Ceramic conversion treated titanium implant abutments with gold for enhanced antimicrobial activity.

INTRODUCTION: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory process around dental implants that is characterised by bone loss that may jeopardize the long-term survival of osseo integrated dental implants. The aim of this study was to create a surface coating on titanium abutments that possesses cellular adhesion and anti-microbial properties as a post-implant placement strategy for patients at risk of peri-implantitis. MATERIALS AND METHODSMETHODS: Titanium alloy Grade V stubs were coated with gold particles and then subjected to ceramic conversion treatment (CCT) at 620 °C for 3, 8 and 80 h. The surface characteristics and chemistry were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The leaching profile was investigated by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) for all groups after 7, 14 and 28 days in contact with distilled water. A scratch test was conducted to assess the adhesion of the gold coating to the underlying titanium discs. Two bacterial species (Staphylococcus aureus (SA) & Fusobacterium nucleatum (FN)) were used to assess the antibacterial behaviour of the coated discs using a direct attachment assay test. The potential changes in surface chemistry by the bacterial species were investigated by grazing angle XRD. RESULTS: The gold pre-coated titanium discs exhibited good stability of the coating especially after immersion in distilled water and after bacterial colonisation as evident by XRD analysis. Good surface adhesion of the coating was demonstrated for gold treated discs after scratch test analysis, especially titanium, following a 3-hour (3 H) ceramic conversion treatment. All coated discs exhibited significantly improved antimicrobial properties against both tested bacterial species compared to untreated titanium discs. CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic conversion treated titanium with a pre-deposited gold layer showed improved antimicrobial properties against both SA and FN species than untreated Ti-C discs. Scratch test analysis showed good adherence properties of the coated discs the oxide layer formed is firmly adherent to the underlying titanium substrate, suggesting that this approach may have clinical efficacy for coating implant abutments.

Effect of mouth rinses on the stainability of monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics with different surface treatments: An in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Mouth rinses have been reported to cause tooth surface discoloration. However, information regarding their effect on the stainability of monolithic glass-ceramics with different surface treatments is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of mouth rinses on the color change of milled and pressed monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics with different surface treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six Ø12×1.5-mm disk specimens were fabricated using 2 different processing techniques: milling and pressing. Each group was subdivided into 2 subgroups according to surface treatments: glazed and polished. Specimens were then immersed in 2 different types of mouth rinse (n=7): chlorhexidine (CHX) and Listerine (LST). Color parameters were assessed using a digital spectrophotometer. Color difference (ΔE00) was calculated and compared with perceptibility (ΔE00=0.8) and acceptability (ΔE00=1.8) thresholds. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests (α=.05). RESULTS: The color difference (ΔE00) was significantly affected by the type of processing technique, surface treatment, and mouth rinse (P<.001) and their interaction (P=.008). All ΔE00 values were below the selected clinical acceptability threshold (ΔE00=1.8). Milled groups (ΔE00=1.13) showed greater discoloration than pressed groups (ΔE00=0.86). Glazed specimens (ΔE00=0.70) were more resistant to discoloration than polished specimens (ΔE00=1.28) and immersion in CHX (ΔE00=1.09) led to more discoloration than immersion in LST (ΔE00=0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The color of milled and pressed monolithic lithium disilicate glass-ceramics with different surface treatments was affected by using CHX and LST mouth rinses. Glazed lithium disilicate glass-ceramics showed less staining compared with those that were polished. Specimens immersed in CHX showed more discoloration than those immersed in LST.

Effect of different interfacial surface treatments on the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic and zirconia core.

BACKGROUND: Several interfacial surface treatments of zirconia surfaces have been proposed to improve adhesion to ceramic veneering. However, information regarding the durability and effect of such treatments on the bond strength following such treatments is lacking. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength between veneering ceramic and zirconia core after different interfacial surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two discs (8 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) were fabricated from zirconia blanks using a microtome cutting machine. Zirconia discs were divided into four groups (n = 13). Group I was subjected to air-borne abrasion using (Al2O3), group II was coated by bioglass, group III was coated with ZirLiner, and group IV was subjected to wash firing (sprinkle technique). A cylinder (4 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of veneering ceramic was fired on top of the zirconia core. Shear bond strength (SBS) between zirconia core and veneering ceramic was evaluated by using a universal testing machine. The data was collected and statistically analysed using One-Way ANOVA followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni adjusted significance level. The failure modes were assessed using a stereomicroscope for each group. RESULTS: The highest mean bond strength was recorded in group III (17.98 ± 2.51 MPa), followed by group II (15.10 ± 4.53 MPa), then group I 14.65 ± 2.97 MPa. The lowest mean bond strength was recorded in group IV (13.28 ± 3.55 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: Surface treatments had an effect on the zirconia-veneer shear bond strength. Liner coating revealed the highest shear bond strength values, significantly higher in comparison to wash firing (sprinkle technique) .

Effect of pattern materials and fabrication techniques on the color of a pressed lithium disilicate ceramic: An in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Pattern materials and their fabrication techniques have been reported to affect the marginal accuracy and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate ceramic restorations. However, information regarding their effect on the color of such restorations is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color of a pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic fabricated from wax or resin patterns by using conventional and milling techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six Ø14×1.5-mm disk pattern specimens were divided into 4 groups based on the pattern material and fabrication technique: conventional wax pattern group (CW), conventional resin pattern group (CR), milled wax pattern group (MW), and milled resin pattern group (MR). Lithium disilicate specimens were fabricated by using the lost wax technique. The CIELab values were measured with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Advance). The ΔE00 values were calculated and compared with perceptibility (ΔE00=0.8) and acceptability (ΔE00=1.8) thresholds to interpret the color differences. The 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used to analyze data (α=.05). RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed that ΔE00 was significantly affected by the pattern material (P<.001), fabrication technique (P=.034), and their interaction (P<.001). The ΔE00 of the CW group (0.76 ±0.04) was clinically imperceptible. No significant difference in the ΔE00 values was found between the reference and the MW (1.48 ±0.13) and MR (1.51 ±0.15) groups (P=.926), which were both clinically perceptible and acceptable. The highest ΔE00 was that of the CR group (2.06 ±0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The color of the pressed lithium disilicate ceramic was influenced by the wax and resin pattern materials fabricated by using conventional or computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques. Only the CW pattern group showed color differences below the clinically perceptible threshold (ΔE00=0.8). The CR pattern group showed the highest color differences, which were not clinically acceptable.

Effect of yellow anodization of titanium on the shade of lithium disilicate ceramic with different thicknesses.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The color of the titanium abutment can affect the shade of the definitive restoration. Methods such as anodic oxidation, which changes the gray color of implant abutment to yellow, have been advocated to mask the unesthetic gray color of the abutment. However, whether a yellow anodized titanium abutment can prevent discoloration of translucent ceramic restorations is uncertain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the yellow anodization of titanium on the shade of lithium disilicate ceramic with different thicknesses by using CIEDE 2000 formulas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty grade V titanium backgrounds were fabricated and divided into 2 test groups (n=30): group A was anodized to a yellow color, and group U was unanodized. Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroups (n=10) according to the thickness of the lithium disilicate ceramic cemented over it: subgroup 1 with 1-mm-thick lithium disilicate, subgroup 1.5 with 1.5-mm-thick lithium disilicate, and subgroup 2 with 2-mm-thick lithium disilicate. Each titanium background was cemented to its corresponding lithium disilicate block by using translucent resin cement. For the control group, 5-mm-thick lithium disilicate specimens were fabricated. Color measurements of the specimens were made with a spectrophotometer, and differences were calculated by using CIEDE 2000 formulas (ΔE00). Comparisons between the 2 study groups were done by using independent samples t test. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess the effect of anodization and thickness on ΔE00 with calculation of adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals (α=.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found among the mean values between yellow anodized and unanodized groups in all ceramic thicknesses (P<.001 for 1 mm, P<.001 for 1.5 mm, and P<.046 for 2 mm). Yellow anodization of titanium and increasing the ceramic thickness from 1 to 2 mm decreased the ΔE00 values. CONCLUSIONS: The restoration shade appeared to be improved by titanium anodization to a yellow color and by increasing the thickness of the machinable high-translucent lithium disilicate.