The effect of metformin on insulin resistance and exercise parameters in patients with heart failure.

AIMS: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is an insulin-resistant state. The degree of insulin resistance (IR) correlates with disease severity and is associated with reduced exercise capacity. In this proof of concept study, we have examined the effect of metformin on IR and exercise capacity in non-diabetic CHF patients identified to have IR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 62 non-diabetic IR CHF patients (mean age, 65.2 ± 8.0 years; male, 90%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 32.6 ± 8.3%; New York Heart Association class I/II/III/IV, 11/45/6/0) were randomized to receive either 4 months of metformin (n = 39, 2 g/day) or matching placebo (n = 23). IR was defined by a fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI) ≥2.7. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and FIRI were assessed at baseline and after 4 months of intervention. Compared with placebo, metformin decreased FIRI (from 5.8 ± 3.8 to 4.0 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and resulted in a weight loss of 1.9 kg (P < 0.001). The primary endpoint of the study, peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)), did not differ between treatment groups. However, metformin improved the secondary endpoint of the slope of the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO(2) slope), from 32.9 ± 15.9 to 28.1 ± 8.8 (P = 0.034). In the metformin-treated group, FIRI was significantly related to the reduction of the VE/VCO(2) slope (R = 0.41, P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Metformin treatment significantly improved IR but had no effect on peak VO(2), the primary endpoint of our study. However, metformin treatment did result in a significant improvement in VE/VCO(2) slope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00473876.

Effect of Metformin on mortality in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) plus chronic heart failure (CHF) is a common but lethal combination and therapeutic options are limited. Metformin is perceived as being relatively contraindicated in this context, although mounting evidence indicates that it may be beneficial. This study was carried out to investigate the use of metformin therapy for treating patients with DM and CHF in a large population-based cohort study. The Health Informatics Centre-dispensed prescribing database for the population of Tayside, Scotland (population ∼400,000) was linked to the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) information system. Patients with DM and incident CHF from 1994 to 2003 receiving oral hypoglycemic agents but not insulin were identified. Cox regression was used to assess differences in all-cause mortality rates between patients prescribed metformin and patients prescribed sulfonylureas with adjustment for co-morbidities and other therapies. Four hundred twenty-two study subjects (mean ± SD 75.4 ± 0.5 years of age, 46.2% women) were identified: metformin monotherapy (n = 68, mean age 75.5 ± 1.1 years, 48.5% women), sulfonylurea monotherapy (n = 217, mean age 76.7 ± 0.7 years, 45.2% women), and combination (n = 137, mean age, 73.4 ± 0.7 years, 46.7% women). Fewer deaths occurred in metformin users, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, compared to the sulfonylurea monotherapy cohort at 1 year (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.96) and over long-term follow up (0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.88). In conclusion, this large observational data suggest that metformin may be beneficial in patients with CHF and DM. These findings need to be verified by a prospective clinical trial.

Insulin resistance is highly prevalent and is associated with reduced exercise tolerance in nondiabetic patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of insulin resistance (IR) among nondiabetic chronic heart failure (CHF) patients and to seek factors associated with IR in CHF, including the relationship of IR to functional class, exercise capacity, and disease severity in CHF. BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence suggest that CHF is an IR state. The prevalence of IR in CHF and its relation to CHF have not been fully defined. METHODS: Fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI) was assessed in a cohort of 129 consecutive CHF patients (mean age 69.2 +/- 10.4 years; 76% males; body mass index 27.4 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2)). Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and peripheral endothelial function testing by reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT). RESULTS: Prevalence of IR as defined by FIRI > or =2.7 was 61% in our cohort of CHF patients. There was a significant correlation between IR and waist circumference (r = 0.37; p < 0.01), serum triglycerides (r = 0.34; p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = -0.22; p = 0.02), and serum leptin (r = 0.39; p = 0.03). Insulin resistance increased significantly with worsening New York Heart Association functional class (p < 0.01). The CHF patients with IR had a significantly lower exercise capacity and peak oxygen consumption than patients with an FIRI <2.7. The RH-PAT ratio was significantly lower in CHF patients with IR compared with CHF patients with an FIRI <2.7 (1.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.5; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insulin resistance is highly prevalent among nondiabetic CHF patients and is associated with decreased exercise capacity in patients with CHF. (Insulin Resistance: Heart Failure; NCT00486967).

Insulin resistance: a potential new target for therapy in patients with heart failure.

There is increasing evidence to suggest that chronic heart failure (CHF) is an insulin resistant (IR) state and that the degree of IR correlates with the severity and mortality of CHF. The pathophysiology of IR in CHF has yet to be fully defined. Additionally, it remains to be determined if IR is merely a marker reflecting the severity of CHF or whether it contributes to the disease in CHF. If IR is truly a culprit that worsens CHF, it will potentially be a new target for therapy as strategies that can reverse IR in CHF may potentially result in an improvement in symptoms and even mortality in these patients. However, there are concerns regarding the use of certain insulin sensitizers, most notably, the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) which have been associated with increased risk of hospitalizations for CHF. Despite previous concerns of lactic acidosis (LA), there is now evidence that metformin may not only be safe but could potentially be useful in the setting of CHF. There are now ongoing prospective studies, including the TAYSIDE study, to determine if reversing IR with metformin will have beneficial effects in patients with CHF.