Retrospective Analysis of Onychomycosis Risk Factors Using the 2003-2014 National Inpatient Sample.

INTRODUCTION: Onychomycosis, a fungal nail infection, is associated with significant morbidity and negative impact on quality of life. Therefore, understanding associated risk factors may inform onychomycosis screening guidelines. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study investigated common demographic and comorbidity risk factors among hospitalized patients using the National Inpatient Sample. METHODS: The 2003-2014 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify onychomycosis cases and age and sex matched controls in a 1:2 ratio. Chi-square tests and T-tests for independent samples were utilized to compare categorical and continuous patient factors. Demographic and comorbidity variables significant (P < 0.05) on univariate analysis were analyzed via a multivariate regression model with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.0029). RESULTS: 119,662 onychomycosis cases and 239,324 controls were identified. Compared to controls, onychomycosis patients frequently were White (69.0% versus 68.0%; P < 0.001), Black (17.9% versus 5.8%; P < 0.0001), and insured by Medicare or Medicaid (80.1% versus 71.1%; P < 0.0001). Patients had greater hospital stays (9.69 versus 5.39 days; P < 0.0001) and costs ($39,925 versus $36,720; P < 0.001) compared to controls. On multivariate analysis, onychomycosis was commonly associated with tinea pedis (odds ratio [OR]: 111.993; P < 0.0001), human immunodeficiency virus (OR: 4.372; P < 0.001), venous insufficiency (OR: 6.916; P < 0.0001), and psoriasis (OR: 3.668; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Onychomycosis patients had longer hospital stays and greater costs compared to controls. Black patients were disproportionately represented among cases compared to controls. Onychomycosis was associated with tinea pedis, venous insufficiency, human immunodeficiency virus, psoriasis, obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2), peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes with chronic complications, suggesting that inpatients with onychomycosis should be screened for these conditions.

Smoking impacts outcomes in transcervical Zenker's diverticulectomy.

PURPOSE: There is sparse literature discussing the impact of smoking on postoperative outcomes following surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. In this study, we seek to characterize differences in the management and outcomes of open Zenker's diverticulectomy based on patient smoking status. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This paper is a retrospective cohort review. The 2005-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients undergoing open Zenker's diverticulectomy. Chi-square and multivariable logistic regression were performed to determine statistical associations between postoperative outcomes and smoking status. RESULTS: Of the 715 identified patients, 70 (9.8 %) were smokers and 645 (91.2 %) were non-smokers. Smokers were younger than non-smokers (mean 63.9 vs. 71.7 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a prolonged operative time (20.0 % vs. 11.6 %, p = 0.044). On multivariable regression analysis controlling for demographics and comorbidities, smokers had greater odds than non-smokers for developing overall postoperative complications (OR: 2.776, p = 0.013), surgical infections (OR: 3.194, p = 0.039), medical complications (OR: 3.563, p = 0.011), and medical infections (OR: 1.247, p = 0.016). Smokers also had greater odds for requiring ventilation/intubation (OR: 8.508, p = 0.025) and having a prolonged postoperative stay (OR: 2.425, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients undergoing transcervical Zenker's diverticulectomy, smokers are at increased risk for overall complications, medical complications, medical infections, surgical infections, prolonged postoperative stay, and ventilation/intubation.

Analysis of Utilization, Cost, and Prescription Trends of Common Immunosuppressive Medications Among Medicare Patients 2013 to 2019.

Immunosuppressive medications are commonly used to manage dermatological conditions, including atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and bullous diseases. However, cost and adverse effect profile, including increased risk of infections, are important considerations.

Increased Interest in Oral Minoxidil for Hair Loss Treatment Following Publication of August 2022 New York Times Article: A Google Trends Analysis.

Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of hair loss, with negative impact on patient quality of life. Oral minoxidil is used off-label for AGA treatment. We hypothesized increased public interest in oral minoxidil for hair loss treatment following the New York Times (NYT) Article on oral minoxidil: "An Old Medicine Grows New Hair for Pennies a Day, Doctors Say." The objective of this study was to quantify interest in oral minoxidil for hair loss treatment before and after the NYT article and help inform dermatologists about treatments of interest to their patients. Method: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of Google Trends evaluating relative prevalence of "oral minoxidil," "minoxidil," "hair loss," and "Rogaine®" 2/2022-5/2023. t tests compared mean search volume and linear regression analysis quantified changes in public interest over time. Results: Oral minoxidil and minoxidil search volumes increased from 0.86 to 3.00 and 22.43 to 32.60, respectively, before and after the NYT article (both p < 0.05). Minoxidil searches continually increased by 500,000 searches per month (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There was a significant and sustained increase in Google searches for oral minoxidil after publication of the NYT article, indicating increased patient interest. Larger clinical trials are needed to provide evidence-based care to AGA patients.

Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study): a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and immunoglobulin gamma. Ongoing AIH activity can lead to fibrosis and (decompensated) cirrhosis. Incomplete biochemical response is the most important risk factor for liver transplantation or liver-related mortality. First-line treatment consists of a combination of azathioprine and prednisolone. If CR is not reached, tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used as second-line therapy. Both products are registered for the prevention of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TAC and MMF as second-line treatment for AIH. METHODS: The TAILOR study is a phase IIIB, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial performed in large teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. We will enrol 86 patients with AIH who have not reached CR after at least 6 months of treatment with first-line therapy. Patients are randomised to TAC (0.07 mg/kg/day initially and adjusted by trough levels) or MMF (max 2000 mg/day), stratified by the presence of cirrhosis at inclusion. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 6 months, adverse effects, difference in fibrogenesis, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised controlled trial comparing two second-line therapies for AIH. Currently, second-line treatment is based on retrospective cohort studies. The rarity of AIH is the main issue in clinical research for alternative treatment options. The results of this trial can be implemented in existing international clinical guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05221411 . Retrospectively registered on 3 February 2022; EudraCT number 2021-003420-33. Prospectively registered on 16 June 2021.

HIV Prevalence and HIV Screening History Among a Veterans Association Cohort of People with Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Veterans face high risk for HIV and substance use, and thus could be disproportionately impacted by the HIV and substance use disorder (SUD) "syndemic." HIV prevalence among veterans with SUD is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To project HIV prevalence and lifetime HIV screening history among US veterans with alcohol use disorder (AUD), opioid use disorder (OUD), or both. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data. PARTICIPANTS: We selected three cohorts of veterans with SUD: (1) AUD, (2) OUD, and (3) AUD/OUD. Included veterans had ICD codes for AUD/OUD from 2016 to 2022 recorded in VHA electronic medical records, sourced from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). MAIN MEASURES: We estimated HIV prevalence by dividing the number of veterans who met two out of three criteria (codes for HIV diagnosis, antiretroviral therapy, or HIV screening/monitoring) by the total number of veterans in each cohort. We also estimated lifetime HIV screening history (as documented in VHA data) by cohort. We reported HIV prevalence and screening history by cohort and across demographic/clinical subgroups. KEY RESULTS: Our sample included 669,595 veterans with AUD, 63,787 with OUD, and 57,015 with AUD/OUD. HIV prevalence was highest in the AUD/OUD cohort (3.9%), followed by the OUD (2.1%) and AUD (1.1%) cohorts. Veterans of Black race and Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity, with HCV diagnoses, and aged 50-64 had the highest HIV prevalence in all cohorts. Overall, 12.8%, 29.1%, and 33.1% of the AUD/OUD, OUD, and AUD cohorts did not have history of HIV screening, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HIV prevalence was high in all SUD cohorts, and was highest among veterans with AUD/OUD, with disparities by race/ethnicity and age. A substantial portion of veterans had not received HIV screening in the VHA. Findings highlight room for improvement in HIV prevention and screening services for veterans with SUD.

Dialysis initiation for patients with decompensated cirrhosis when liver transplant is unlikely.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe an approach that emphasizes shared decision-making for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and acute kidney injury when liver transplantation is either not an option, or unlikely to be an option. RECENT FINDINGS: When acute kidney injury occurs on a background of decompensated cirrhosis, outcomes are generally poor. Providers can also be faced with prognostic uncertainty. A lack of guidance from nephrology and hepatology professional societies means that providers rely on expert opinion or institutional practice patterns. SUMMARY: For patients who are unlikely to receive liver transplantation, the occurrence of acute kidney injury represents an opportunity for a goals of care conversation. In this article, we share strategies through which providers can incorporate more shared decision-making when caring for these patients. The approach involves creating prognostic consensus amongst multidisciplinary teams and then relying on skilled communicators to share the prognosis. Palliative care consultation can be useful when teams need assistance in the conversations.

An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH. METHODS: In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: #NCT02900443.

Home Is Where the Match Is: Mentorship and Dermatology Residency Match Trends Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dermatology is one of the most competitive residencies for matching among medical school applicants. A strong connection with a residency program through research or clinical rotations may distinguish between similarly qualified applicants. Our previous study of research-mentor relationships among matched dermatology applicants corroborated the importance of program connections.1 However, the 2020-2021 residency match cycle was uniquely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which prevented applicants from fostering connections with faculty at outside institutions. Our study objectives were to evaluate research-mentor relationships among matched dermatology applicants in the 2020-2021 pandemic match cycle with comparisons to pre-pandemic match cycles.

Adult Burn Inpatients Have Increased Burn Severity and Mortality Compared to Children in Retrospective Analysis of National Inpatient Sample 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic status and comorbidities are associated with increased mortality in patients with external surface burn patients, however differences between pediatric and adult burn populations have not been adequately studied. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to explore the presentation, management, and outcomes of external surface burns across age groups. METHODS: The 2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients with any diagnosis of external body surface burns. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, total charges, length of stay (LOS), number of procedures undergone (NPU), and time from admission to first procedure (TFP) were identified. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify statistical associations with age. RESULTS: 52,335 inpatients were identified with burns, with the majority male (63.6%) and adults (81.8%). Mean age was 50.5 (standard error [SE] 0.1) and 5.5 (SE 0.1) years for adults and children, respectively. Adults had higher prevalence of hypertensive disease (43.5% versus. 1.4%), diabetes mellitus (24.1% versus 0.3%), and obesity (11.7% versus 1.6%) than children (P < 0.001). Adults versus children had higher odds for mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.08-5.89), sepsis (OR 5.16, 95% CI 4.10-6.48), and pneumonia (OR 4.26, 95% CI 3.30-5.50). CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of inpatients with external surface burns, comorbidities, and odds for mortality and complications varied by age. Pediatric patients more often had lower household incomes; however, adults had significantly higher odds for mortality suggesting that age and comorbidity status are more impactful on burn outcomes than socioeconomic status.