated bone marrow between 1992 and 1995. All evaluable patients (n = 9) engrafted. Time to reach an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.2 x 10(9)/1 and ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 21.4 +/- 9.1 days and 22.6 +/- 9.2 days, respectively. The incidence of acute GVHD > or = grade II and chronic GVHD was 75 and 20%, respectively. Five of nine evaluable patients were alive 100 days post-transplantation. We conclude that cryopreserved unrelated donor bone marrow may be used for allogeneic transplantation.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Bone Marrow , Cryopreservation , Tissue Preservation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aspergillosis/mortality , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Neutrophils , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...