Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Biol Med ; 174: 108407, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603902

ABSTRACT

Feature selection and machine learning algorithms can be used to analyze Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) data and identify potential disease biomarkers. Reproducibility of identified biomarkers is critical for them to be useful for clinical research; however, genotyping platforms and selection criteria for individuals to be genotyped affect the reproducibility of identified biomarkers. To assess biomarkers reproducibility, we collected five SNPs datasets from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) and explored several data integration strategies. While combining datasets can lead to a reduction in classification accuracy, it has the potential to improve the reproducibility of potential biomarkers. We evaluated the agreement among different strategies in terms of the SNPs that were identified as potential Parkinson's disease (PD) biomarkers. Our findings indicate that, on average, 93% of the SNPs identified in a single dataset fail to be identified in other datasets. However, through dataset integration, this lack of replication is reduced to 62%. We discovered fifty SNPs that were identified at least twice, which could potentially serve as novel PD biomarkers. These SNPs are indirectly linked to PD in the literature but have not been directly associated with PD before. These findings open up new potential avenues of investigation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Machine Learning , Parkinson Disease , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Parkinson Disease/metabolism , Humans , Databases, Genetic , Reproducibility of Results , Genetic Markers/genetics
2.
Sci Data ; 7(1): 243, 2020 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686687

ABSTRACT

The Hydrometeorological Sandbox - École de technologie supérieure (HYSETS) is a rich, comprehensive and large-scale database for hydrological modelling covering 14425 watersheds in North America. The database includes data covering the period 1950-2018 depending on the type and source of data. The data include a wide array of hydrometeorological data required to perform hydrological and climate change impact studies: (1) watershed properties including boundaries, area, elevation slope, land use and other physiographic information; (2) hydrometric gauging station discharge time-series; (3) precipitation, maximum and minimum daily air temperature time-series from weather station records and from (4) the SCDNA infilled gauge meteorological dataset; (5) the NRCan and Livneh gridded interpolated products' meteorological data; (6) ERA5 and ERA5-Land reanalysis data; and (7) the SNODAS and ERA5-Land snow water equivalent estimates. All data have been processed and averaged at the watershed scale, and provides a solid basis for hydrological modelling, climate change impact studies, model calibration assessment, regionalization method evaluation and essentially any study requiring access to large amounts of spatiotemporally varied hydrometeorological data.

3.
J Am Water Resour Assoc ; 55(3): 559-577, 2019 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34316250

ABSTRACT

Representing hydrologic connectivity of non-floodplain wetlands (NFWs) to downstream waters in process-based models is an emerging challenge relevant to many research, regulatory, and management activities. We review four case studies that utilize process-based models developed to simulate NFW hydrology. Models range from a simple, lumped parameter model to a highly complex, fully distributed model. Across case studies, we highlight appropriate application of each model, emphasizing spatial scale, computational demands, process representation, and model limitations. We end with a synthesis of recommended "best modeling practices" to guide model application. These recommendations include: (1) clearly articulate modeling objectives, and revisit and adjust those objectives regularly; (2) develop a conceptualization of NFW connectivity using qualitative observations, empirical data, and process-based modeling; (3) select a model to represent NFW connectivity by balancing both modeling objectives and available resources; (4) use innovative techniques and data sources to validate and calibrate NFW connectivity simulations; and (5) clearly articulate the limits of the resulting NFW connectivity representation. Our review and synthesis of these case studies highlights modeling approaches that incorporate NFW connectivity, demonstrates tradeoffs in model selection, and ultimately provides actionable guidance for future model application and development.

4.
Front Ecol Environ ; 15(6): 319-327, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30505246

ABSTRACT

Wetlands across the globe provide extensive ecosystem services. However, many wetlands - especially those surrounded by uplands, often referred to as geographically isolated wetlands (GIWs) - remain poorly protected. Protection and restoration of wetlands frequently requires information on their hydrologic connectivity to other surface waters, and their cumulative watershed-scale effects. The integration of measurements and models can supply this information. However, the types of measurements and models that should be integrated are dependent on management questions and information compatibility. We summarize the importance of GIWs in watersheds and discuss what wetland connectivity means in both science and management contexts. We then describe the latest tools available to quantify GIW connectivity and explore crucial next steps to enhancing and integrating such tools. These advancements will ensure that appropriate tools are used in GIW decision making and maintaining the important ecosystem services that these wetlands support.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...