ABSTRACT
The planning and subsequent treatment of inclined lesions is difficult when non-vertical or non-horizontal beams are to be employed. Rotations of the patient support assembly and the collimator further complicate the planning. The present work describes an empirical approach that is relatively simple (requires protractor and calculator). Frequently, plans must be generated in planes other then the central axis and a caution about the location of the "SAD" point will be discussed.
Subject(s)
Radiometry/methods , Radiotherapy/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
This study investigated dose to bone tissue in electron beam therapy. Measurements were made using films and thermoluminescent dosimeters in a polystyrene phantom containing bone inhomogeneity for 15-MeV, 12-MeV, and 9-MeV electron beams. An increase in dose of approximately 18%, 12%, and 11%, for the three electron energies respectively, relative to the dose in polystyrene, was found for bone material having an electron density (relative to water) of 1.73. Measurements were also made using films for 15- and 9-MeV electrons in a phantom with a mandibular bone and teeth. A dose enhancement in bone of approximately 10% and 7%, respectively, for the two energies was found in the phantom where the electron density of bone was about 1.60. These results suggest that injury to bone is possible in those clinical situations where high doses of electrons are used for therapy.
Subject(s)
Bone and Bones , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/methods , Electrons , Film Dosimetry , Humans , Mandible , Models, Anatomic , Radiotherapy Dosage , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , ToothABSTRACT
Accuracy of dose calculation for regular fields in off-central axis planes was investigated on a RAD-8 treatment planning computer for 4- and 10-MV x-ray beams produced by Varian Clinac -4 and Clinac -18 linear accelerators. These calculations, which are based on central axis depth dose and off-axis ratios in the principal planes, can be in error by as much as 25%-30% at locations well within the irradiated volume for the 4-MV x-ray beam. These large errors for the Clinac -4 beam result from the falloff in dose beyond the peak dose along a diagonal of a large field at distances greater than 14 cm from the central axis due to the lead flattening filter. The profile data stored in the computer along the principal planes cannot be used to calculate the dose accurately in such a situation. Computed doses for the 10-MV x-ray beam agreed with the measured doses within 4%-6% at all locations.