Two-year assessment of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Post hoc analysis of the ASSET-K study.

BACKGROUND: There have only been a few reports about use of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), suggesting that the safety of these agents has not been sufficiently demonstrated. We performed a comparative review of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin for Japanese patients with T2DM managed in the real-world clinical setting. METHODS: An age-stratified analysis was performed of 831 patients who were treated with sitagliptin for 2 years. Parameters assessed included the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body weight, serum creatinine, and adverse events. HbA1c and the incidence of hypoglycemia were also evaluated in patients treated with sitagliptin and a sulfonylurea (SU), who were divided into three age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, and ≥75 years). RESULTS: Comparison of glycemic control parameters, laboratory values, and adverse events revealed significant improvement of HbA1c, casual postprandial plasma glucose, and fasting plasma glucose in each age group with no change in body weight. Serum creatinine increased significantly in all age groups. Hypoglycemia only occurred in patients who received combined treatment with an SU and sitagliptin, and there was no age-related difference in its incidence. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c was improved by 2 years of sitagliptin therapy in all three age groups, and age did not seem to influence the incidence of hypoglycemic events. These results confirm the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in patients ≥ 75 years old, suggesting that it is also useful for treating elderly patients with T2DM.

Is a switch from insulin therapy to liraglutide possible in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of switching from insulin to the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. METHODS: The subjects were 231 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus being treated with liraglutide for the first time. For 161 patients, liraglutide was continued for 24 weeks (continuation group), and for 70 patients, liraglutide was discontinued before 24 weeks (discontinuation group). Fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose were evaluated before the switch to liraglutide (baseline) and at 12 and 24 weeks of administration. Trends in HbA1c and weight were compared at 12 and 24 weeks of administration. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify clinical factors predicting a successful switch to liraglutide. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis with ΔHbA1c as the dependent variable in the continuation group indicated that HbA1c at 12 weeks of administration decreased with higher baseline HbA1c and increased with higher baseline daily insulin doses. Multiple regression analysis with Δweight as the dependent variable indicated that Δweight at 24 weeks of liraglutide administration was higher with higher baseline daily insulin doses and longer duration of diabetes. Based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, cut-off values of 19 units for daily insulin dose and nine years for duration of diabetes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from insulin to liraglutide therapy is possible for carefully selected patients. Daily insulin dosage and duration of insulin therapy appear to be clinically useful indicators for the efficacy of liraglutide therapy.

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin monotherapy and combination therapy in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

UNLABELLED: (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00221.x, 2012) Aims/Introduction: To determine the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin monotherapy and combination therapy in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients after 3 months' therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of 741 type 2 diabetes patients was carried out; 110 received sitagliptin monotherapy, and 631 received combination therapy with sitagliptin when other oral medications were insufficient. The primary outcome measure was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measured at 0, 4 and 12 weeks of sitagliptin therapy. RESULTS: In the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, HbA1c decreased significantly after 12 weeks. Target HbA1c (<7%) was achieved in 39.1% overall. On logistic regression analysis, baseline HbA1c was the strongest contributing factor for achieving target HbA1c; baseline body mass index and duration of diabetes were also significant factors. A total of 82 patients (11%) were unresponsive to sitagliptin. These patients' baseline body mass index was significantly higher and their baseline HbA1c was significantly lower than those of patients who responded to sitagliptin. The most commonly co-administered drugs were sulfonylureas (508 patients). In these patients, the dose of sulfonylurea decreased with time. In 66 patients whose sulfonylurea dosage was reduced when sitagliptin was started, HbA1c and bodyweight decreased significantly after 12 weeks. A total of 24 patients receiving sulfonylureas had mild hypoglycemia, but none discontinued sitagliptin. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin was effective and safe as both monotherapy and combination therapy in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients. When sulfonylureas were ineffective, sitagliptin improved glycemic control. In patients whose sulfonylurea dose was reduced at the start of sitagliptin, blood glucose improved and bodyweight decreased after 12 weeks.