Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 30(12): 867-70, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25407036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporal artery (TA) thermometry has come as one of the new methods for temperature measurement, especially in children in whom accurate temperature monitoring can save lives. The device which is convenient and simple to use is yet to gain popularity in several parts of the world, as there are conflicting reports of its accuracy. This study compares the accuracy of the TA thermometry in children younger than 5 years using the rectal thermometry as the gold standard. METHODS: Temperature was measured simultaneously in eligible children younger than 5 years from the forehead and rectum using the TA thermometer (TAT-2000C Exergen, USA) and standard mercury in glass rectal thermometer, respectively. The difference between the mean temperatures obtained by the 2 thermometry methods was tested using the paired t test. Pearson correlation coefficient, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot were also used to test the relationship and agreement between the 2 instruments. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. RESULTS: Overall, the mean TA temperature (37.80°C ± 1.07°C) was significantly lower than the mean rectal temperature (38.07°C ± 0.95°C), P < 0.001. In neonates, however, the mean difference was not significant, 0.02 ± 0.59 (P = 0.810). There was a significant positive correlation between the rectal and the temporal temperatures (r = 0.80, P < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plot showed wide variation in the limit of agreement between the rectal and the TA temperatures which ranged from -1.02°C to +1.56°C. The sensitivity of the TA thermometer was 64.6% and 83.5%, respectively, at a TA fever cutoff of 38.0°C and 37.7°C. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal artery thermometer is not accurate enough for the measurement of core body temperature in children younger than 5 years. However, it may be used as a tool for screening for fever in very busy clinics and emergency room at a fever cutoff of 37.7°C.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature , Rectum/physiology , Temporal Arteries/physiology , Thermometers , Thermometry/methods , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
2.
Niger Med J ; 55(4): 338-41, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25114371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many mothers still rely on palpation to determine if their children have fever at home before deciding to seek medical attention or administer self-medications. This study was carried out to determine the accuracy of subjective assessment of fever by Nigerian mothers in Under-5 Children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Each eligible child had a tactile assessment of fever by the mother after which the axillary temperature was measured. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 19 (IBM Inc. Chicago Illinois, USA, 2010). RESULT: A total of 113 mother/child pairs participated in the study. Palpation overestimates fever by 24.6%. Irrespective of the surface of the hand used for palpation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of tactile assessment were 82.4%, 37.1%, 51.9% and 71.9%, respectively. The use of the palmer surface of the hand had a better sensitivity (95.2%) than the dorsum of the hand (69.2%). The use of multiple sites had better sensitivity (86.7%) than the use of single site (76.2%). CONCLUSION: Tactile assessment of childhood fevers by mothers is still a relevant screening tool for the presence or absence fever. Palpation with the palmer surface of the hand using multiple sites improves the reliability of tactile assessment of fever.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...