ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the clinical, obstetric and neonatal parameters between patients with > 34-week gestation having severe preeclampsia receiving magnesium sulphate and those with > 34-week gestation with preeclampsia but not receiving magnesium sulphate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-centre prospective study studied 60 patients in each of the two groups. Magnesium sulphate was administered by Pritchard regimen as per standard protocol. Standard obstetric management was followed for both groups. In the severe preeclampsia/eclampsia group, maternal blood sample was analysed for serum magnesium levels. The duration of exposure, the amount of magnesium sulphate received and time elapsed between last dose of magnesium sulphate and delivery were all noted. Neonatal assessment was done. The various parameters including age, parity, blood pressure, mode of termination of pregnancy, NICU admission rate, incidence of hypotonia in the newborn and other neonatal parameters were tabulated and compared. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with respect to age and parity. Need for induction of labour was higher in the group with severe preeclampsia/eclampsia. Rate of LSCS and birth weights were comparable between the two groups. NICU admission rate and incidence of hypotonia were higher in those who received magnesium sulphate. Amount of magnesium sulphate received and total duration of magnesium sulphate did not correlate with NICU admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal morbidity, in terms of higher NICU admission rates and hypotonia, is higher in patients receiving magnesium sulphate.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Various medical methods for second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) exist. Misoprostol alone has been used with myriad variations in route and dosage. Comparison between oral and vaginal routes of misoprostol forms the basis of this study. METHODS: This was a prospective comparative study of misoprostol for second-trimester (14-20 weeks) MTP, comparing oral versus vaginal routes. Sixty patients were randomly allotted to two groups; 30 received oral misoprostol 400 µg 4 h up to a maximum of five doses (2000 µg), and 30 received vaginal misoprostol in the same dose and duration. In both groups, oxytocin infusion was started if abortion did not occur. Efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol, induction-abortion interval (AI) and need for surgical intervention were analyzed. RESULTS: Both groups were well matched in terms of age, parity, previous LSCS, mean gestational age and indication for MTP. Overall mean induction-abortion interval was 19.59 h (21.66 vs. 18.57 h, oral vs. vaginal, respectively), with vaginal group taking lesser time (p 0.09). Sixty percentage in oral group required five doses, while 70% in vaginal group required 3-4 doses of misoprostol (p 0.010). 23.7 versus 6.7% in oral versus vaginal group required check curettage (p 0.038). There were no major complications, and there was only one failure in oral group. CONCLUSIONS: Though both oral and vaginal misoprostol are safe, vaginal route appears to be more efficacious for second-trimester MTP.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medical method of abortion (MMA) is a safe, efficient, and affordable method of abortion. However, incomplete abortion is a known side effect. OBJECTIVE: To study incomplete abortion due to medication abortion and compare to spontaneous incomplete abortion and to study referral practices and prescriptions in cases of incomplete abortion following MMA. METHOD: Prospective observational study of 100 women with first trimester incomplete abortion, divided into two groups (spontaneous or following MMA), was administered a questionnaire which included information regarding onset of bleeding, treatment received, use of medications for abortion, its prescription, and administration. Comparison of two groups was done using Fisher exact test (SPSS 21.0 software). RESULTS: Thirty percent of incomplete abortions were seen following MMA; possible reasons being self-administration or prescription by unregistered practitioners, lack of examination, incorrect dosage and drugs, and lack of follow-up. Complications such as collapse, blood requirement, and fever were significantly higher in these patients compared to spontaneous abortion group. CONCLUSION: The side effects of incomplete abortions following MMA can be avoided by the following standard guidelines. Self medication, over- the-counter use, and prescription by unregistered doctors should be discouraged and reported, and need of follow-up should be emphasized.
