Use of a preventive sling surgery for the simultaneous correction of latent stress urinary incontinence during the cystocele repair: two year follow-up.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to assess the feasibility and utility of adding a preventive trans obturatory tape (TOT) during the same intervention for anterior prolapse repair, in patients with masked urinary incontinence and massive cystocele. METHODS: A retrospective trial was conducted in a Tertiary care University Hospital. Ninety-nine women with a massive cystocele (Ba ≥2 cm of pelvic organ prolapse quantification) and an occult stress urinary incontinence were recruited from 2004 to 2010: 53 women were subjected to an anterior fascial reconstruction alone while 46 underwent the same intervention with the addition of TOT. Patients were also asked to rate their overall quality of life, using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality Of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol). All patients were assessed at one, six, twelve and twenty-four months of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 15.0 software; SPSS inc., Chicago IL, USA was performed using the Chi-square test with Fisher's post-hoc correction. RESULTS: At 24 month follow-up the rate of appearance of stress urinary incontinence at the urogynecological examination, was higher in the group without TOT (81% vs. 19%, P=0.004). In terms of overall quality of life, significantly higher rates of satisfaction have been reported by the group treated with additional TOT (P=0.006). CONCLUSION: The addition of TOT during the anterior prolapse correction seems to give a greater durability to the correction, resulting, in the long term, in a lower rate of urinary symptoms onset (first latency) and in a better quality of life compared to the traditional anterior colporrhaphy alone.

Superiority of laparoscopy compared to ultrasonography in diagnosis of widespread liver diseases.

The aim of the study was to compare the results of ultrasonography (US) and laparoscopy in a series of 210 patients referred to our institution for the diagnosis of widespread liver diseases. Among 205 patients, laparoscopy revealed cirrhosis in 114, chronic widespread disease in 70 (chronic persistent hepatitis in 21, chronic active hepatitis in 28, steatosis in 14, acute hepatitis in 5, fibrosis in 2), and absence of liver disease in 21. Four of these cases had minor complications. A corroborative diagnosis was obtained in 122 patients (59.5%). Overall sensitivity of US was 84% with a low specificity due to the high rate of false negatives. From the results of this study we conclude that laparoscopy is a safe and essential diagnostic tool in the final diagnosis of widespread liver diseases and that US is not a reliable screening method because of its incidence of false negatives.

[Intravenous omeprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of hemorrhagic duodenal ulcer: a prospective randomized study]. / Oméprazole versus ranitidine intraveineux dans le traitement de l'ulcére duodénal hémorragique: une étude randomisée prospective.

This prospective randomized trial compares the results of i.v. omeprazole and i.v. ranitidine in 45 patients admitted as an emergency with an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding duodenal ulcer. The patients were randomized to receive i.v. omeprazole, 40 mg bolus followed by 80 mg/day by continuous infusion for 3 days (group A), or ranitidine 50 mg i.v. bolus followed by 400 mg/day i.v., continuous infusion for 3 days (group B). Follow-up endoscopy on day 4 demonstrated successful therapy, except when more than 4 units of blood/day had to be transfused to maintain hemoglobin level above 10 g/l. Bleeding stopped in 20/21 patients in group A (95.2%), and in 17/24 patients in group B (70.80%) (p < 0.05). From the results of the study, it can be concluded that intravenous omeprazole seems to be effective in the control of bleeding duodenal ulcer.

[Biliary scintigraphy vs. ultrasonography in the etiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis]. / Biliscintigraphie contre échographie dans le diagnostic étiologique de la pancréatite aiguë.

Etiology of acute pancreatitis has important implications in the treatment of the disease as gallstones pancreatitis requires the correction of the underlying biliary disease. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the detection of stones in emergency has been questioned, and HIDA biliscintigraphy has been reported to be a possible indicator of biliary pancreatitis. This study compares the value of HIDA colesscintigraphy and ultrasonography in the etiologic diagnosis of 35 patients admitted and treated for acute pancreatitis in our Institution. All patients underwent ERCP for the confirmation of the findings. Cholescintigraphy showed no visualisation of the gallbladder, suggesting biliary tract stones, in 25 patients. In all of them ERCP confirmed the presence of gallbladder and/or common bile duct stones, and endoscopic sphincterotomy and later elective cholescystectomy was performed. Ultrasonography failed to demonstrate biliary stones in 11 of those patients. HIDA cholescintigraphy showed a sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 1 vs 0.56 and 0.45 for ultrasonography. From the results of our study it can be concluded that HIDA biliscintigraphy is more reliable than ultrasonography in the discrimination of biliary vs non-biliary acute pancreatitis in emergency.