Health-Related Quality of Life Long-Term Study in Lung Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment plays a crucial role in the follow-up care of lung transplanted (LTx) patients. Previous reports have indicated that the HRQL achieved by these patients is often poorer compared to that of healthy individuals. However, the factors contributing to this lower HRQL remain unclear. This prospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using both a generic and a disease-specific HRQL instrument in evaluating the outcomes of patients who have undergone LTx. METHODS: A total of 111 LTx patients were enrolled in the study, with 88 survivors completing the 5-year follow-up and 23 nonsurvivors identified within the first 3 y. Among the participants, 84 underwent double LTx, while 27 received a single LTx. Patients were interviewed before LTx, at 6 mo post-transplantation, and annually thereafter. Two validated instruments were utilized: the Euro quality of life five dimensions, a generic measure, and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), a disease-specific questionnaire. RESULTS: The study showed significant improvements in Euro Quality of Life five Dimensions scores from 6 mo after LTx. Specifically, the percentage of patients without Mobility problems increased from 23% before LTx to 71% at 5 y (P = <0.001), while the ability to self-care improved from 48% to 100% (P = <0.001). The ability to carry out usual activities improved from 13% to 86% (P = <0.001), and the proportion of patients without anxiety and depression increased from 50% to 86% (P > 0.004). However, there was no significant improvement observed in Pain, with only a slight reduction from 57% to 42.8% (P = 0.22). The SGRQ also showed improvements in all dimensions (symptoms, impact, activities) (P < 0.001). However, by the fifth year, the HRQL scores remained below normal reference values. Chronic graft dysfunction was associated with a decline in SGRQ scores. Bilateral LTx patients exhibited better SGRQ scores compared to unilateral LTx patients from the first year post-transplantation. Notably, there were no differences in scores between nonsurvivors and survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the long-term improvement in HRQL among LTx patients, with greater improvements observed in physical dimensions compared to psychological dimensions. Bilateral LTx was associated with better SGRQ scores than unilateral LTx, and chronic graft dysfunction primarily affected SGRQ scores. These findings underscore the importance of utilizing both generic and specific HRQL instruments in assessing LTx outcomes.

EARLY COPD: determinantes de la aparición y progresión de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en adultos jóvenes. Protocolo de un estudio caso-control con seguimiento / Determinants of the Appearance and Progression of Early-Onset Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Young Adults. A Case-Control Study with Follow-up

Introducción y objetivos: Los determinantes en fases iniciales de la historia natural de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) son poco conocidos. Entenderlos mejor es de capital importancia para poder diseñar intervenciones dirigidas a modificar su pronóstico. Los principales objetivos del estudio son: a) caracterizar a una población de adultos jóvenes con EPOC de forma multidimensional; b) comparar estos pacientes con sujetos fumadores con función pulmonar normal; y c) establecer una cohorte de adultos jóvenes con y sin EPOC, que pueda ser seguida a largo plazo para conocer mejor la historia natural de la enfermedad. Participantes y método: EARLY COPD es un estudio multicéntrico de casos y controles que permitirá establecer una cohorte de sujetos para su seguimiento posterior. Se seleccionaron 311 (101 casos y 210 controles) participantes reclutados en una treintena de centros de atención primaria y 12 hospitales de 8 comunidades autónomas españolas. Los participantes eran fumadores o exfumadores (>10 paquetes año) de entre 35-50 años de edad. Los casos presentaban una espirometría obstructiva con un FEV1/FVC<70% y los controles una espirometría normal con un FEV1/FVC≥70%. Las principales variables de estudio que se han determinado son las siguientes: cuestionarios de salud, síntomas, exacerbaciones y actividad física, pruebas de función respiratoria, análisis biológicos de sangre y esputo y TAC de baja radiación. Para el análisis estadístico de los resultados se describirán las características de los pacientes con EPOC y se compararán con los sujetos del grupo control mediante un modelo de regresión logística

Introduction and objectives: Determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the early stages of its natural history are not well known. Improving our knowledge of these factors will help to design interventions that can modify prognosis. Study objectives are: a) to characterize a COPD population of young adults aged 35-50 years from a multidimensional point of view; b) to compare these patients with smokers with normal lung function; and c) to create a cohort of young adults aged 35-50 years (smokers or former smokers), with and without COPD, who will be followed in the future to improve understanding of the natural history of the disease. Participants and method: This is a case-control multicenter study aimed at establishing a well-characterized cohort of young adults, smokers or former-smokers, with and without COPD, for subsequent follow-up. A total of 311 participants (101 cases and 210 controls) were selected from approximately 30 primary care settings and 12 hospitals in 8 Spanish regions. Subjects were smokers or former smokers (>10 pack-years) aged 35-50 years. Diagnosis of COPD was based on a post-bronchodilator result of FEV1/FVC<70%. The main study variables were: questionnaires on health, symptoms, exacerbations and daily physical activity, lung function tests, blood and sputum samples, and low-dose computed tomography. In the statistical analysis, COPD patient characteristics will be described and compared with control subjects using a logistic regression analysis

Determinants of the Appearance and Progression of Early-Onset Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Young Adults. A Case-Control Study with Follow-up. / EARLY COPD: determinantes de la aparición y progresión de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en adultos jóvenes. Protocolo de un estudio caso-control con seguimiento.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Determinants of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the early stages of its natural history are not well known. Improving our knowledge of these factors will help to design interventions that can modify prognosis. Study objectives are: a) to characterize a COPD population of young adults aged 35-50 years from a multidimensional point of view; b) to compare these patients with smokers with normal lung function; and c) to create a cohort of young adults aged 35-50 years (smokers or former smokers), with and without COPD, who will be followed in the future to improve understanding of the natural history of the disease. PARTICIPANTS AND METHOD: This is a case-control multicenter study aimed at establishing a well-characterized cohort of young adults, smokers or former-smokers, with and without COPD, for subsequent follow-up. A total of 311 participants (101 cases and 210 controls) were selected from approximately 30 primary care settings and 12 hospitals in 8 Spanish regions. Subjects were smokers or former smokers (>10 pack-years) aged 35-50 years. Diagnosis of COPD was based on a post-bronchodilator result of FEV1/FVC<70%. The main study variables were: questionnaires on health, symptoms, exacerbations and daily physical activity, lung function tests, blood and sputum samples, and low-dose computed tomography. In the statistical analysis, COPD patient characteristics will be described and compared with control subjects using a logistic regression analysis.

La auditoría clínica y su circunstancia / Clinical audit: Why, where and how?

No disponible

Normativa sobre el manejo del nódulo pulmonar solitario / Guideline on Management of Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

Las recomendaciones que se proponen pretenden ser un instrumento que facilite la toma de decisiones en pacientes con nódulo pulmonar solitario (NPS). Para una decisión óptima hay que incorporar la accesibilidad a las distintas técnicas diagnósticas y las preferencias del paciente. La primera valoración, que incluye la tomografía computarizada torácica, separa a un grupo de pacientes con neoplasia extrapulmonar o muy alto riesgo quirúrgico que requieren manejo individualizado. Otros 2 grupos son los pacientes con NPS de hasta 8 mm y los que tienen NPS subsólido, para los que se establecen recomendaciones específicas. Los NPS mayores de 8 mm se clasifican según su probabilidad de malignidad en baja (menor del 5%) donde se recomienda observación, alta (mayor del 65%) que se manejan con el diagnóstico de presunción de carcinoma en estadio localizado, e intermedia, donde la tomografía de emisión de positrones tiene gran rendimiento para reclasificarlos en alta o baja probabilidad. En los casos de probabilidad de malignidad intermedia o alta puede ser una opción la punción o biopsia transbronquial del nódulo. Se recomienda la observación radiológica con tomografía computarizada de baja radiación y sin contraste en el NPS con baja probabilidad de malignidad, y la resección con videotoracoscopia en los casos no diagnosticados y con probabilidad de malignidad intermedia o alta

The aim of the proposed recommendations is to be a tool to facilitate decision-making in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). For an optimal decision, accessibility to the different diagnostics techniques and patient preferences need to be incorporated. The first assessment, which includes a chest computed tomography scan, separates a group of patients with extrapulmonary neoplasm or a high surgical risk who require individualized management. Another two groups of patients are patients with SPN up to 8 mm and those who have a subsolid SPN, for which specific recommendations are established. SPNs larger than 8 mm are classified according to their probability of malignancy into low (less than 5%), where observation is recommended, high (higher than 65%), which are managed with a presumptive diagnosis of localized stage carcinoma, and intermediate, where positron emission tomography-computed tomography has high yield for reclassifying them into high or low probability. In cases of intermediate or high probability of malignancy, transbronchial needle aspiration or biopsy of the nodule may be an option. Radiologic observation with low radiation computed tomography without contrast is recommended in SPN with low probability of malignancy, and resection with videothoracoscopy in undiagnosed cases with intermediate or high probability of malignancy

Guideline on management of solitary pulmonary nodule.

The aim of the proposed recommendations is be a tool to facilitate decision-making in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). For an optimal decision, accessibility to the different diagnostics techniques and patient preferences need to be incorporated. The first assessment, which includes a chest computed tomography scan, separates a group of patients with extrapulmonary neoplasm or a high surgical risk who require individualized management. Another two groups of patients are patients with SPN up to 8mm and those who have a subsolid SPN, for which specific recommendations are established. SPN larger than 8mm are classified according to their probability of malignancy into low (less than 5%), where observation is recommended, high (higher than 65%), which are managed with a presumptive diagnosis of localized stage carcinoma, and intermediate, where positron emission tomography-computed tomography has high yield for reclassifying them into high or low probability. In cases of intermediate or high probability of malignancy, transbronchial needle aspiration or biopsy of the nodule may be an option. Radiologic observation with low radiation computed tomography without contrast is recommended in SPN with low probability of malignancy, and resection with videothoracoscopy in undiagnosed cases with intermediate or high probability of malignancy.

Clinical audit of COPD patients requiring hospital admissions in Spain: AUDIPOC study.

BACKGROUNDS: AUDIPOC is a nationwide clinical audit that describes the characteristics, interventions and outcomes of patients admitted to Spanish hospitals because of an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD), assessing the compliance of these parameters with current international guidelines. The present study describes hospital resources, hospital factors related to case recruitment variability, patients' characteristics, and adherence to guidelines. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: An organisational database was completed by all participant hospitals recording resources and organisation. Over an 8-week period 11,564 consecutive ECOPD admissions to 129 Spanish hospitals covering 70% of the Spanish population were prospectively identified. At hospital discharge, 5,178 patients (45% of eligible) were finally included, and thus constituted the audited population. Audited patients were reassessed 90 days after admission for survival and readmission rates. A wide variability was observed in relation to most variables, hospital adherence to guidelines, and readmissions and death. Median inpatient mortality was 5% (across-hospital range 0-35%). Among discharged patients, 37% required readmission (0-62%) and 6.5% died (0-35%). The overall mortality rate was 11.6% (0-50%). Hospital size and complexity and aspects related to hospital COPD awareness were significantly associated with case recruitment. Clinical management most often complied with diagnosis and treatment recommendations but rarely (<50%) addressed guidance on healthy life-styles. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The AUDIPOC study highlights the large across-hospital variability in resources and organization of hospitals, patient characteristics, process of care, and outcomes. The study also identifies resources and organizational characteristics associated with the admission of COPD cases, as well as aspects of daily clinical care amenable to improvement.