One-year experience in patients treated with auranofin following completion of a parallel, controlled trial comparing auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo.

Following a 21-week double-blind trial that compared the effects of treatment with auranofin (AUR), gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in 193 patients, 147 patients entered a 1-year, open-label study of treatment with AUR (6 mg/day). Results of this open-label study suggest that AUR has a long-term use profile similar to that of other slow-acting antirheumatic drugs. AUR appears to be capable of sustaining an initial response to gold sodium thiomalate. The withdrawal rate remains relatively high: Nearly half of the study patients had discontinued AUR by the end of 1 year.

Folate status of rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving long-term, low-dose methotrexate therapy.

The folate status of 29 healthy control subjects, 16 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking methotrexate (MTX), and 20 RA patients who were not being treated with MTX was estimated by an assay of the folate-dependent enzymatic synthesis of serine from formate and glycine, which is termed the C1 index. Analysis of variance demonstrated that the specific activity of the enzyme system in lymphocytes was significantly lower in the MTX-treated group, with an activity approximately one-half that of the control and the non-MTX-treated groups. Since the C1 index is one of the first biochemical parameters found to be different between MTX-treated and non-MTX-treated groups, alterations in folate-mediated amino acid metabolism may be involved in the mechanism of response to MTX therapy. Use of the C1 index may assist in the development of protocols which preserve the efficacy of MTX therapy while minimizing toxicity.

Cryptococcosis associated with low-dose methotrexate for arthritis.

One patient with psoriatic arthritis and a second with rheumatoid arthritis were each treated with low-dose methotrexate (10 to 15 mg per week, orally) for more than a year before pulmonary cryptococcosis developed. These are the first case reports of opportunistic fungal disease during this treatment. Low-dose methotrexate may be more immunosuppressive than has been appreciated. Patients demonstrating pneumonitis while receiving this therapy should be carefully evaluated to rule out an infectious cause.

Lack of correlation between blood gold concentrations and clinical response in patients with definite or classic rheumatoid arthritis receiving auranofin or gold sodium thiomalate.

We investigated the correlation between whole blood gold concentrations and clinical outcomes in 59 auranofin-treated patients and 51 gold sodium thiomalate-treated patients who completed a 21-week, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel trial. Whole blood gold concentrations did not correlate with clinical outcome, as assessed by changes in joint tenderness, joint swelling, or Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate. They also did not correlate with toxic reactions necessitating withdrawal from the study.

Outcome assessment in clinical trials. Evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure.

Health status measures are conceptually relevant to the assessment of clinical outcome in the rheumatic diseases, but their ability to detect meaningful changes in health has not been clearly demonstrated. This report describes the performance of a self-administered health status questionnaire in a randomized, double-blind, 21-week comparison of placebo, oral gold, and injectable gold in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Outcome was assessed by standard clinical measures, including joint count, grip strength, and laboratory tests, and by the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, a reliable and valid health status measure that assesses physical disability, psychological status, and pain. Data from the clinical and health status measures produced highly similar conclusions: injectable and oral gold are more effective than placebo for rheumatoid arthritis, and injections are slightly more effective than oral gold. The health status measure was thus quite sensitive to clinically meaningful drug-induced improvements. These findings provide justification for the further application of health status measures to clinical trials of chronic disease.

Auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Cooperative systematic studies of rheumatic diseases.

Two hundred eight patients were studied in a prospective, controlled, double-blind multicenter trial comparing auranofin (AUR), gold sodium thiomalate (GST), and placebo. One hundred sixty-one patients completed at least 20 weeks of therapy. Response to a variety of measures of efficacy was generally modest for both gold treatment groups although improvement was continuing in both groups at the end of the study. There was statistically significant improvement with both gold preparations compared to placebo for the number of tender joints, the joint tenderness score, and physician assessment of disease severity. GST was also significantly better than placebo for the joint swelling score. GST demonstrated more improvement in patients with anemia and thrombocytosis compared to the other treatment groups and both gold preparations were superior to placebo in improvement of an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Twenty-seven percent of patients on GST were withdrawn from the study for adverse drug reaction with rash and stomatitis being the predominant cause. Only 6% of patients on AUR were withdrawn for untoward drug effect. The time of onset of the adverse reactions is discussed. The two gold preparations were similar in efficacy although AUR was better tolerated.

Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled clinical trial.

A prospective controlled, double-blind multicenter trial compared placebo, auranofin (an orally administered gold complex), and parenteral gold sodium thiomalate (GST) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Of 193 patients who received any treatment, the only important improvement identified for either auranofin or GST was for pain/tenderness scores. When 161 patients who completed 20 weeks of treatment were examined, both auranofin and GST treatments were superior to placebo as measured by improvement in number of painful and/or tender joints, joint pain/tenderness scores, physician's assessment of disease activity, and decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate when elevated at entry. GST was superior to placebo in improvement of joint swelling scores, anemia, thrombocytosis, and rheumatoid factor. No drug-related remissions were observed. The only statistically significant advantages of GST over auranofin for efficacy were an increase in hemoglobin concentration and decrease of thrombocytosis with GST. Withdrawals for adverse effects were 5 times more frequent with GST treatment. Thrombocytopenia, proteinuria, elevated liver enzymes, "nitritoid" reactions, and "gold pneumonitis" were observed only in the GST treatment group. These results confirm that both parenteral and oral gold may be effective for the treatment of RA, that GST tends to show greater efficacy than auranofin, and that auranofin has fewer significant adverse effects than GST. However, long-term benefits, tolerability, and safety cannot be inferred from this study.