A phase 1b study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer: an Academic Oncology GI Cancer Consortium study.

PURPOSE: Addition of either nab-paclitaxel or erlotinib to gemcitabine to treat advanced pancreatic cancer has demonstrated overall survival benefit. This study was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and safety of combining all three drugs and assess preliminary evidence of efficacy. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 1b study, patients with previously untreated, advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in 28-day cycles with intravenous gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, and once daily oral erlotinib. A standard "3 + 3" design was used. Dose level 1 (DL1) for gemcitabine (mg/m(2))/nab-paclitaxel (mg/m(2))/erlotinib (mg) was 1000/125/100, respectively, with de-escalation to DL-1 (1000/100/100), DL-2b (1000/75/100), and DL-3 (1000/75/75). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined by occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in ≤1 of six patients within the first cycle. Efficacy was assessed with CT scans performed at two-cycle intervals. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. DLTs occurred in two patients at DL1, three patients at DL-1, two patients at DL-2b, and one patient at DL-3. The MTD for the combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/erlotinib was DL-3 (1000/75/75). In analyses of efficacy among 14 evaluable patients, partial responses were observed in four of six patients at DL1, one of two patients at DL-2b, and two of six patients at DL-3. CONCLUSION: The addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is not tolerable at standard single-agent dosing of all drugs. However, significant clinical activity was noted, even at DL-3. Further study of the combination will need to incorporate reduced dosing.

Low-dose outpatient chemobiotherapy with temozolomide, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, interferon-alpha2b, and recombinant interleukin-2 for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose outpatient chemobiotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed unresectable measurable metastatic melanoma were enrolled onto an open-label, multicenter phase II study. The treatment regimen consisted of oral temozolomide followed by subcutaneous biotherapy with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-alfa, and recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (90%) had M1c disease, and 58% had three or more sites of metastasis. Four patients (13%), all with M1c disease, had a complete response, and four patients had a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months and the median overall survival was 13.1 months. Two patients (6%) developed CNS metastasis as the first site of disease progression, and 7 (23%) of 30 experienced CNS progression after receiving chemobiotherapy. A total of 112 cycles of therapy were administered. Toxicity occurred in 78% of the cycles and was grade 1 or 2 in the majority of cases and easily managed. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 3% of the cycles. CONCLUSION: This low-dose chemobiotherapy combination produces clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma, even in those with M1c disease, is well tolerated, and allows home dosing. It offers a reasonable alternative to high-dose regimens, such as high-dose biochemotherapy or rIL-2 requiring prolonged periods of hospitalization, or single agent outpatient regimens, such as dacarbazine, which is usually not effective in patients with M1c disease. Furthermore, it may protect against the development of brain metastases.

Maintenance biotherapy for metastatic melanoma with interleukin-2 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor improves survival for patients responding to induction concurrent biochemotherapy.

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase II study of a novel maintenance biotherapy regimen after induction biochemotherapy was conducted in patients with metastatic melanoma in efforts to maintain responses and improve survival. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-three patients with poor prognosis metastatic melanoma who achieved a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) to induction concurrent biochemotherapy were treated with chronic low-dose interleukin (IL)-2 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and intermittent pulses of intermediate/high-dose decrescendo IL-2 over a 12-month period. The outcome of these patients was compared with a control group of patients at our institution who were treated recently with induction biochemotherapy and achieved a PR or SD. RESULTS: Five patients (15%) achieved a complete response, and 4 patients (12%) maintained SD for at least 6 months on maintenance biotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 months and 18.5 months, respectively, compared with historical controls, which were PFS 5.9 months (P = 0.0015) and OS 9.3 months (P = 0.0004). Administration of maintenance biotherapy was a significant predictor of PFS (P = 0.0008) and OS (P = 0.0001) in multivariate and matched-pair analyses (P = 0.002). The maintenance biotherapy regimen was well tolerated with no dose-limiting acute or cumulative toxicities. CONCLUSION: In this single institution study, maintenance biotherapy with IL-2 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients achieving PR or SD to induction biochemotherapy improved PFS and OS compared with historical controls. A larger multicenter Phase II trial has been initiated in an effort to confirm these results.