Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 652857, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34055690

ABSTRACT

Background: Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is under investigation. A few reports suggest the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from mothers to their neonates. Most neonates have mild symptoms, but some develop multisystem involvement and shock. Case Presentation: We report two cases of possible SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission from mothers to their neonates. The first case shows maternal infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the second trimester followed by recurrent infection in the third trimester right before the delivery. The infant demonstrated respiratory distress soon after delivery along with myocardial dysfunction and multi-organ system involvement. The second case shows maternal infection with SARS-COV-2 at the time of delivery with preterm labor secondary to placental abruption, with that delivery resulting in the preterm neonate requiring non-invasive ventilation with multisystem involvement in the context of persistently positive SARS-COV-2 PCR in the neonate. Both neonates were treated with IVIG along with steroids. Both neonates recovered fully and were discharged and allowed to go home. Conclusion: In neonates, COVID-19 usually presents as an asymptomatic or mild illness; some may develop a more severe course. Our two cases, however, demonstrate that multisystem involvement, although rare, is possible. This report also supports the current evidence of possible vertical transmission from mothers to their neonates. This multisystem involvement might be underreported and should be considered in neonates with respiratory distress when born to mothers suffering of COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration: [KSUMC], identifier [No#98763298].

2.
Saudi Med J ; 41(11): 1197-1203, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33130839

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic has had any effects on pediatric vaccination rates at the main university hospital in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia using electronic health records. The vaccination statuses of all children who were scheduled for vaccinations at birth and at 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months during March, April and May between 2017 and 2020 were included in the study with total sample of 15,870 children, and comparisons between the cohorts were performed. RESULTS: All vaccination visits during April and May 2020 were below the lower extremes except for the birth vaccinations. In March, April, and May 2020 there were respective drops in vaccination visits of 49.93%, 71.90% and 68.48% compared with the mean numbers of vaccination visits during the same months from 2017 to 2019. In comparisons of mean numbers of visits from March 2017 to May 2019 and March to May in 2020, the respective reductions in visits for birth and 2, 4, 6, 9 and 12-month vaccinations were 16.5%, 80.5%, 74.7%, 72.9%, 80.0% and 74.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The huge impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on childhood vaccinations will require urgent vaccination recovery plans with innovative approaches and future action plans to maintain vaccination coverage during any subsequent pandemics.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , COVID-19 , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Immunization/methods , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Sex Factors
3.
Saudi Med J ; 40(12): 1242-1250, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31828276

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and its determinants among Saudi parents. In addition, we explored the relationship between vaccine hesitancy and child's immunization status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using interviews with parents visiting outpatient clinics at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, between July 2017 and October 2018. The strategic advisory group of experts on immunization vaccine hesitancy survey was used. Results: A total of 500 parents were interviewed. Twenty percent of parents were hesitant to get their child vaccinated. Parents with higher educational levels were more vaccine hesitant (p less than 0.001). Among parents who reported hesitancy toward vaccination, 36% of children were not vaccinated fully for their age. Concerns related to vaccine safety were the most frequent reason (53%) reported by vaccine-hesitant parents. Negative beliefs toward vaccination seemed to be associated with increase hesitancy and incomplete vaccination status of children. In multivariate analyses, the main factors associated with both parents' hesitancy and incomplete vaccination status were believing that vaccines are ineffective (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-102.3) and believing that vaccines are not important (AOR=27, 95% CI: 5.8-126). Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy among parents in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a concern and is likely to influence the vaccination status of their children. Countering vaccine related concerns must be tailored, particularly in higher-educated groups.


Subject(s)
Parents/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Saudi Arabia
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 87(4): 320-324, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28104327

ABSTRACT

Since discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), a novel betacoronavirus first isolated and characterized in 2012, MERS-CoV real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assays represent one of the most rapidly expanding commercial tests. However, in the absence of extensive evaluations of these assays on positive clinical material of different sources, evaluating their diagnostic effectiveness remains challenging. We describe the diagnostic performance evaluation of 3 common commercial MERS-CoV rRT-PCR assays on a large panel (n = 234) of upper respiratory tract specimens collected during an outbreak episode in Saudi Arabia. Assays were compared to the RealStar® MERS-CoV RT-PCR (Alton Diagnostics, Hamburg, Germany) assay as the gold standard. Results showed i) the TIB MolBiol® LightMix UpE and Orf1a assays (TIB MolBiol, Berlin, Germany) to be the most sensitive, followed by ii) the Anyplex™ Seegene MERS-CoV assay (Seegene, Seoul, Korea), and finally iii) the PrimerDesign™ Genesig® HCoV_2012 assay (PrimerDesign, England, United Kingdom). We also evaluate a modified protocol for the PrimerDesign™ Genesig® HCoV_2012 assay.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/microbiology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Respiratory System/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Disease Outbreaks , England , Germany , Humans , Republic of Korea , Saudi Arabia
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(3): 277-82, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24581016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella species cause worldwide problems in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This study aimed to determine possible risk factors for infection or colonization with ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBLKp) during an outbreak in the NICU. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among neonates admitted to the NICU of a teaching hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during an outbreak of ESBLKp from April to July 2008. The incidence density ratio was calculated to determine possible predictors of ESBLKp colonization or infection. RESULTS: During 2,265 person-days of follow-up of 118 neonates, 4 became infected, and 8 were colonized with ESBLKp. Univariate analyzes revealed that, among 14 neonates who were treated with vancomycin, 9 (64.3%) developed infection or colonization with ESBLKp, whereas, among 104 neonates who were not treated with vancomycin, 3 (2.9%) were affected, with an incidence density ratio of 4.22 (95% confidence interval: 1.47-5.15). Parenteral feeding and mechanical ventilation were found to be marginally significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: Treatment with vancomycin appears to be a risk factor for infection or colonization with ESBLKp in the NICU setting.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...