ABSTRACT
Hemodiafiltration (HDF) increases the removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins and may improve outcomes in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but it requires complex equipment and comes with risks associated with infusion of large volumes of substitution solution. New high-flux hemodialysis membranes with improved diffusive permeability profiles do not have these limitations and offer an attractive alternative to HDF. However, both strategies are associated with increased albumin loss into the dialysate, raising concerns about the potential for decreased serum albumin concentrations that have been associated with poor outcomes in ESKD. Many factors can contribute to hypoalbuminemia in ESKD, including protein energy wasting, inflammation, volume expansion, renal loss and loss into the dialysate; of these factors, loss into the dialysate is not necessarily the most important. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that mild hypoalbuminemia per se is not an independent predictor of increased mortality in dialysis patients, but in combination with inflammation it is a poor prognostic sign. Thus, whether hypoalbuminemia predisposes to increased morbidity and mortality may depend on the presence or absence of inflammation. In this review we summarize recent findings on the role of dialysate losses in hypoalbuminemia and the importance of concomitant inflammation on outcomes in patients with ESKD. Based on these findings, we discuss whether hypoalbuminemia may be a price worth paying for increased dialytic removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins.
