Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Food Prot ; 71(11): 2217-22, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19044264

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted in 2006 to determine the prevalence of Salmonella on three cantaloupe farms in Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico, and on one farm that cultivates chile peppers var. Bell in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. Samples from cantaloupe farms consisted of cantaloupe rinses, irrigation water, water from furrows in the field, and workers' hands. Samples from the chile pepper farm consisted of rinses of chile peppers obtained at the field, pepper rinses obtained at the packing house, and irrigation water from the field. A total of 55 samples were obtained from both production systems. Twelve and 10 samples from the cantaloupe and chile pepper production systems, respectively, tested positive for Salmonella according to a traditional culture method. The difference between the proportion of Salmonella-positive samples from the cantaloupe production system (12 of 28 = 0.43) and the chile pepper production system (10 of 27 = 0.37) was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method based on the fliC gene was used to determine the serotype of the isolates. Salmonella Typhimurium was the only serotype found associated with the cantaloupe production system, whereas both Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis serotypes were found associated with the chile pepper production system. Results showed that 91% (20 of 22) and 9% (2 of 22) of the isolates from both agricultural systems matched with the Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis reference strain restriction profiles, respectively. This study demonstrates the utility of the PCR-RFLP technique for determining the serotypes of Salmonella isolates obtained from cantaloupe and chile pepper production systems.


Subject(s)
Capsicum/microbiology , Cucumis melo/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Food Contamination/analysis , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Food Packaging/methods , Mexico , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella enteritidis/classification , Salmonella enteritidis/genetics , Salmonella enteritidis/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhimurium/classification , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serotyping , Water Microbiology
2.
Prev Vet Med ; 87(3-4): 261-71, 2008 Nov 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18524398

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) represents a barrier for free trade of livestock between Mexico and the United States of America (US). In spite of efforts from Mexico to export TB-free animals, some of those found with TB lesions in slaughterhouses in the US are traced back to that country. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine, through molecular epidemiology, the most probable source of infection for cattle found with TB lesions in the US. Ninety M. bovis isolates, 50 from Mexico obtained from cattle in 8 different states, and 40 from the US from cattle, deer, elk and feral pigs from 7 different states were included in the study. All samples were analyzed in both laboratories, Mexico and the US, following the same protocol for molecular analysis by spoligotyping. Twenty-seven clusters, ranging from 1 to 18 genetically similar strains were found. Some clustering by country was observed, strains from cattle and deer in Michigan in the US fell into the same cluster, suggesting transmission between species. These results, combined with epidemiological information suggest that despite of the possibility that some animals with lesions in the US come from Mexico as false negatives, the US has its own source of infection, must probably in dairy cattle and wildlife. Genetic diversity of isolates from Mexico was larger than that in the US, which could be a consequence of the endemic status of the disease and the indiscriminate movement of animals between regions.


Subject(s)
Molecular Epidemiology , Mycobacterium bovis/genetics , Tuberculosis/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Commerce , Deer , Internationality , Mexico/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Swine , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
3.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 15(6): 911-5, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18385457

ABSTRACT

The performance of the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) using the recently described Brucella melitensis native hapten and the Brucella abortus O-polysaccharide tracer was evaluated and compared with those of The World Organization for Animal Health tests related to indirect and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as classification variables for goat sera obtained from a high-prevalence area where vaccination was performed; test series were also evaluated to increase the final specificity of the tests. Our results showed that the respective relative sensitivity and specificity were 99.7% and 32.5% for the rose Bengal test with a 3% cell concentration (RBT3), 92.8% and 68.8% for the rose Bengal test with 8% cell concentration (RBT8), 98.4% and 84.9% for the Canadian complement fixation test (CFT), 83.7% and 65.5% for the Mexican CFT, 98.4% and 81.0% for the buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), and 78.1% and 89.3% for the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA). The use of the FPA as the secondary test significantly increased the final specificities of test combinations; the screening tests BPAT, RBT3, and RBT8 plus FPA resulted in 90%, 91.2%, and 91.3% final specificities, respectively, whereas for the combinations RBT3 plus Mexican CFT, RBT8 plus Mexican CFT, and BPAT plus Canadian CFT, the specificities were 65.5%, 63.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. The results suggested that the FPA may be routinely applied as an adaptable screening test for diagnosis of goat brucellosis, since its cutoff can be adjusted to improve its sensitivity or specificity, it is a rapid and simple test, it can be the test of choice when specificity is relevant or when an alternative confirmatory test is not available, and it is not affected by vaccination, thus reducing the number of goats wrongly slaughtered due to misdiagnosis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brucella melitensis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/microbiology , Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay/veterinary , Goat Diseases/diagnosis , Haptens/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Cattle , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay/methods , Goat Diseases/immunology , Goats , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...