Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study.

Animals play a central role in human livelihoods and welfare. Animal diseases have a great impact on the benefits humans derive from animals and can also pose a risk to human health. Better control of animal diseases generates wider societal benefits, including reducing the climate and ecological impacts of livestock and improving animal welfare. To better understand the scale of investment justified for the control and prevention of animal disease, the wide-ranging impacts of disease on animal production and health must be measured. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme is quantifying animal disease burden from the local to global levels. The GBADs programme includes country case studies for national- and local-level analysis. Ethiopia is the first case study country in which GBADs methods have been applied. GBADs'Ethiopia case study consists of three activity areas: i) stakeholder engagement; ii) livestock disease burden estimation, including data collection, analytics, evidence generation and communication; and iii) capacity building in animal health economics. At the start of the case study, various stakeholder communication platforms were used to familiarise stakeholders with GBADs and engage their support in various ways, including data access, and, through this engagement, to ensure the programme tools and outputs were relevant and useful to their needs. Existing data were retrieved from multiple sources and used to estimate disease burden. This process involved multiple steps, including estimation of biomass and economic value, the Animal Health Loss Envelope (farm-level disease burden), wider economic impacts and attribution of the disease burden to different levels of causes. This was carried out for major livestock species (cattle, sheep, goats and poultry) in Ethiopia. Capacity building on animal health economics was carried out for GBADs end users to increase competence in utilising animal health economic evidence, including GBADs outputs. This article documents experiences of the implementation of these activities in the GBADs Ethiopia case study.

Les animaux représentent une part substantielle des moyens de subsistance et contribuent de manière essentielle au bien-être humain. Les bénéfices que l'humanité peut retirer des animaux sont toutefois compromis par les maladies animales, qui font aussi peser un risque sur la santé publique. Les avantages sociétaux d'un meilleur contrôle des maladies animales dépassent la portée strictement sanitaire et recouvrent notamment l'atténuation de l'impact climatique et environnemental des animaux d'élevage et l'amélioration du bien-être animal. Pour mieux appréhender l'échelle des investissements requis pour contrôler et prévenir les maladies animales, il convient de mesurer les impacts très divers de ces maladies sur la production et la santé animales. Le programme " Impact mondial des maladies animales " (GBADs) procède actuellement à la quantification de la charge des maladies animales, du niveau local au niveau mondial. Il comprend aussi des études de cas conduites dans des pays choisis pour une analyse à l'échelle nationale, voire locale. L'Ethiopie est le premier pays à avoir fait l'objet d'une étude de cas nationale reprenant les méthodes du GBADs. L'étude comportait trois volets d'activités : i) la mobilisation des parties prenantes ; ii) l'estimation de la charge des maladies chez les animaux d'élevage, notamment la collecte de données, leur analyse, l'apport d'éléments probants et la communication ; et iii) le renforcement des capacités en économie de la santé animale. Au lancement de l'étude, plusieurs plateformes de communication professionnelles ont été utilisées pour mieux faire connaître le GBADs aux différents acteurs et solliciter leur soutien de diverses manières, en particulier en termes d'accès aux données, et pour s'assurer, grâce à cette mobilisation, que les outils et les résultats du programme étaient pertinents pour eux et répondaient à leurs besoins. Les données existantes ont été recueillies auprès de multiples sources et ont permis d'estimer la charge sanitaire. Ce processus comportait plusieurs étapes, dont l'estimation de la biomasse et de la valeur économique, la définition de l'enveloppe des pertes sanitaires animales (charge sanitaire à l'échelle des exploitations), l'appréciation des effets économiques au sens large et la répartition de la charge sanitaire en fonction des niveaux des causes attribuées. Les analyses portaient sur les principales espèces d'animaux d'élevage (bovins, ovins, caprins et volailles) en Ethiopie. Des activités de renforcement des capacités en économie de la santé animale ont été proposées aux utilisateurs finaux du GBADs afin de les former à l'utilisation des preuves économiques en santé animale. Les auteurs expliquent comment s'est déroulée la mise en oeuvre de ces activités lors de l'étude du GBADs conduite en Ethiopie.

Los animales desempeñan un papel fundamental en los medios de subsistencia y el bienestar humanos. En este sentido, las enfermedades animales tienen un gran impacto en los beneficios que los humanos obtienen de los animales y también pueden suponer un riesgo para la salud humana. Un mejor control de las enfermedades animales genera beneficios sociales más amplios, como la reducción del impacto climático y ecológico de la ganadería y la mejora del bienestar animal. Para comprender mejor la magnitud de la inversión justificada para el control y la prevención de las enfermedades animales, es preciso medir las amplias repercusiones de las enfermedades en la producción y la sanidad animal. El programa sobre el impacto global de las enfermedades animales (GBADs) cuantifica el impacto de las enfermedades animales desde el nivel local hasta el mundial. El programa GBADs incluye estudios de casos por países a fin de realizar un análisis a escala nacional y local. Etiopía es el primer país en el que se han aplicado los métodos del GBADs. El estudio de caso del GBADs en dicho país se divide en tres áreas de actividad: i) la participación de las partes interesadas; ii) la estimación del impacto de las enfermedades del ganado, incluida la recopilación de datos, el análisis, la generación de pruebas y la comunicación; y iii) el desarrollo de capacidades en el ámbito de la economía de la sanidad animal. Al inicio del estudio de caso, se utilizaron diversas plataformas de comunicación con las partes interesadas para familiarizarlas con el GBADs y recabar su apoyo a través de diversas vías, entre las que se incluía el acceso a los datos, y, mediante esta colaboración, garantizar que las herramientas y los resultados del programa fueran pertinentes y útiles para sus necesidades. Se obtuvieron datos de diversas fuentes que se utilizaron para estimar el impacto de las enfermedades. Este proceso implicó múltiples pasos, incluida la estimación de la biomasa y el valor económico, la cartera de pérdidas en sanidad animal (impacto de las enfermedades a nivel de explotación), los impactos económicos más amplios y la atribución del impacto de las enfermedades a diferentes categorías de causas. Esto se llevó a cabo para las principales especies ganaderas (bovinos, ovinos, caprinos y aves de corral) en Etiopía. Se realizaron actividades de capacitación en economía de la sanidad animal para los usuarios finales con el fin de aumentar su competencia en la utilización de los datos económicos sobre sanidad animal, incluidos los resultados del GBADs. Este artículo documenta las experiencias de la puesta en práctica de estas actividades en el estudio de caso del GBADs en Etiopía.

Zoonotic tuberculosis and brucellosis in Africa: neglected zoonoses or minor public-health issues? The outcomes of a multi-disciplinary workshop.

Late in 2007, veterinary, medical and anthropological professionals from Europe and Africa met in a 2-day workshop in Pretoria, South Africa, to evaluate the burden, surveillance and control of zoonotic tuberculosis and brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa. Keynote presentations reviewed the burden of these diseases on human and livestock health, the existing diagnostic tools, and the available control methods. These presentations were followed by group discussions and the formulation of recommendations. The presence of Mycobacterium bovis and Brucella spp. in livestock was considered to be a serious threat to public health, since livestock and animal products are the only source of such infections in human beings. The impact of these pathogens on human health appears to be relatively marginal, however, when compared with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections and drug resistance, HIV and malaria. Appropriate diagnostic tools are needed to improve the detection of M. bovis and Brucella spp. in humans. In livestock, the 'test-and-slaughter' approach and the pasteurization of milk, which have been used successfully in industrialized countries, might not be the optimal control tools in Africa. Control strategies should fit the needs and perceptions of local communities. Improved intersectoral and international collaboration in surveillance, diagnosis and control, and in the education of medical and veterinary personnel, are advocated.

Survey of tick infestation in small ruminants of Miesso district, West Harergie, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.

A survey was conducted to identify tick species and determine the prevalence of tick infestation in small ruminants of Miesso District, West Harergie Zone. Collection and identification of the ticks were undertaken from November 2007 to April 2008. All visible individual adult ticks were collected from the body of 328 goats and 40 sheep. The prevalence of tick infestation in goats and sheep was found to be 89.9% and 87.5%, respectively. In this study, ten species of ticks which grouped under four genera were identified. The most abundant species found in this study were Boophilus decoloratus (60%), Rhipicephalus pulchellus (25.1%), and Amblyomma gemma (11%). Hyalomma dromedarii was the minor species observed on goats. The difference in the prevalence of tick infestation between sheep and goats was not statistically significant (Chi( 2 ) = 0.22, p = 0.63) but found to be statistically significant between male and females (Chi( 2 ) = 9.8, p = 0.003). Attention should be given to the control and prevention of ticks, since they cause sever damage to the skins of small ruminants and thereby reduce the foreign exchange of the country; they also transmit some diseases which can cause sever loss to the productivity of these animals.

Risk factors for foot and mouth disease seroprevalence in indigenous cattle in Southern Ethiopia: the effect of production system.

A serological survey to investigate risk factors for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) occurrence was conducted between October 2007 and March 2008 in Southern Ethiopia. Antibodies against non-structural protein of FMD virus (using 3abc ELISA) were measured as indicator of exposure to the virus. The seroprevalence of FMD was 9.5% (95%CI = 7.7 - 11.3, n = 1020) and 48.1% (95% CI = 36.8 - 59.4%, n = 79), respectively at animal and herd levels. Within herd seropositivity was ranged from 6.7 to 46.7% with 18.6% (95%CI = 14.6 - 22.5%) risk of being seropositive for an animal in positive herds. The most important herd level risk factors identified were pastoral system (OR = 16.3, 95% CI = 2.0 -133.7) compared to sedentary, low altitude (OR = 7.5, 95% CI 1.4 -40.7) compared to high altitude, keeping cattle with small ruminants (OR = 5.1, 95% CI 1.0 -25.2) when compared to one species or alone. Seroprevalence was significantly higher (P <0.05) in South Omo than Sidama and Gamo Gofa areas. The odds of seropositivity were 2.8 and 2.3 times higher in the adult (>4 years) and maturing animals (3-4 years) compared to young age category (<3 years). Both multivariable logistic and negative binomial regressions depicted that production system was the major risk factor for FMD seropositivity. Consequently, higher prevalence of FMD in pastoral system where animals are an integral part of life has substantial livelihood and economic implications, which signifies the need for devising control measures.