Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine / Evaluación de la tolerancia a la mercaptopurina en los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal e intolerancia gastrointestinal a la azatioprina

Background Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated.AimsTo assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP.MethodsA prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP.ResultsThirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA.ConclusionsUp to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge–rechallenge–switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients. (AU)

Antecedentes Las tiopurinas como la azatioprina (AZA) y la mercaptopurina (MP) se utilizan comúnmente para tratar la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Su uso está frecuentemente restringido debido a la intolerancia gastrointestinal. Estudios retrospectivos anteriores han informado que los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA pueden beneficiarse de un cambio a MP; sin embargo, la eficacia de esta estrategia no ha sido evaluada prospectivamente.ObjetivosEvaluar la tolerancia gastrointestinal a MP en pacientes que son intolerantes a AZA e identificar predictores clínicos de intolerancia gastrointestinal a AZA o MP.MétodosSe realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional y de cohorte única en 92 pacientes con EII que nunca habían recibido tiopurinas. Comenzaron con una dosis de 50mg de AZA y se aumentó a 2,5mg/kg por día en la semana 2. En aquellos con intolerancia gastrointestinal se administró una dosis del 50% de AZA que se fue incrementando en función de la tolerancia. Si los síntomas persistían, se cambiaba a MP.ResultadosTreinta (32,6%) de los pacientes reclutados presentaron intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA. De estos, 15 no presentaron recurrencia de los síntomas después de la nueva exposición. De los 15 pacientes que no toleraron una dosis más baja, 14 recibieron MP. De los que recibieron MP, 8 pacientes (57%) también eran intolerantes a MP, 5 (36%) no tenían síntomas y uno (7%) se perdió durante el seguimiento. El género femenino fue el único predictor independiente de intolerancia gastrointestinal a la AZA.ConclusionesHasta la mitad de los pacientes intolerantes a la AZA toleran una nueva exposición al 50% de la dosis. Se toleró un cambio a MP en más de un tercio de los casos en los que la reexposición fracasó. Nuestra estrategia logró la tolerancia gastrointestinal a tiopurinas en la mayoría de los pacientes. (AU)

Evaluation of tolerance to mercaptopurine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal intolerance to azathioprine.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are commonly utilized to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Their use is frequently restricted due to gastrointestinal intolerance (GI). Previous retrospective studies have reported that AZA-intolerant patients may benefit from a switch to MP; yet the effectiveness of this strategy has not been prospectively evaluated. AIMS: To assess GI tolerance to MP in patients who are intolerant to AZA, and to identify clinical predictors of GI intolerance to AZA or MP. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-cohort study was performed in 92 thiopurine-naïve IBD patients. They were started on a 50mg dose of AZA and escalated to 2.5mg/kg per day by week 2. Those with GI intolerance were rechallenged with a 50% dose of AZA, after which another dose escalation attempt was made. If symptoms persisted, they were switched to MP. RESULTS: Thirty (32.6%) of the recruited patients suffered from GI intolerance to AZA. Of these, 15 did not present recurrence of symptoms after rechallenge with lower doses. Of 15 intolerant patients, 14 were switched to MP. Within the MP cohort, 8 patients (57%) were also intolerant to MP, 5 (36%) had no symptoms, and 1 (7%) was lost to follow-up. Female gender was the only independent predictor of GI intolerance to AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Up to half of the AZA-intolerant patients tolerated a 50% dose rechallenge that was successfully escalated. A switch to MP was tolerated in over a third of cases whom rechallenge failed. Our strategy (challenge-rechallenge-switch) achieved an overall GI tolerance to thiopurines in most of the patients.

Adsorptive granulocyte/monocyte apheresis use in severe ulcerative colitis and determination of changes in plasma cytokines.

Despite controversy regarding the use of granulocyte/monocyte adsorption (GMA) in inflammatory bowel disease, some studies have shown favorable outcomes when it is used in steroid-dependent patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The mechanisms responsible for such outcomes are not well characterized, but changes in immune cell populations and cytokine levels have been suggested to play an important role. We report the cases of 3 patients with chronically active severe UC who underwent GMA due to an inadequate response to standard and rescue therapy, as well as changes to their plasma cytokine profile. All the patients presented severe UC that was only partially responsive to various immunosuppressive drugs, and they were, therefore, referred for colectomy; however, all 3 refused this option, which led to the compassionate use of GMA as a last therapeutic resort. Following GMA treatment, rapid normalization of the clinical, endoscopic and laboratory parameters was observed in all the patients. Despite having achieved a good response, most cytokines remained at high concentrations after GMA, and only two, IL-6 and IL-8, showed a clear decrease throughout the GMA sessions. In view of this outcome, we hypothesize that GMA can help to lower the inflammatory load, thereby enhancing the effect of biologic drugs. To confirm this hypothesis and explore further indications for GMA, we propose the need for research directed toward the characterization of immune cell populations and their specific cytokine production rather than global cytokine assessment.

Immunological Mechanisms of Adsorptive Cytapheresis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study of immunological pathways involved in the onset of IBD is of fundamental importance to identify potential biological markers of disease activity and specific targets for therapy. Removing excess and activated circulating leukocytes with adsorptive cytapheresis has been shown to be a potentially effective treatment for patients with an inflamed bowel. Adsorptive cytapheresis is a non-pharmacological approach for active IBD, in which known sources of inflammatory cytokines such as activated myeloid lineage leucocytes are selectively depleted from the circulatory system. The decrease in inflammatory load caused by removing these cells is thought to enhance drug therapy and thereby promote disease remission. The benefit of cytapheresis appears to rest upon its ability to reduce levels of certain immune cell populations; however, whether this depletion results in further changes in lymphocyte populations and cytokine production needs further clarification. In this review, we aim to summarize existing evidence on the role of cytapheresis in patients with IBD, its effect on cytokine levels and cellular populations, and to discuss its potential impact on disease activity.

Decreased Esophageal Sensitivity to Acid in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Cause for Concern?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate esophageal sensitivity to acid between morbidly obese (MO) patients and non-MO controls with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 58 patients: 30 MO (cases) and 28 non-MO (controls). Esophageal symptoms and esophageal sensitivity to 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution (Bernstein test) were compared between MO and non-MO patients with a prior diagnosis of abnormal esophageal acid exposure. RESULTS: MO patients were less symptomatic than non-MO controls (14% vs 96%; odds ratio [OR], 0.006; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001 to 0.075; p=0.000). MO patients were more likely to present with decreased esophageal sensitivity to the instillation of acid than non-MO controls (57% vs 14%; OR, 8; 95% CI, 1.79 to 35.74; p=0.009). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences in esophageal sensitivity in MO patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure (43% vs 31%; p=0.707). CONCLUSIONS: Silent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common among MO individuals, likely due to decreased esophageal sensitivity to acid. The absence of typical GERD symptoms in these patients may delay discovery of precancerous conditions, such as Barrett's esophagus. We believe that these patients may require a more aggressive diagnostic work-up to rule out the presence of silent GERD.

Albumin dialysis with MARS for the treatment of anabolic steroid-induced cholestasis.

 Background and aims. Steroid-related hepatotoxicity has become one of the most relevant causes of drug induced liver cholestasis. Some patients do not improve after standard medical treatment (SMT) and may therefore require other approaches, like extracorporeal liver support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report four cases of patients with pruritus, abnormal liver function tests and biopsy-proven anabolic steroid-induced cholestasis who were unresponsive to SMT. They underwent treatment with albumin dialysis (Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System -MARS®-). A minimum of two MARS sessions were performed. RESULTS: After MARS® procedure, patients' symptoms improved, as well as liver function tests, thus avoiding liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: Albumin dialysis appears as a valuable therapeutic option for the management of anabolic steroid-induced cholestasis in patients that are unresponsive to SMT.

Controlling Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: Room for Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness with great impact on long-term outcome after liver transplantation (LT). Despite this, the current level of glycemic control and quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions that are being provided to liver transplant recipients with diabetes have not yet been assessed. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study that included 344 liver transplant recipients and examined the level of glycemic control and its associated factors, as well as the quality of screening strategies for diabetes-associated conditions. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (21.8%) suffered from diabetes before transplantation, and 82 (23.8%) developed diabetes mellitus after transplantation. Adequate glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%) was achieved in 66.7% of the patients. Forty-eight percent of patients underwent regular screening for retinopathy, 47.1% for nephropathy, 4.5% for neuropathy, and 5.7% for foot ulcers. Diabetes was associated with higher frequency of cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia both before and after LT. Multivariate analysis revealed association between poor glycemic control and arterial hypertension, presence of diabetes before transplantation, elevated GGT, and insulin use. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control was inadequate in 33.3% of LT recipients with diabetes, and screening protocols for diabetes-associated conditions did not meet the standards for medical care set by the American Diabetes Association in any of the participating centers. Consequently, this study reveals a clear deficiency in the quality of diabetes care provided to patients after LT and, hence, we predict that future progress in this area will have a significant impact on medium-term to long-term outcome of these patients.

Long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory disease involving the large intestine (colon). Treatment seeks to break recurrent inflammation episodes by inducing and maintaining remission. Historically, oral systemic corticosteroids played an important role in inducing remission of this chronic disease; however, their long-term use is limited and can lead to adverse events. Budesonide is a synthetic steroid with potent local anti-inflammatory effects and low systemic bioavailability due to high first-pass hepatic metabolism. Several studies have demonstrated oral budesonide's usefulness in treating active mild to moderate ileocecal Crohn's disease and microscopic colitis and in an enema formulation for left sided UC. However, there is limited information regarding oral budesonide's efficacy in UC. A novel oral budesonide formulation using a multimatrix system (budesonide-MMX) to extend drug release throughout the colon has been developed recently and seems to be an effective treatment in active left sided UC patients. This article summarizes budesonide's long-term safety and efficacy in treating UC.