ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. OBJECTIVE: We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (e.g., lethality, short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Design: Multi-year, cross-sectional, descriptive design. SETTING: An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women, 27 men; age: 33±15 y; pre-treatment rectal temperature [TREC]: 41.5±0.9°C). INTERVENTIONS: Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed TREC ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction (CNS) EHS was diagnosed and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice-water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index ≥0.88 for items and scale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey responses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal and 76% (32/42) indicated it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week post-EHS; 69% (29/42) stated EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. CONCLUSIONS: Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed towards helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Exertional heatstroke (EHS) is a life-threatening condition that requires quick recognition and cooling for survival. Experts recommend using cooling modalities that reduce rectal temperature (TREC) faster than 0.16°C/min though rates above 0.08°C/min are considered "acceptable." Hyperthermic individuals treated in body bags filled with ice water (â¼3°C) have excellent cooling rates (0.28 ± 0.09°C/min). However, clinicians may not have access to large amounts of ice or ice water when treating EHS victims. The purpose of this study was to determine if using a body bag filled with water near the upper limits of expert recommendations for EHS treatment would produce acceptable (>0.08°C/min) or "ideal (>0.16°C/min)" TREC cooling rates or different nadir values.METHODS: A total of 12 individuals (9 men, 3 women; age: 21 ± 2 yr; mass: 74.6 ± 10.2 kg; height: 179.5 ± 9.6 cm) exercised in the heat until TREC was 39.5°C. They lay supine while 211.4 ± 19.5 L of 10°C (Ten) or 15°C (Fifteen) water was poured into a body bag. Subjects cooled until TREC was 38°C. They exited the body bag and rested in the heat for 10 min.RESULTS: Subjects exercised in similar conditions and for similar durations (Ten = 46.3 ± 8.6 min, Fifteen = 46.2 ± 7.8 min). TREC cooling rates were faster in Ten than Fifteen (Ten = 0.18 ± 0.07°C/min, Fifteen = 0.14 ± 0.09°C/min). TREC nadir was slightly higher in Fifteen (37.3 ± 0.2°C) than Ten (37.1 ± 0.3°C).DISCUSSION: Body bag cooling rates met expert definitions of acceptable (Fifteen) and ideal (Ten) for EHS treatment. This information is valuable for clinicians who do not have access to or the resources for ice water cooling to treat EHS.Miller KC, Amaria NY. Body bag cooling with two different water temperatures for the treatment of hyperthermia. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(4):194-199.
