Management of immunosuppression and antiviral treatment before and after heart transplant for HIV-associated dilated cardiomyopathy.

Infection with HIV may lead to the development of cardiomyopathy as improved antiretroviral regimens continue to prolong patient life. However, advanced therapeutic options, such as heart transplant, have until recently been precluded to HIV-positive persons. A favorable long-term outcome has been obtained after kidney or liver transplant in HIV-positive recipients fulfilling strict virological and clinical criteria. We recently reported the first heart transplant in a HIV-infected patient carried out in our center. In this article, we detail the major challenges we faced with the management of antiretroviral and immunosuppressive treatments over the first 3 years post-transplant. The patient had developed dilated cardiomyopathy while on antiretroviral treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz. He was in WHO Stage 1 of HIV infection and had normal CD4+ count and persistently undetectable HIV-RNA. In spite of cardiac resynchronization therapy and maximal drug therapy, the patient progressed to end stage heart failure, requiring heart transplant. He was placed on a standard immune suppressive protocol including cyclosporine A and everolimus. Despite its potential pharmacokinetic interaction with efavirenz, everolimus was chosen to reduce the long-term risk of opportunistic neoplasia. Plasma levels of both drugs were monitored and remained within the target range, although high doses of everolimus were needed. There were no infectious, neoplastic or metabolic complications during a 3-year follow-up. In summary, our experience supports previous data showing that cardiac transplantation should not be denied to carefully selected HIV patients. Careful management of drug interactions and adverse events is mandatory.

Role of sildenafil in acute posttransplant right ventricular dysfunction: successful experience in 13 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Superimposed acute right ventricular dysfunction in the setting of preexisting pulmonary hypertension is a nearly fatal complication after heart transplantation. The optimal treatment modality remains a matter of debate. Recently, sildenafil citrate, a nonselective pulmonary vasodilator, has gained popularity in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in transplant candidates. METHODS: Herein we have presented a series of 13 patients in whom sildenafil was used to treat right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension as detected by transesophageal echocardiography and Swan-Ganz right heart catheterization after heart transplant. Their characteristics were mean age 49+/-11.4 years; 38.4% with previous cardiac procedures, 30.8% status I, basal pulmonary vascular resistance index 10.4+/-4.6 WoodU, mean transpulmonary gradient 18.7+/-5.4 mmHg. In addition to conventional inodilator support, we administered 1 to 3 mg per kilogram of sildenafil. Complete hemodynamic measurements were obtained before and after the institution of the therapy and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Within the first 72 hours, acute right ventricular dysfunction resolved in all cases without untoward side effects or significant systemic impact. Sildenafil significantly decreased the transpulmonary gradient and pulmonary vascular resistance index relative to baseline values; 5.6+/-1.82 versus 10.4+/-4.6 WU, (P< .05), 13.5+/-3.4 mm Hg versus 18.7+/-5.4 mm Hg (P< .05), respectively. Improved indices of right ventricular function were observed on echocardiographic monitoring. After 1 month, sildenafil treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Management of acute right ventricular dysfunction in heart transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension using sildenafil proved safe and effective.

Role of immunosuppressive regimen on the incidence and characteristics of cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplantation: a single-center experience with preemptive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective single-center report sought to evaluate the relation of immunosuppressive regimen with the incidence and characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection from 1999 to 2003. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), azathioprine (AZA), and prednisolone associated with either thymoglobulin or ATG high-dosage induction from 1999 to 2000 (AZA, 64 patients [AZA-Thymo = 38 patients and AZA-ATG 26 patients]), or cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisolone with low-dose thymoglobulin induction from 2001 onward (n = 52 patients). Ganciclovir preemptive therapy was guided by pp65 antigenemia monitoring without CMV prophylaxis. RESULTS: The study groups were homogeneous with respect to major perioperative risk factors. Comparing the two AZA subgroups no difference emerged as to percentage of pp65 antigenemia-positive, preemptively treated patients reflecting CMV disease incidence and relapses. AZA-Thymo patient showed significantly shorter time to first positive pp65-antigenemia and higher viral load (AZA-Thymo vs AZA-ATG, P = .004 and P = .009). The two subgroups did not differ with regard to incidence of rejection, superinfection, and graft coronary disease. By shifting from AZA to MMF no difference emerged as to incidence and characteristics of CMV infections, but there was a significant reduction in acute rejection and superinfection (AZA vs MMF P = .001 and P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The distinct immunological properties of thymoglobulin versus ATG significantly altered the pattern of CMV expression. MMF with reduced-dose induction did not engender a higher CMV morbidity.

Evolving practice patterns in heart transplantation: a single-center experience over 15 years.

This analysis is a retrospective characterization of evolving patterns in donor and recipient risk factors for early and late outcomes (survival and freedom from rejection) along with determinants of hospital and 1-year mortality after heart transplantation over a 15-year experience in a single center. Profiles and outcomes were evaluated for procedures performed between 1988 and 1995 (group A, n = 105) versus 1996 and 2003 (group B, n = 218). The following parameters were considered: pretransplant diagnosis, recipient age UNOS status, donor age, total postretrieval ischemic time, donor/recipient size match, and degree of myocardial necrosis at biopsy. Recipients in group B were significantly more compromised as demonstrated by UNOS status (11.4% vs 19.3%; P =.05) and pretransplant pulmonary vascular resistance (2.3 +/- 1.5 vs 3.1 +/- 1.5; P =.04). Marginal donors were more frequently used for group B procedures (21.9% vs 47.7%; P <.0001). Outcomes were significantly more favorable among group B patients in terms of hospital mortality (18.1% vs 10.6%; P =.046), and 1- and 5-year actuarial survival (72.4% vs 83.4%, 60% vs 73.3%, respectively; P =.006). Analysis of the causes of death disclosed a significant reduction in fatal events due to graft failure and acute rejection in group B. No difference emerged with regard to actual freedom from acute rejection. Determinants of hospital mortality were pretransplant diagnosis, UNOS status, donor age, and cardioplegic solution. Transplant era, recipient age, infectious episodes, and ischemic necrosis at biopsy were risk factors for 1-year mortality. We conclude that despite extensive usage of marginal donors and selection of worse candidates, significantly better outcomes were achieved due to improvements in global management strategies.

Midterm results of a prospective randomized comparison of two different rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction therapies after heart transplantation.

This prospective randomized study compared the effects in heart transplant recipients of thymoglobulin and ATG, two rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte antibodies available for induction therapy. Among 40 patients (29 men and 11 women, mean age: 40.7 +/- 14 years) undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation, 20 were randomly allocated to receive induction with thymoglobulin (group A) and 20 to ATG-fresenius (group B). Comparisons between the two groups included early posttransplant (6 months) incidence of acute rejection episodes (grade >/= 1B), bouts of steroid-resistant rejection, time to first rejection, survival, graft atherosclerosis, infections, and malignancies. The study groups displayed similar preoperative and demographic variables. No significant difference was found with regard to actuarial survival (P =.98), freedom from rejection (P =.68), number of early rejections > 1B (P =.67), mean time to first early cardiac rejection (P =.13), number of steroid-resistant rejections (P =.69). Cytomegalovirus reactivations were more frequent among group A (65%) than group B (30%; P =.028). New infections due to cytomegalovirus occurred only in group A (four patients; 20%; P =.05). No cases of malignancies were observed at a mean follow-up of 32.8 +/- 8.9 months. Although thymoglobulin and ATG showed equivalent efficacy for rejection prevention, they have different immunological properties. In particular, thymoglobulin seems to be associated with a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease/reactivation.

Efficacy and limitations of preemptive therapy against cytomegalovirus infections in heart transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease often represents a serious complication that promotes opportunistic infections in heart transplant recipients. In this study we evaluated the impact of preemptive gancylovir therapy, guided by pp65 antigenemia on the morbidity associated with viral reactivation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have performed a CMV infection surveillance program since March 1999, with antigenemia pp65 determinations weekly for the first 2 months biweekly in the third months, and monthly to the sixth month. Patients with pp65 antigenemia value >/= 10 positive cells per 2 x 10(5) polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) were treated with intravenous gancyclovir followed by 1 month of oral gancyclovir. RESULTS: Among the 107 patients who underwent the virological monitoring, 80 were pp65 antigenemia-positive with preemptive therapy administered in 48 cases. Five patients displayed symptomatic CMV disease (4.7% vs 18% rate in the period of 1988 to 1998 before the introduction of virologic monitoring; P <.01). We observed only one case of gancyclovir-resistant pneumonia which was successfully treated with foscarnet. CMV recurrence in 10 patients required a second cycle of gancyclovir treatment. Our experience included 13 opportunistic infections (12.7%) with 11 antigenemia-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive therapy drastically reduces the incidence of CMV disease and the associated morbidity. Compared to universal prophylaxis, this approach may avoid unnecessary pharmacologic treatment in more than 50% of transplant recipients. Indeed, preemptive therapy does not fully prevent CMV disease, because it may manifest at the first antigenemia determination, and furthermore may select gancyclovir-resistant strains.

Pilot study on prevention of lung injury during surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: no evident improvements with celsior flushing through the pulmonary artery.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative respiratory failure is a frequent and serious complication in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. Experimental evidence suggests that pulmonary artery perfusion using hypothermic protective solutions helps prevent lung injury. The aim of this pilot prospective study was to evaluate the effect of pulmonary artery flushing during selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) on lung function. METHODS: Twenty patients referred for acute type A aortic dissection, who were free from preoperative respiratory dysfunction, were assigned prospectively and alternately to two treatment groups. Pulmonary flushing was performed during SCP in group P (10 patients), while conventional Kazui technique was applied in group N (10 patients). Lung perfusion consisted of single-shot hypothermic pulmonary artery flush with Celsior. Lung function was evaluated by intubation time, scoring of chest radiograms at 12 hours after CPB, and PaO2/FiO2 assessed from immediately before surgery to 72 hours after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS: Incidence of pre, intra and post operative determinants of lung dysfunction proved homogeneous in both groups. Lung oxygenation function showed a marked post operative decline followed by a slow improvement in both groups. Analysis of respiratory ratios did not disclose significant differences even though the flushed group had a better performance in all study patients. The incidence of prolonged ventilator support (longer than 72 hours) (30% vs 20%, p = NS) and severity of x-ray pulmonary infiltrate score were comparable (mean score 1.7 +/- 0.71 vs 1.6 +/- 0.68, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary artery flushing with Celsior solution does not seem to provide an effective preservation of lung function.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a prospective randomized study on the timing of perioperative intraaortic balloon pump support.

In this prospective trial the results of preoperative and intraoperative IABP in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared. Sixty CABG patients with preoperative LVEF < or = 0.30 were enrolled: in group A patients (n=30) IABP was started within 2 hours preoperatively; in group B (n=30) it was instituted intraoperatively before weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Cardiac performance was assessed through Swan-Ganz catheter monitoring and daily echocardiography. Hospital survival, length of IABP support, intubation, ICU and hospital stay, need for postoperative inotropic drugs and incidence of myocardial infarction were compared between the two groups. Survival in group A patients proved significantly higher (P=0.047). Cardiac performance after myocardial revascularization improved in both groups with significantly better outcomes in group A patients (P<0.001). Doses of inotropic drugs (dobutamine, enoximone) were lower in group A (P=0.001; P=0.004) and duration shorter (P<0.001; P<0.001). No major IABP-related complication was observed.

Deep sternal wound infection: the role of early debridement surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective chart review study aimed to evaluate whether a more aggressive staged approach can reduce morbidity and mortality following post-cardiotomy deep sternal wound infection. METHODS: Between 1979 and 2000, 14620 patients underwent open heart surgery: mediastinitis developed in 124 patients (0.85%). Patients were divided in two groups: in 62 patients (Group A) (1979-1994) an initial attempt of conservative antibiotic therapy was the rule followed by surgical approach in case of failure; in 62 patients (Group B) (1995-2000) the treatment was staged in three phases: (1) wound debridement, removal of wires and sutures, closed irrigation for 10 days; (2) in case of failure open dressing with sugar and hyperbaric therapy (11 patients, 17%); (3) delayed healing and negative wound cultures mandated plastic reconstruction (three patients, 4%). Categorical values were compared using the Chi-square test, continuous data were compared by unpaired t-test. RESULTS: Incidence of mediastinitis was higher in Group B (62 out of 5535; 1.3%) than in Group A (62 out of 9085; 0.7%) (P=0.007). Mean interval between diagnosis and treatment was shorter in Group B (18+/-6 days) than in group A (38+/-7 days) (P=0.001). Hospital mortality was higher in Group A (19/62; 31%) than in Group B (1 out of 62; 1.6%) (P<0.001). Hospital stay was shorter in Group B (30.5+/-3 days) than in group A (44+/-9 days) (P=0.001). In Group B complete healing was observed in all the 61 survivors: 47 cases (76%) after Stage 1; 11 (18%) after Stage 2; three (4.8%) after Stage 3. CONCLUSIONS: Although partially biased by the fact that the two compared groups draw back to different decades, this study showed that an aggressive therapeutic protocol can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality of deep sternal wound infection.

Determinants and prognostic value of ischemic necrosis in early biopsies following heart transplant.

To evaluate the impact of early ischemic necrosis (IN) on the early and late outcome of heart transplantation, we reviewed our 11-year experience. Between January 1988 and June 1999, 207 heart transplants were performed in 205 patients (174 male and 31 female). Criteria for donor and recipient selection, and protocols for postoperative immunosuppression and rejection monitoring have remained unchanged over this period. Three different cardioplegic solutions were employed in graft preservation: St. Thomas Hospital solution in the earliest 31 cases (15%), University of Wisconsin solution in 96 cases (46.4%), and Celsior solution in the last 80 cases (38.6%). All patients who underwent at least one endomyocardial biopsy (176 patients) were divided into two groups according to the findings of IN within the early 3 postoperative months (group A, 49 patients with IN; group B, 127 patients without IN). The following variables were estimated in each group: donor and recipient age, ischemic time, type of cardioplegia, late mortality for cardiac causes, incidence of grade >2 rejection within the first 6 postoperative months, late incidence of grade >2 rejection, late incidence of NYHA class >II. No significant difference was found in any parameter between the two groups, except for the type of cardioplegic solution. A significantly higher incidence of ischemic necrosis in hearts preserved with St. Thomas solution was found (P < 0.001). Although pathology findings show that extracellular solutions carried a higher risk of early IN, no associated significant impairment in terms of late survival and event-free rate was observed in recipients with early IN.