ABSTRACT
Objectives Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies that are associated with and ordered to diagnose autoimmune connective tissue disease. ANA have high sensitivity (~98%) but low specificity (~75%), and because they can be found in healthy individuals and non-rheumatologic conditions leading to their elevation, ANA tests are often requested and interpreted inappropriately by clinicians. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess how frequently ANA testing is repeated in the adult population of Saudi Arabia (SA) and which factors are associated with and lead to inappropriate testing. Methodology We investigated a study group of 40,634 adult patients who underwent 229,825 ANA tests from 2018 to 2022 in an academic hospital in Jeddah, SA. We took a random sample of 500 patients from the study group, along with their 998 ANA tests, to look in depth into our research questions. Variables related to patients, ANA tests, and ordering physicians were collected. Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed to address the research questions, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We found 57% of the ordered ANA tests to have positive results, with the most common titers of mild positivity being 1:80 and 1:160. Most repeated ANA tests were ordered with an interval of more than one year, and when repeated, 67% of test results remained unchanged. The majority of seroconversions resulted from negative ANA tests or those with weak (titer 1:40) or mild positivity (titer 1:80-1:160). The results of the moderate (titer 1:320-1:640) and strong (titer ≥1280) positivity ANA tests did not change. Only 11% of repeated ANA tests were found to be appropriate for repetition. The most common specialties associated with ordering ANA tests in general were internal medicine, followed by rheumatology, and finally family medicine. Our correlation analysis revealed that being female, having systemic connective tissue disease, and having a rheumatologist as a specialist were all associated with ordering more than 10 ANA tests (p < 0.05). Conclusion Because the results of repeated ANA tests did not change much, our study suggests that the cost of repeating ANA tests and the subsequent potentially unnecessary interventions should all be carefully examined before scheduling a repeated ANA test. Further studies involving patients from SA and across wider healthcare settings (academic, community, and private hospitals and healthcare centers) are warranted.
ABSTRACT
Objectives Nephrolithiasis is a common disease, and Saudi Arabia is among the countries with the highest prevalence of nephrolithiasis. Obesity is one of the risk factors associated with the increased formation of renal calculi. We aimed to assess whether obesity also increases the recurrence rate of nephrolithiasis. Methods We retrospectively identified and collected data of 283 adult patients with renal stones who were managed at our hospital from November 2018 to November 2021. The demographic information, comorbidities, stone burden, and treatment methods related to them were identified, collected, and analyzed. Moreover, we performed the chi-squared test (χ2) and multivariate logistic regression analysis in order to assess the risk factors (i.e., independent predictors) of recurrence among the studied patients. Additionally, the odds ratio (OR) was calculated at a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Of the 283 adult patients we analyzed, 35 did not meet the criteria of our study and, consequently, were excluded. Therefore, we ended up with 248 patients, of whom 179 (68.1%) were males, 131 (52.8%) had a previous history of renal stones, and 90 (36.3%) had chronic illnesses. Moreover, the mean age of the studied patients was 48.91 ± 14.51 years, and the mean BMI was 29.44 ± 6.1 kg/m2. It was found that most of the patients (35.5%) had only one stone, while 23.4% of them had more than 5 stones. Furthermore, the majority of the stones (35.9%) were medium size (with a stone diameter of 10-19 mm [1-1.9 cm]). We did not find a relationship between obesity and the recurrence rate of renal stones. However, there was a significant association (p < 0.05) between the recurrence rate and Saudi nationality, chronic diseases (more specifically, HTN), unilateral stones, and a stone diameter of 10-19 mm (1-1.9 cm). Additionally, we identified diabetes and the kidney as stone location factors that are associated with less recurrence. Conclusion Although obesity was reported to increase the risk of renal stone formation, we did not find it to be associated with an increased recurrent rate of the disease in the Saudi Arabian population, which is inconsistent with other studies conducted in this area in other countries. Therefore, larger studies are needed to prove this finding.
