An Interdisciplinary, Comprehensive Recovery Pathway Improves Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Delivery.

INTRODUCTION: Free-flap (autologous) breast reconstruction demonstrates superiority over alloplastic approaches but is offered infrequently. Enhanced recovery protocols can address postoperative challenges, but most literature is limited to inpatient interventions and outcomes. This study describes an adoptable, longitudinally comprehensive and multidisciplinary recovery pathway for autologous reconstruction which adds to the current guidelines. The authors aimed to allow perioperative outcomes comparable to alloplastic reconstructions. METHODS: All autologous Comprehensive Recovery Pathway (CRP) subjects from a single surgeon were retrospectively included. A comparator group of equal size was randomly selected from institutional subpectoral and dual-plane tissue expander patients having Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline-directed care. All subjects in both cohorts received preoperative paravertebral regional blocks. Operative detail, inpatient recovery, longitudinal morphine equivalents (MEs) required, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Each cohort included 71 cases (99 breasts). Despite longer operations, intraoperative MEs were fewer in autologous cases ( P = 0.02). Morphine equivalents during inpatient stay were similar between cohorts, with both being discharged on median day 2. Multivariate regression demonstrated a 0.8-day increased stay for autologous subjects with additional contribution from bilateral cases, body mass index, and age ( P < 0.05). Autologous subjects were regularly discharged postoperative day 1 (17%) and postoperative day 2 (39%), with trend toward earlier discharge ( P < 0.01). Outpatient MEs were significantly fewer in autologous subjects, corresponding to a 30- to 150-mg oxycodone difference ( P < 0.01). Major complication occurred in 12.7% of autologous and 22.5% of alloplastic subjects ( P = 0.11). Flap loss occurred in 1 autologous subject versus 11 alloplastic failures ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study details partnership between the plastic surgery service, regional and acute pain anesthesia services, and dedicated nursing with longitudinal optimizations allowing perioperative outcomes improved over current literature. Patients in the CRP used fewer opioids from operation through follow-up with comparable length of stay and significantly fewer reconstructive failures than alloplastic subjects. The pathway may be quickly adopted into academic practice patterns and mitigates traditional barriers, allowing extension of autologous reconstruction offerings.

Impact of Tissue Expander Surface Texture on Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: A Combined Analysis of Incidence, Timing, and Severity.

BACKGROUND: With ongoing investigations of the impact of device texturing on breast implant-related anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), studies have begun comparing complications profiles of tissue expanders. However, there is a paucity of timing and severity data of complications. The aim of this study is to provide a comparative survival analysis of post-operative complications between smooth (STE) and textured tissue expanders (TTE) in breast reconstruction. METHODS: A single institution experience with tissue expander breast reconstruction was reviewed for complications up to 1 year post 2nd stage reconstruction from 2014-2020. Demographics, comorbidities, operation-related variables, and complications were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier curves, cox proportional hazard models, and a consensus based ordinal logistic regression model were used to compare complication profiles. RESULTS: Of 919 ttal patients, 65.3% (n=600) received TTEs and 34.7% (n=319) received STEs. There was increased risk of infection (p<0.0001), seroma (p=0.046), expander malposition (p<0.0001), and wound dehiscence (p=0.019) in STEs compared to TTEs. However, there were also decreased risk of capsular contracture (p=0.005) in STEs compared to TTEs. Failure of breast reconstruction (p<0.001) and wound dehiscence (p=0.018) occurred significantly earlier in STEs compared to TTEs. Predictors for significantly higher severity complications included: smooth tissue expander use (p=0.007), shorter time to complication (p<0.0001), higher BMI (p=0.005), smoking history (p=0.025), and nipple sparing mastectomy (p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the timing and severity of complications contribute to the safety profiles of tissue expanders. STEs are associated increased odds of higher severity and earlier complications. Therefore, tissue expander selection may depend on underlying risk factors and severity predictors.

An Enhanced Audiologic Protocol for Early Identification of Conductive Hearing Loss in Patients with Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the onset and prevalence of conductive hearing loss (CHL) in pediatric patients with cleft palate (CP) prior to palatoplasty with an enhanced audiologic protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients with CP who received audiologic workup pre-operatively. Patients with bilateral permanent hearing loss, expiration prior to palatoplasty, or no pre-operative data were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with CP born February 2019 to November 2019 who passed newborn hearing screening (NBHS) received audiologic testing at 9 months of age (standard protocol). Patients born December 2019 to September 2020 underwent testing prior to 9 months of age (enhanced protocol). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age of identification of CHL in patients after implementation of the enhanced audiologic protocol. RESULTS: The number of patients who passed their NBHS in the standard protocol (n = 14, 54%) and the enhanced protocol (n = 25, 66%) did not differ. Infants who passed their NBHS, but demonstrated hearing loss on subsequent audiologic testing did not differ between enhanced (n = 25, 66%) and standard cohort (n = 14, 54%). Of patients who passed NBHS in the enhanced protocol, 48% (n = 12) had CHL identified by 3 months, and 20% (n = 5) by 6 months of age. With the enhanced protocol, patients who did not undergo additional testing post NBHS significantly dropped from 44.9% (n = 22) to 4.2% (n = 2) (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Even with passed NBHS, CHL is still present for infants with CP pre-operatively. Earlier and more frequent testing for this population is recommended.

Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction.

Background and Objective: After a relatively late introduction to the literature in 2015, enhanced recovery protocols for breast reconstruction have flourished into a wealth of reports. Many have since described unique methodologies making improved offerings with superior outcomes attainable. This is a particularly interesting procedure for the study of enhanced recovery as it encompasses two dissident approaches. Compared to implant-based reconstruction, autologous free-flap reconstruction has demonstrated superiority in a range of long-term metrics at the expense of historically increased peri-operative morbidity. This narrative review collates reports of recovery protocols for both approaches and examines methodologies surrounding the key pieces of a comprehensive pathway. Methods: All primary clinical reports specifically describing enhanced recovery protocols for implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction through 2022 were identified by systematic review of PubMed and Embase libraries. Twenty-five reports meeting criteria were identified, with ten additional reports included for narrative purpose. Included studies were examined for facets of innovation from the pre-hospital setting through outpatient follow-up. Notable findings were described in the context of a comprehensive framework with attention paid to clinical and basic scientific background. Considerations for implementation were additionally discussed. Key Content and Findings: Of 35 included studies, 29 regarded autologous reconstruction with majority focus on reduction of peri-operative opioid requirements and length of stay. Six regarded implant-based reconstruction with most discussing pathways towards ambulatory procedures. Eighty percent of included studies were published after the 2017 consensus guidelines with many described innovations to this baseline. Pathways included considerations for pre-hospital, pre-operative, intra-operative, inpatient, and outpatient settings. Implant-based studies demonstrated that safe ambulatory care is accessible. Autologous studies demonstrated a trend towards discharge before post-operative day three and peri-operative opioid requirements equivalent to those of implant-based reconstructions. Conclusions: Study of enhanced recovery after breast reconstruction has inspired paradigm shift and pushed limits previously not thought to be attainable. These protocols should encompass a longitudinal care pathway with optimization through patient-centered approaches and multidisciplinary collaboration. This framework should represent standard of care and will serve to expand availability of all methods of breast reconstruction.

Free Tissue Transfer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Proposed Evidence-Based Protocol for Early Discharge.

BACKGROUND: As free tissue transfer outcomes improve, institutions are examining early discharge protocols. "Early" is generally defined as between one and five days postoperatively, which correlates with the timing of most major complications and most opportunities for flap salvage. Given the trend towards early discharge, the need for healthcare cost reductions and shortage of ICU beds during a viral pandemic, we aimed to propose an evidence-based protocol to select patients for discharge within 72 h of free tissue transfer. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent free tissue transfer at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee, USA since the onset of the COVID-19 (2020-2021) pandemic was performed. Patients were included for review if they were discharged within 72 h of surgery. Literature relating to expedited discharge after free tissue transfer was also reviewed. RESULTS: Six patients met inclusion criteria for retrospective review. None suffered intraoperative or postoperative inpatient complications and all were discharged within 72 h postoperatively. There were no flap failures within 30 d of reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This study reviews a patient cohort undergoing free tissue transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic. These cases were reviewed for factors that may have contributed to their postoperative success after discharge within 72 hours. These data points were combined with published evidence on risks for failure after free flap reconstruction to design a protocol to select patients for early discharge. The benefits of early discharge include reducing healthcare costs, risks of inpatient hospitalization, and ICU utilization, which is of paramount importance in the midst of a global pandemic..