ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To conduct cost-utility and budget impact analysis of providing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy versus no treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Colombia from a third-party payer perspective. METHODS: We used a Markov model to assess the cost-utility and budget impact analysis of CPAP in patients over 40 years old with moderate to severe OSA. Data on effectiveness and utility values were obtained from published literature. A discount rate of 5% was applied for outcomes and costs. ICER was calculated and compared against the threshold estimated for Colombia, which is 86% of the GDP per capita. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the base case analysis showed the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with CPAP therapy was COP$3,503,804 (USD$1,011 in 2020 prices). The budget impact analysis showed that the adoption of CPAP therapy in the target population would lead to a cumulative net budget impact of COP$411,722 million (USD$118,784,412 in, 2020 prices) over five years of time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP was cost-effective compared to no-treatment in OSA. According to the budget impact analysis, adopting this technology would require a budget allocation that is partially offset by reduced number of strokes and traffic accident events.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Adult , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Colombia , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
Antecedentes: La pérdida de visión tiene consecuencias tanto en la salud como en la estabilidad económica, ya que promueve retrasos en el desarrollo emocional, social, además de reducciones en la productividad laboral. Objetivo: Estimar la carga económica de la degeneración macular asociada a la edad neovascular (DMAEn) y el edema macular diabético (EMD) en Colombia para el año 2022. Método: Para una perspectiva social se incluyeron costos directos utilizando la aproximación de Bottom-up y costos indirectos relacionados con la pérdida de productividad. Resultados: El costo directo de un paciente con DMAEn fue 5.974 USD$ desde una base teórica. A nivel nacional, la DMAEn costaría 179,9 millones USD$. Los costos indirectos de DMAEn se estimaron en 13,9 millones USD$. Los costos directos teóricos en EMD fueron 741,6 millones USD$. El costo nacional sería de 132,04 millones USD$. Para los costos indirectos de EMD, se estimó un costo de 93,3 millones USD$. Conclusiones: La DMAEn y el EMD tienen un alto impacto para el sistema de salud y la sociedad.
Background: The vision loss has consequences for both health and economic stability, since it promotes delays in emotional and social development, as well as reductions in labor productivity. Objective: To estimate the economic burden of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in Colombia for 2022. Method: For a social perspective, direct costs were included using the bottom-up approach, and indirect costs related to lost productivity. Results: The direct costs of treating a patient with AMD were USD $5,974 from a theoretical background. At national level, the AMD would cost USD $179.9 million. The AMD indirect cost in Colombia was estimated in USD $13.9 million. Patients theoretical direct cost of DME was USD $741.6 million. The cost at national level is USD $132.04 million. Regarding the indirect costs result for DME, a cost of USD $93.31 million was estimated. Conclusions: The AMD and the DME have a considerable impact on the health system and society.
