Impact of the obesity on lymph node status in operable breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Although many studies have shown association of obesity and tumor size, the association with the lymph node status is not clear. We examined the relationship of the lymph node status and obesity and other possible factors in early breast cancer patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 1295 breast cancer patients who had axillary dissection were included. Patients were grouped according to their body mass index (BMI) values at the time of diagnosis. We analyzed the relationship between BMI and patient and tumor characteristics, especially lymph node status. RESULTS: The median patient age was 48 years (range 20- 84). Of the patients 69.6% had modified radical mastectomy and the remaining 30.4% had breast-conserving surgery and axillary dissection. Median BMI of the patients was 27.2 kg/m(2) and 33.1% (N-429) of them had normal BMI, 36% (N-471) were overweight and 30.5% (N=395) were obese at the time of the diagnosis. Of the patients, 44.2% had N0 disease, and 55.8% had lymph node metastasis. N1 disease had 28.3% (N=367), 13.8% (N=179) had N2 and 13.7% (N=177) had N3 disease. When patients were classified as normal (≤24.9 kg/m(2)) and obese (>24.9 kg/m(2)) group, the total number of lymph nodes removed was higher in the obese group and this difference was statistically significant (18.12±10.48 and 20.36±11.37, respectively, p= 0.001). There was strong correlation between the number of the dissected lymph nodes and BMI (r=0.11; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and BMI. The mean number of the dissected and involved lymph nodes was higher in the HER2 positive group compared to the negative ones (21 vs 19, p=0.008; 6 vs 3, p<0.001; respectively) CONCLUSION: The number of the dissected lymph nodes was slightly higher in obese patients but there was no correlation between metastatic lymph node number and BMI. The number of the dissected and involved lymph nodes was higher in the HER2 positive group.

Comparative efficacy study of 5-year letrozole or anastrozole in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of adjuvant anastrozole and letrozole in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 569 hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer patients were included and analyzed in this study. Of them 238 were taking adjuvant anastrozole and 331 adjuvant letrozole. Demographic and medical data including age, menopausal status, weight, height, treatment history and comorbid diseases were collected from their medical charts. RESULTS: In both anastrozole and letrozole users, the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics and the treatment history with radiotherapy and chemotherapy were similar. The median patient follow-up was 26.4 months. In the anastrozole arm disease free survival (DFS) was 94.9, 81.3 and 66.0%, whereas in the letrozole arm DFS was 90.6, 78.7 and 68.5% in the first, third and fifth years, respectively (p=0.25). Median overall survival (OS) could not be reached due to the low number of events in both arms. Three-year survival rate in the anastrozole arm was 98.8%, whereas in the letrozole arm it was 96.7% (p = 0.20). CONCLUSION: This study showed that both letrozole and anastrozole have similar effects on DFS and OS in the adjuvant hormonal treatment of postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We believe that this retrospective study is the first to directly compare the efficacy of letrozole and anastrozole.

Variations in tumor marker levels in metastatic breast cancer patients according to tumor subtypes.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether serum CA 15-3 and CEA levels show differences among subgroups of breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis of early-stage disease and at disease relapse. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were obtained from medical charts. CA 15-3 and CEA levels of patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis or who relapsed during follow-up were evaluated. Four different breast cancer subtypes were defined: estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and HER-2 negative (luminal A), ER and/or PR positive and HER-2 positive (luminal B), ER and PR negative and HER-2 positive (HER-2 overexpressing) and triple negative (ER, PR and HER-2 negative). Fifty-eight (13.7%) of the patients were metastatic at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: 423 metastatic breast cancer patients were included. Of the patients, 232 (54.8%) had luminal A disease, 70 (16.5%) luminal B, 53 (12.5%) HER-2 overexpressing, and 68 (16.1%) triple negative disease. Preoperative CA 15-3 levels were raised in 48.1% of the luminal A group, in 42.8% of the luminal B group, in 26.0% of the HER-2 overexpressing group, and in 33.3% of the triple negative group. CA 15-3 levels after relapse were raised in 44.5% of the luminal A group, in 33.3% of the luminal B, in 28.9% of the HER-2 overexpressing, and in 38.8% of the triple negative group. Preoperative CEA levels were elevated in 44.3% of the luminal A group, in 28.5% of the luminal B, in 43.4% of the HER-2 overexpressing, and in 14.3% of the triple negative group. CEA levels after relapse were raised in 60.8%, 54.7%, 51.1%, and 36.0% of the patients in the 4 subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there are differences between the breast cancer subgroups in terms of tumor marker levels in metastatic breast cancer patients. Tumor marker elevation was lower in the triple negative group as compared to the luminal groups. Monitoring CEA levels in luminal A group may be beneficial in determining early relapses. However, this retrospective study requires further prospective confirmative cohort studies.

The prognostic impact of obesity on molecular subtypes of breast cancer in premenopausal women.

PURPOSE: The increasing incidence of obesity throughout the world will result in expansion of the number of women at risk for developing breast cancer. Obesity is associated with adverse outcomes in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. In premenopausal women, the association is less clear. We investigated the impact of obesity on tumor features, hormonal status, recurrence and mortality in premenopausal breast cancer patients, classified according to molecular subtypes. METHODS: 818 premenopausal women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were analysed. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to body mass index (BMI): i) normal body weight (BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)); ii) overweight (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/ m(2)); and iii) obese (BMI:>30 kg/ m(2)). Clinocopathologic characteristics and survival rates were analyzed for triple negative, HER-2 overexpressing and luminal subtypes. RESULTS: Obese patients compared with normal-weight women were older at diagnosis (p<0.001) and more often had high grade tumor (57.1 vs 42.3%; p=0.04) with lymphovascular invasion (79.5 vs 63.9%; p=0.03). The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 29 months. According to the molecular subtypes, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were significantly shorter in obese patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (p=0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). Obesity (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.1; p=0.04) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.3- 3.3; p=0.02) were found to be independent prognostic factors for TNBC mortality. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative tumors and poor OS in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Breast cancer in octogenarian women: clinical characteristics and outcome.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer incidence increases in the elderly but data on treatment and outcomes of elderly patients is limited. We assessed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of our patients with breast cancer aged ≥80 years in comparison with their younger postmenopausal counterparts. METHODS: The records of 83 patients diagnosed with breast cancer after the age of 80 (group 1) between 2003 and 2011 in 4 different centers were retrospectively evaluated and the clinicopathological features and outcomes were assessed in comparison with a control group (group 2) of 249 patients aged between 60-70 years. RESULTS: Median ages at diagnosis were 82 years (range 80-95) and 64 years (range 60-70) for group 1 and group 2, respectively. The incidence of invasive cancers other than ductal or lobular type was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (20 vs 8%; p=0.0177rpar;. More patients in group 1 had Charlson Comorbidty scores ≥1 than those in group 2 (49 vs 36%; p=0.011). Patients in group 1 had more conservative operations and less axillary node dissections (ALND) and they received chemotherapy, trastuzumab or radiotherapy less frequently compared to their younger counterparts in group 2. Median follow up period was 36 months (range 1-178) in group 1 and 24 months (range 12-217) in group 2. Five-year disease free survival (DFS) was 53.7 and 75.9) (p=0.005), 5-year overall survival (OS) was 61.9% and 80.47percnt; in group 1 and group 2 (p=0.001), respectively. Advanced stage (stage IV vs stage I, II, III, p=0.051) and cerbB2 positivity (p<0.001) were found to be associated with shorter DFS in patients ≥80 years of age. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of patients were undertreated in our study according to the current guidelines, mortality rates were quite low. Different biology of the disease in the elderly might explain this difference.

Evaluation of changes in biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 index in breast cancer with administration of neoadjuvant dose dense doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the changes in biologic markers of breast cancer ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 in locally advanced breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from 63 locally advanced breast cancer patients (stage II or III), whose histological diagnosis was made by core biopsies were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were given 4 cyles of 600 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide, 60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin every 15 days followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 15 days, and they underwent surgery within two weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. Expressions in the preoperative and postoperative status of ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 were compared. RESULTS: The patient mean age was 49.2 ±10.7 years and most (57.1%) were premenopausal. Clinical stages of patients ranged between T2N1 and T3N2. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 14.9 % (N=9). Two (5.7%) patients who were ER positive prior to treatment showed ER negativity after treatment. In 7 (21.17percnt;) patients PR became negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in 3 (9.0%) patients PR became positive. Changes in ER and PR receptors were not statistically significant (ER p=0.500 and PR p=0.549, respectively), whereas in 2 (5. 8%) patients hormonal status changed significantly when compared to initial biopsies (p=0.003). In addition, median value for PR intensity decreased from 20 to 10% (p=0.003) and Ki-67 values decreased from 10 to 1% (p<0.001) following neoadjuvant therapy. Six (17%) patients exhibited some changes in HER 2 staining. HER 2 expression became 2+ in 3 patients who were HER 2 negative prior to treatment, and HER 2 expression became negative in two patients with HER 2 1+ and 2+ prior to treatment following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The biological markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki- 67 index demonstrated differences after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. These changes may affect the treatment decision.

Evaluation of changes of biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 in breast cancer with administration of neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To assess the changes of biologic markers estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), HER 2 and Ki-67 in locally advanced breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Data from 63 locally advanced breast cancer patients (stage II or III), whose histological diagnosis was made by core biopsies were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were given 4 cycles of 600 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide, 60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin every 15 days, followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), followed by mastectomy within 2 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. The changes in ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 status of the operated tumor tissue were compared with the material obtained by initial core biopsies. RESULTS: The patient mean age was 49.2±10.7 years. Most (57.1%) were premenopausal. Clinical disease stages ranged between T2N1 and T3N2. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 14.9 7 percent; (n=9). Two (5.7%) patients who were ER positive prior to treatment showed ER negativity after treatment. In 7 (21.1%) patients PR became negative and in 3 (9.0%) became positive after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in ER and PR receptors were not statistically significant (p=0.500 and PR p=0.549, respectively), whereas in 2 (5.8%) patients hormonal status changed significantly when compared to initial biopsies (p=0.003). In addition, the median value of PR intensity decreased from 20 to 10% (p=0.003) and Ki-67 decreased from 10 to 1% (p<0.001) following neoadjuvant therapy. Five (14.1%) patients exhibited some changes in HER 2 expression: HER 2 expression became 2+ in 3 patients previously being HER 2 negative, and in 2 patients HER 2 became negative whilst it was 1+ and 2+ prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: It was observed that the biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67, from the same tumor material demonstrated differences after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. These changes may affect the treatment decision.