Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Rehabilitation after Childbirth Able to Prevent the Onset of Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Case-Control Study.

Background and Objectives: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) represent the first-line approach to pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs). Recently, studies have shown a synergy between the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles, hypothesizing that the anatomical and functional integrity of the abdominal wall plays a role in the prevention of pelvic floor disorders. Some studies have shown a significant correlation between diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Nevertheless, the evidence reported in the literature is controversial and based on low-quality data. The aim of the study is to clarify whether DRA-specific abdominal rehabilitation is needed in women with SUI after childbirth. Materials and Methods: All consecutive women who had at least one delivery and complained of symptoms of pure SUI that were urodynamically proven were considered for the study. The group of symptomatic patients was compared with a series of consecutive women, identified during the same study period, without any symptoms of SUI. In both groups, we measured the inter-rectal distance (IRD) with an ultrasound scanner above and below the navel. Results: A total of 102 women eligible for the study group and 100 women who did not report any symptoms of SUI were enrolled. The inter-rectal distance above the umbilicus showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.12 ± 0.98 vs. 2.1 ± 0.77; p = 0.94). In contrast, the data from the sub-umbilical measurements showed a significant difference. Surprisingly, the asymptomatic group showed significantly greater (0.98 ± 0.9 vs. 1.33 ± 0.87 p-value: 0.009) IRD compared to the symptomatic group. Conclusions: The study shows that DRA is not a risk factor for SUI in women after childbirth. Therefore, specific abdominal wall rehabilitation after childbirth does not seem to be indicated.

The Role of Different Healing Abutment Sizes in Tissue Volume Preservation of Molar Sockets After Immediate Tooth Extraction and Implant Placement: A Multicenter Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of different healing abutment designs in compensating for the buccolingual volumetric tissue change that occurs following flapless single-tooth immediate extraction placement in the molar area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in need of extraction and replacement of a first or second molar in the mandible or maxilla were consecutively recruited. Immediately after extraction and implant placement, an abutment was connected. Five different types of abutments were randomly selected to be used for each case. The study population was divided into five categories according to abutment design: 5-mm diameter healing abutment (group 1); 6-mm diameter healing abutment (group 2); 7.5-mm diameter healing abutment (group 3); provisional restoration (group 4); and customized healing abutment (group 5). The buccopalatal dimension (BPD) was measured on the study casts at 1, 3, and 5 mm apical to the free gingival margin, and horizontal volumetric changes were compared between baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 267 implants were inserted in 246 patients. The breakdown of placed implants for each group was as follows: 67 implants in group 1; 64 in group 2; 71 in group 3; 33 in group 4; and 32 in group 5. Changes in the mean horizontal ridge dimension were as follows. After 6 months in group 1, BPD diminished at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm distance from the free gingival margin, respectively, by 4.21 ± 0.158, 3.38 ± 0. 178 and 2.35 ± 0.178 mm. In group 2, BPD diminished at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm distance from the free gingival margin, respectively, by 3.16 ± 0.198, 2.56 ± 0.198, and 1.62 ± 0.198 mm. In group 3, BPD diminished at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm distance from the free gingival margin, respectively, by 2.53 ± 0.138, 2.16 ± 0.144, and 1.56 ± 0.144 mm. In group 4, BPD diminished at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm distance from the free gingival margin, respectively, by 1.11 ± 0.179, 1.23 ± 0.179, and 1.12 ± 0.179 mm. In group 5, BPD diminished at 1-, 3-, and 5-mm distance from the free gingival margin, respectively, by 0.25 ± 0.225, 0.30 ± 0.225, and 0.19 ± 0.225 mm. Mixed-effect regression and post hoc means comparisons were used to model the impact of the restoration technique, height of measurement, and time on BPD using a significance reference level of .05. Statistical analysis showed that the type of abutment, the height of measurement, and the time significantly influenced the BPD and that there were complex interaction effects between these variables. CONCLUSION: The observed volumetric soft tissue changes in the 6-month short-term follow-up appeared to vary based on the use of different healing abutment sizes that were connected to implants placed immediately after tooth extraction in the molar area. In particular, the use of a customized healing abutment resulted in preservation of the original horizontal dimension of the molar soft tissue.

Guided Tissue Preservation: Clinical Application of a New Provisional Restoration Design to Preserve Soft Tissue Contours for Single-Tooth Immediate Implant Restorations in the Esthetic Area.

This article aims to evaluate the effect of anatomically designed, single-unit provisional restorations on soft tissue preservation following immediate implant placement. Patients in need of a single-tooth replacement in the esthetic area were recruited for this study. An immediate provisional restoration with a transmucosal area anatomically designed to support the soft tissue was used for every patient. The horizontal volumetric tissue changes and the presence and amount of vertical recession were measured at baseline (T0) and after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3). Sixty-three patients received 66 implants that were placed into fresh extraction sites. The average follow-up time was 48 months (range: 24 to 60 months). All implant restorations were successful, and the cumulative implant survival rate and success of restorations was 100%. After 6 months, the mean horizontal ridge measured midbuccally had increased by 0.10 ± 0.10 mm at 1 mm from the free gingival margin, had decreased by 0.09 ± 0.10 mm at 3 mm, and had decreased by 0.20 ± 0.10 mm at 5 mm. In addition, the mean recession at the midbuccal surfaces was 0.04 ± 0.37 mm. Measurements were made clinically and compared to measurements made on the casts. According to the results of this study, the use of customized anatomically designed immediate provisional restorations following single-tooth extraction and immediate implant placement appeared to minimize the loss of tissue volume that results from postextraction bone remodeling, thus optimizing the final esthetic result.

Immediate Loading of Implants Inserted Through Impacted Teeth in the Esthetic Area: A Series of 10 Cases with up to 7 Years of Follow-up.

The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the survival rate and the incidence of complications of implants inserted and immediately loaded in sites where an impacted tooth was present in the anterior maxillary or mandibular arches (incisor to premolar). The implants were immediately inserted, drilling through the impacted teeth. Site preparation started in the crestal bone and continued into the impacted tooth's enamel and dentin. Seven patients were treated and 11 implants were inserted, 3 in the mandibular arch and 8 in the maxillary arch. All implants healed uneventfully without any adverse clinical or radiographic signs or symptoms, resulting in a success rate of 100%. Once loaded, the implants were in function and monitored for 5 to 7 years. Although more studies and a larger sample size are needed to validate this unconventional procedure, it may be considered as a possible clinical option to overcome invasive procedures and surgical complications related to the extraction of impacted teeth.

Omission of axillary dissection after a positive sentinel lymph-node: Implications in the multidisciplinary treatment of operable breast cancer.

Omission of axillary dissection in women with breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel-node biopsy is a major advancement in the management of this disease. Supported by a sound rationale and confirmed by prospective, randomized trials, omission of axillary dissection is now recommended in women who have undergone breast conserving surgery and who are candidate to adjuvant radiotherapy. Because breast cancer is best managed in the context of a multidisciplinary team, this surgical shift in the paradigm is expected to have implications that extend also to the other specialties involved in the team. In fact, the full evaluation of the axillary tumor burden has been historically considered an essential part of tumor staging and the absolute number of involved node critical information to tailor post-surgical treatments. Lack of this information in a patient with axillary involvement documented by a positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy may represent a challenge when deciding on further, post-surgical treatments. This review will address the critical aspects and the potential implications of omission of axillary dissection in the context of the multidisciplinary breast team.