[Clinicopathological Evaluation of Preoperative Chemotherapy Containing S-1 as a Treatment for Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma during Waiting Time for Surgery].

BACKGROUND: In our department, patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC)received preoperative chemotherapy containing S-1 to prevent the growth and dissemination of tumors during the waiting time before definitive surgery. We retrospectively evaluated the usefulness of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and five patients comprising stages T1(26), T2(64), T3(7), and T4(8 cases)were enrolled in this study from July 2001 to June 2013. In principle, patients were administered S-1(80mg/m / 2/day, days 1-14)and followed by a drug holiday(days 15-21), continuing until 1 week before surgery. RESULTS: The median administration period was 14 days(256 days). Ninety-eight patients underwent definitive surgery, but 7 patients who revealed clinical CR underwent only biopsy and showed histological CR. The histological responses of all patients were CR(24), PR(22), and NC(59), and the response rate was 43.8%. Almost all adverse effects were Grade 1 or 2, except 1 case of neutropenia(Grade 3)and 1 case of urticaria(Grade 3). The 5-year overall survival rates were 86.7% in all cases, 95.3% in CR/PR cases, and 79.7% in NC cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative S-1 administration during the waiting time was a safe and very effective method and was considered beneficial for patients with OSCC.

The incidence of endophthalmitis or macular involvement and the necessity of a routine ophthalmic examination in patients with candidemia.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ocular candidiasis (OC) in patients with candidemia varies across different reports, and the issue of whether routine ophthalmoscopy improves outcomes has been raised. This study investigated the incidence of OC and evaluate whether the extent of OC impacts the clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included non-neutropenic patients with candidemia who underwent treatment at one of 15 medical centers between 2010 and 2016. Chorioretinitis without other possible causes for the ocular lesions and endophthalmitis was classified as a probable OC. If signs of chorioretinitis were observed in patients with a systemic disease that causes similar ocular lesions, they were classified as a possible OC. RESULTS: In total, 781 of 1089 patients with candidemia underwent an ophthalmic examination. The prevalence of OC was 19.5%. The time from the collection of a positive blood culture to the initial ophthalmic examination was 5.0 ± 3.9 days in patients with OC. The leading isolate was Candida albicans (77.9%). Possible OC was associated with unsuccessful treatments (resolution of ocular findings) (odds ratio: 0.354, 95% confidence interval: 0.141-0.887), indicating an overdiagnosis in patients with a possible OC. If these patients were excluded, the incidence fell to 12.8%. Endophthalmitis and/or macular involvement, both of which require aggressive therapy, were detected in 43.1% of patients; a significantly higher incidence of visual symptoms was observed in these patients. CONCLUSION: Even when early routine ophthalmic examinations were performed, a high incidence of advanced ocular lesions was observed. These results suggest that routine ophthalmic examinations are still warranted in patients with candidemia.