Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis.

On July 31, 2023, the Trifecta valve was withdrawn from the market after concerns regarding early (≤5 years) structural valve deterioration (SVD), mainly as aortic regurgitation (AR). Our aim was to determine the timing, mechanism, and impact of bioprosthetic SVD in patients who underwent redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) with either redo-SAVR or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using Trifecta versus other bioprosthetic valves. Patients who underwent redo-AVR for SVD at our institution were categorized into 2 groups based on the valve type: Trifecta versus non-Trifecta. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare mortality. A total of 171 patients were included; 58 (34%) had previous SAVR with a Trifecta valve and 113 (66%) with non-Trifecta valve. A total of 103 patients (60%) underwent valve-in-valve TAVR and 68 redo-SAVR (40%). The age, gender, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were similar between Trifecta and non-Trifecta groups. In patients with bioprosthetic valves requiring redo-AVR, Trifecta valves had an earlier onset of greater than moderate AR (4.5 vs 11.9 years, p <0.001) and earlier time to redo-AVR (5.5 vs 12 years, p <0.001). AR was more common as the mechanism of SVD in Trifecta versus non-Trifecta valves (55.2% vs 30.1%, p = 0.006). All-cause adjusted mortality from index SAVR was higher in the Trifecta than in non-Trifecta group (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 11.5, p = 0.007). In conclusion, compared with non-Trifecta valves, Trifecta valves exhibit early SVD primarily as AR and progress rapidly to significant SVD requiring redo-AVR. Mortality is significantly higher with Trifecta than in non-Trifecta valves, potentially impacting the results of SAVR versus TAVR studies.

Single-dose cardioplegia protects myocardium as well as traditional repetitive dosing: A noninferiority randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: The present prospective noninferiority randomized trial was designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a single dose of Custodiol histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate compared with repetitive cold-blood cardioplegia. METHODS: From October 2012 to May 2014, 110 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Group 1 (55 patients) received repetitive cold-blood cardioplegia, and group 2 (55 patients) received single-dose Custodiol histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate. Isolated aortic valve replacement, isolated mitral valve replacement, and multivalve procedures represented the most frequent operations, with 39 cases (71%) in group 1 and 49 cases (89%) in group 2. There was no difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time (102 ± 26 minutes vs 99 ± 19 minutes, P = .70) or aortic crossclamp time (77 ± 19 minutes vs 74 ± 17 minutes, P = .33). All patients underwent preoperative electrocardiogram and determination of creatine kinase-MB, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and regional wall motion. Postoperative cardiac biomarkers were checked at 7, 24, and 48 hours, and an echocardiogram was obtained to check for left ventricular function abnormalities. RESULTS: There was no difference in cardiac biomarkers release between the 2 groups at baseline and 7, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (creatine kinase, P = .18, troponin P = .23). Left ventricular function was similar between groups preoperatively and at 24 hours after surgery. No death or myocardial infarction was observed in either group. There were no differences in intensive care unit length of stay, incidence of atrial fibrillation, use of inotropes or vasopressors support, time of intubation, or creatinine levels. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of Custodiol histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate cardioplegia is not inferior to repeated cold-blood cardioplegia during elective cardiac surgery.

Aneurysmal Degeneration in Patients with Type B Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains controversial in the era of endovascular therapies. This study reports the outcomes and complication rates of different treatment paradigms for TBAD. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients with TBAD from June 2006 to June 2012. Demographics, hospital course, and follow-up visits were analyzed. Patients who underwent surgical interventions were compared to those with medical therapy. Survival rates and predictors of outcome were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: Of 261 consecutive patients who were hospitalized during this period with a confirmed thoracic dissection, 134 (51%) had TBAD. Sixty-two (46%) were women, and the mean age was 66.4 ± 14.9. Median follow-up was 22.4 (0, 184) months. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical intervention with 20 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and open surgery in 15. The overall 30-day mortality was 7%, and cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-91), 68% (95% CI, 59-78), and 57% (95% CI, 47-69) with no difference between medical versus surgical groups (P = 0.8) and TEVAR versus open surgery group (P = 1.0). Sixty-six (50%) patients developed aneurysmal expansion, which required surgical intervention in 26 (hazard ratios [HR], 0.99; P = 0.96). Malperfusion and rupture only occurred in 5 (HR, 1.57; P = 0.54) and 5 (HR, 3.64; P = 0.01) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis for overall survival found renal insufficiency (HR, 2.6; P = 0.004) and age (HR, 1.06; P < 0.0001) and rupture (HR 3.3, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of mortality. Intramural hematoma was not a significant predictor of survival (HR, 0.49; P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy remains the mainstay of treating TBAD with low morbidity. Surgical interventions are indicated in selected patients with malperfusion or aneurysmal expansion with comparable survival rates.

Hybrid repair of a ruptured right-sided aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery arising from a diverticulum of Kommerell: a case report.

Right-sided aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery is a rare aortic arch anomaly. Although usually asymptomatic, aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture can occur due to the aberrant vasculature and can be life-threatening. Hybrid, endovascular techniques have been implemented in instances of elective repair of aneurysmal diverticula of Kommerell in similar anatomical settings, but little has been written regarding urgent cases of rupture. We report a case of ruptured right-sided aortic arch with an aberrant left subclavian artery arising from a diverticulum of Kommerell successfully treated with hybrid aortic debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic stenting.

Coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: a prospective, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to determine differences in blood loss and transfusion associated with a minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit versus a standard bypass circuit. METHODS: From February 2005 through April 2006, 199 patients were randomized to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn) or a minimized bypass circuit, the Medtronic Resting Heart Circuit. Laboratory perimeters (hemoglobin and platelet count), were measured at baseline, after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, and on intensive care unit admission. Lowest values recorded were noted. Blood administration was controlled by study-specific protocol orders, (transfusion for hemoglobin <8mg%). Patient demographic data were retrieved from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Blood product administration was recorded during hospital admission, and chest tube drainage as total output collected from operating room to discontinuation. Continuous variables were tested with a Wilcoxin rank test, and categoric variables with X(2) and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Hematocrit, equivalent at baseline, was higher in minimized circuit cohort at lowest point during cariopulmonary bypass (31.5% +/- 3.9% vs. 25.5% +/- 3.7%), after protamine (31.6% +/- 3.9% vs 29.2% +/- 3.7%), and on intensive care unit arrival (35.2% +/- 4.1% vs 31.8% +/- 3.5%, P < .001). Similarly, platelet count was higher in minimized circuit group on intensive care unit arrival, as was lowest platelet count recorded (170 x 10(3) +/- 48 cells/mm(3) vs 107 x 10(3) +/- 28 cells/mm(3), P < .0001). Time to extubation was shorter in minimized circuit group (848 +/- 737 minutes vs. 526 +/- 282 minutes, (P < .01), and total chest tube drainage was lower (1124 +/- 647 mL vs. 506 +/- 214 mL, P < .01). Fewer red blood cells (148 vs 19 units) were given in minimized circuit group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: A minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit provides less hemodilution, platelet consumption, chest tube output and lower post-operative blood loss than standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Red blood cell usage was also less. All differences are advantageous.

The role of temporary biventricular pacing in the cardiac surgical patient with severely reduced left ventricular systolic function.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effects of atrial synchronous biventricular pacing in postoperative patients with severe cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Atrial synchronous biventricular pacing epicardial leads were placed during cardiac surgery in patients with an ejection fraction of 30% or less. Patients were randomized to usual care pacing, the mode determined by the surgeon (excluding atrial synchronous biventricular pacing) with a preference for no pacing or atrial pacing (atrial inhibited pacing); atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing; or atrial synchronous biventricular pacing. Pacing was continued until cessation of hemodynamic support. At 12 hours postoperatively, patients were randomly tested in each mode (atrial inhibited, atrial synchronous right ventricular, and atrial synchronous biventricular pacing), and thermodilution outputs were measured. RESULTS: Forty subjects were randomized. Groups were similar in age (66 +/- 11 years), gender (85% were male), ejection fraction (23% +/- 6%), QRS duration (111 +/- 30 ms), and surgical indication. There was no difference in stroke index or cardiac index at 12 hours, duration of inotropic or intra-aortic balloon pump support, intensive care unit, or hospital length of stay. On comparative crossover testing, stroke volume was similar with atrial inhibited pacing and atrial synchronous biventricular pacing (59.3 +/- 13.4 vs 57 +/- 12.1, respectively, P = not significant); however, atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing was inferior (56 +/- 12.9, P < .05 for comparison with atrial inhibited pacing). When compared with atrial inhibited pacing, atrial synchronous biventricular pacing showed a positive response in 17% of subjects (increase in stroke volume >or= 5%), whereas 41% had a 5% or greater decrease in stroke volume. CONCLUSION: Pacing mode affects stroke volume in patients with severe cardiomyopathy. Atrial synchronous biventricular pacing was helpful in a minority, but in 41% it compromised stroke volume.