Bovine ischaemic teat necrosis: a further potential role for digital dermatitis treponemes.

A recent outbreak of ischaemic teat necrosis (ITN) on mainland UK has resulted in large economic losses for dairy farmers. Typical cases start as an area of dry, thickened and encrusted skin on the medial aspect of the base of the teat, where the teat joins the udder, often with a fetid odour. The erosion spreads down the teat, often causing intense irritation, which in turn leads to more severely affected animals removing the entire teat. Due to the severity of ITN and the substantial economic costs to the industry, analyses were undertaken to ascertain if an infectious agent might be involved in the pathology. The study has considered a role for digital dermatitis (DD) treponemes in the aetiopathogenesis of ITN because, as well as being the prime bacteria associated with infectious lameness, they have been associated with a number of emerging skin diseases of cattle, including udder lesions. A high association between presence of DD-associated treponemes and incidence of ITN (19/22), compared with absence in the control population is reported. Furthermore, sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of treponeme isolates supports the hypothesis that the identified treponemes are similar or identical to those isolated from classical foot DD lesions in cattle (and sheep). Further studies are required to allow effective targeted prevention measures and/or treatments to be developed.

Effect of a 15-minute infusion of DDAVP on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of REVASC during a four-hour intravenous infusion in healthy male volunteers.

Plasma pharmacokinetics, effect on coagulation parameters, and safety and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of REVASC before, during and after a DDAVP infusion were investigated. Twelve healthy volunteers were given an intravenous bolus dose followed by a constant rate four-hour infusion of REVASC. Fifteen-minute infusions of 0.9% saline and DDAVP were started two and three hours respectively after the start of the REVASC infusion. Plasma REVASC concentrations were not affected by either the saline or DDAVP infusion. REVASC infusion produced an increase in APTT which plateaued between 0.5 and 3 hours. After the DDAVP infusion there was a tendency towards a new lower plateau whilst the REVASC infusion continued. There were no serious adverse events or bleeding episodes throughout the study. In conclusion, the co-administration of intravenous DDAVP has no effect on the plasma pharmacokinetics of REVASC and partially reverses the REVASC-induced increase in APTT. This may represent a role for DDAVP in the partial reversal of anticoagulation induced by REVASC.