Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Haematol ; 106(3): 737-43, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468867

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the presence of monoclonal myeloma precursor B cells in peripheral blood stem cell harvests and to investigate their role in the clinical outcome of multiple myeloma patients. A total of 39 multiple myeloma patients were treated with a sequential therapy including double high-dose melphalan therapy followed by a double transplant procedure. The apheresis products for the second transplant were purged using a panel of four or five different mouse monoclonal antibodies against B-cell antigens (CD10, CD19, CD20, CD22 and CD37). In 19/39 patients a tumour-specific CDR III signal was identified in the diagnostic bone marrow. Gene scan analysis after CDR III PCR of the magnetic bead isolated B-cell fraction from the apheresis products in these 19 patients revealed three different patterns: 32% of patients had a predominantly monoclonal B-cell population; 63% of patients had an identifiable monoclonal signal within an oligoclonal B-cell population. In only 1/19 patients were no monoclonal B cells identified in the B-cell population of the apheresis product. A correlation between the clonal pattern and the clinical response after sequential chemotherapy was found. Patients with a predominance of monoclonal myeloma or myeloma precursor B cells had an early relapse or achieved a minimal response or a partial remission. Patients with an oligo- and/or polyclonal pattern achieved a high percentage of partial as well as complete remissions.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/pathology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Male , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Plasma Cells/pathology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Haematologica ; 84(9): 844-52, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10477460

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Autologous transplantation is a better treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) than chemotherapy, but uncertainty remains about patient selection, optimal timing of autograft, conditioning regimen, need for a second autograft, and role of maintenance. To provide partial answers to these questions we assessed the results of autologous transplantation in a large cohort of patients whose data were reported to the GITMO registry. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 290 patients with MM (M = 150; F = 140; median age 52 years, range 19-70; stage I = 34, stage II = 75, stage III = 167) reported to the GITMO. At the time of autograft, 20% were in CR, 66% in PR, while the remaining had non-responsive or progressive disease. Median time between diagnosis and transplant was 16 months (1-90). Seventy-two patients (26%) had been planned to receive a double autograft, but this was actually done in only 35 (12%). The conditioning was chemotherapy in 90%. Peripheral blood was the only source of stem cells in 94%, and purging was applied in 10% of cases. For statistical analysis of data, differences between patient subsets were analyzed using the chi-square test, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate event-free survival (EFS) and survival (OS) probabilities. The Cox model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Following the autograft, 116 patients (40%) were in CR, 144 (50%) in PR, 24 (8%) did not respond or progressed and 6 (2%) died before response evaluation. Transplant-related mortality occurred in 3%. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 223 (77%) patients are alive, 71 (24%) of them in CR, and 67 (23%) patients have died at a median time of 20 months (0-70). OS and EFS at 6 years are 47% and 28%, respectively, but the EFS curve shows no plateau. In multivariate analysis, age, beta2-microglobulin level and status at transplant emerged as significant prognostic factors for both OS and EFS, while time from diagnosis to transplant showed borderline significance. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on the prognostic factors identified in multivariate analysis, we were able to assess the weight of a single prognostic factor or their combinations on transplant outcome. We also calculated the probability of OS and EFS by the number of factors at the time of autograft. Autologous transplantation is a safe and effective procedure, not only in sensitive patients, but also in resistant cases, provided they are <55 years of age and have low beta2-microglobulin. It should be applied early after the diagnosis of multiple myeloma, following the delivery of brief primary chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Transplantation, Autologous/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Italy/epidemiology , Life Tables , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, Autologous/mortality , Treatment Outcome , beta 2-Microglobulin/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...