Factors affecting intent to perpetrate violence against nurses: Theory of Planned Behavior approach.

BACKGROUND: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) has been found to predict target behaviors. The literature examining this model lacks attention to violence toward nurses. PURPOSE: To explore the association between the public's exposure to violence and intention to employ violence toward nurses, under the TPB framework. METHODS: A cross-sectional study (705 participants) employed a self-report questionnaire. Path analysis assessed TPB variables' mediation between prior exposure to violence and violent intent toward nurses. DISCUSSION: The TPB variables, that is attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control, mediated only the association between exposure to physical violence and intention to act violently. Subjective norms were the strongest mediator. The explained variance was 31%. CONCLUSION: When addressing violence against nurses, policymakers must consider attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control among patients and their attendants. Violence directed at nurses and health care workers reflects societal violence and the "upstream approaches" needed to mitigate violence in health care settings.

Sophomore nursing students' perception of their Professional Behavior toward Rehabilitation patients: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation is considered one of the elements of universal health coverage, emphasizing its importance for every person in need throughout the life course. Nurses play a pivotal role in the rehabilitation team as they possess the competencies to help individuals manage health problems and maximize potential well-being. Yet, little is known regarding knowledge of this subject among nursing students, as well as regarding their attitudes, thoughts, and professional behavior. This study aimed to explore: (a) Sophomore students' attitudes, feelings, thoughts, and professional behavior toward rehabilitation patients; and (b) Differences in the research variables as affected by students' previous exposure to rehabilitation patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey design among sophomore nursing students. A questionnaire was distributed through a commercial internet survey provider (Qualtrics.com) before the beginning of a mandatory course on "nursing rehabilitation", introduced for the first time in 2022 in all Israeli universities. Students were divided into three groups according to their previous exposure to rehabilitation patients: no professional or personal previous exposure to rehabilitation patients; previous professional or personal exposure to rehabilitation patients; and previous exposure to rehabilitation patients both in one's professional and personal life. The study adhered to the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 122 participants. Significant differences were found between the groups by their previous exposure to rehabilitation patients. Participants with no previous exposure to rehabilitation patients were found to have lower self-perceived capability to care for rehabilitation patients and more negative professional behavior toward rehabilitation patients and their families compared to the other two groups (H = 22.06, p = 0.006, H = 23.86, p = 0.03, respectively). No other statistical differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize the importance of exposing students to the field of nursing rehabilitation and to the care of rehabilitation patients. Exposure to nursing rehabilitation specifically during one's studies, through theoretical learning and clinical experience, can promote positive attitudes, professional values, and positive professional behavior toward these patients and their families.

The role of sense of coherence in workplace violence directed at nurses in the shadow of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: To explore (a) the associations between sense of coherence (SOC), previous exposure to COVID-19, and the intention to act violently towards nurses, and (b) the role of SOC and sociodemographic variables as risk or protective factors involved in the intention to act violently. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with a convenience sample. METHODS: A structured self-report questionnaire was distributed from February to March 2022. The questionnaire included socioeconomic variables, previous exposure to COVID-19, and a validated questionnaire on SOC. Three vignettes (online shaming, verbal and physical violence) describing nurse-patient communication conflicts were presented to participants. A multinomial logistic regression was conducted to explore the associations with acting violently by comparing three options of no/sometimes/high intention to act violently. The study adhered to STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 808 adults. SOC and religiosity were revealed as protective factors in the three vignettes. Verbal violent behaviour was found to be a risk factor for online and physical violent behaviour intention. Previous exposure to COVID-19, non-academic education, and ethnicity were found to be risk factors for the intention to behave violently toward nurses. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that training nurses in practical SOC dimensions (enhancing comprehensible, manageable and meaningful treatment processes) may reduce patients' lack of understanding and frustration and, in turn, reduce the tendency to behave violently. IMPACT: This study focused on SOC as a variable that may affect the intention to act violently towards nurses. The results reveal that SOC may be a protective factor, where people with higher SOC will have less intention to behave violently towards nurses. The results can provide an insight for nurses, nurse leaders and policymakers, towards supplying coherent and cultural competency treatment processes for patients and assisting nurses in dealing with stressful situations during normal routines and pandemics. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The questionnaire was distributed among the general public by master's degree nursing students. The students distributed the questionnaires among their friends and acquaintances using a snowball-sampling approach.

Perceptions of children with cancer and their parents regarding illness: A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The current study aims to understand inter-generational differences and similarities in the perception of illness and the available resources employed by children with cancer and their parents. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive research design was utilized, including face-to-face interviews with 108 parent-child dyads where the children had been diagnosed with cancer, by means of a semi-structured questionnaire. The participants were recruited from two pediatric hematology-oncology wards in two different hospitals in Israel. The data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis. Debriefing and inter-rater reliability methods were utilized. FINDINGS: Similarities were found between the coping of children and parents with the illness. Children with cancer and their parents can find bright sides and support for coping, such as different perspectives on life, faith, positive thoughts, and family assistance. Most of the differences between the perceptions of children and parents relate to the difficulties encountered. While parents are mainly concerned about the long-term impact, children contend with ordeals involving the here-and-now. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and children demonstrate a dual process in their challenging journey. Positive and facilitating factors are intertwined with the aggravating aspects, which exist side by side. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nursing staff should advise children and their parents to attain and use external and internal sources of support found in this study to help them deal with cancer.

Intervention training of urology healthcare staff to counsel acute care inpatients on smoking cessation: An evaluation study.

AIM: To evaluate the differences, following intervention training, in the knowledge, attitudes, role perception, self-capacity and intention of urology staff to counsel inpatients on smoking cessation. DESIGN: A descriptive evaluation study of intervention training in counselling on smoking cessation. The study was designed following guidance by the Medical Research Council. METHODS: The evaluation was based on a closed-end questionnaire with four time-point measurements from May 2018-December 2019 (N = 29 at each time-point). A repeated measure within-subjects ANOVA was conducted to explore the variance in participants' attitudes, role perception, self-capacity and intention to counsel patients regarding smoking cessation. Eta squared and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to interpret the results. RESULTS: No change was observed in the research variables after theoretical science-based learning of the smoking hazards and the benefits of cessation. A statistically significant difference was found following procedural knowledge based on training, practical experience and skill development.

Social determinants and adherence to recommended COVID-19 vaccination among the Arab ethnic minority: A syndemics framework.

Background: Since the mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was launched in Israel, the Arab ethnicity minority had lower vaccine uptake. The syndemics theory suggests a closely interrelated complex of health and social crises among vulnerable societies results in an increased disease burden or in more adverse health conditions. Syndemics may explain the health disparities between different people or communities. Likewise, acculturation was found to be associated with different health outcomes among minority populations. The purpose of the study is to explore the association between syndemic construct, acculturation style, and adherence to recommended COVID-19 vaccination among the Arab ethnicity in Israel. Methods: A cross-sectional study among 305 participants who completed a self-report questionnaire. Syndemic construct (syndemics score and syndemics severity) was calculated from the participants' health behavior index, self-rated health status, and adherence to flu vaccination. Four acculturation strategies were defined according to Barry's acculturation model: assimilation, integration, separation, and marginalization style. Linear regression (stepwise method) was conducted to determine the explanatory factors for COVID-19 vaccine adherence. Results: Assimilation and separation acculturation styles and syndemics severity were significantly associated with higher adherence to the recommended COVID-19 vaccination (B = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.34-1.98; B = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.10-0.80; B = 0.18, 95%CI = 0.09-0.28; respectively). The explained variance of the model (R 2) was 19.9%. Conclusion: Syndemics severity, assimilation and separation acculturation styles were associated with higher adherence to recommended COVID-19 vaccination in the Israeli Arab minority population. Syndemics score was not associated with recommended COVID-19 vaccination. To encourage COVID-19 vaccination among minority communities, campaigns should be tailored to the social determinants in a sensitive and individualized manner.

Reducing health disparities: Adherence to referrals for further diagnosis among asylum seeking children.

OBJECTIVE: Asylum-seeking children are most vulnerable to health problems and non-utilization of health amenities. The aim of the study was to compare adherence with referrals for further diagnostic tests among asylum-seeking children and native Israeli children. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SAMPLE: The study was conducted among 3508 children born in 2016-2017, with two randomized sample groups: Israeli children (n = 243) and asylum-seeking children (n = 271). Data were retrieved from the children's medical files. MEASUREMENTS: Referrals for further diagnostic tests were defined as written referrals by a public health nurse or pediatrician. Data collected included the child's and mother's details, as well as data on referrals. A multiple logistic regression test was performed to detect risk variables for non-adherence to referrals. RESULTS: No differences were found between the groups regarding adherence to referrals for further diagnosis. Having medical insurance did not explain adherence to referrals. Asylum-seeking children have more need for further follow-up than do Israeli children. CONCLUSION: Asylum-seeking children and Israeli children respond similarly to the preventive health services offered with equal accessibility. Public health nurses have an essential role in encouraging adherence to screening tests and to referrals for further diagnostic tests and in mitigating health disparities among asylum-seeking children.

The Role of Science-Based Knowledge on the SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Reducing COVID-19-Induced Anxiety among Nurses.

The COVID-19 infection has generated not only a risk of morbidity and mortality but also resulted in an enormous psychological impact on healthcare providers and the general public. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety and identify the role of protective factors. A two-part cross-sectional study was conducted, by means of an online questionnaire. Part 1 investigated 562 registered nurses, nursing students, and the general public. Participants were assessed for anxiety symptoms with the State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory. A one-way ANCOVA analysis revealed that nurses had the highest level of anxiety compared to the general public and students, with 26% of them reporting severe anxiety. To identify how anxiety can be mitigated, the Part 2 study was focused on registered nurses from Part 1. Multiple regression revealed that a higher level of science-based knowledge of COVID-19 and professional experience were associated with a lower level of anxiety among nurses. The findings suggest that nurses are a vulnerable population prone to anxiety symptoms resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Having a deeper science-based understanding of COVID-19 may protect nurses from anxiety. This study underlines the importance of deep evidence-based knowledge for health providers, which may be generalized to a possible future emergency disaster.

Parents' Adherence to Childhood Screening Tests and Referrals: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Randomized Sampling.

Routine timely examinations of well-child health are important for achieving children's good health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is evidence of low compliance with well-child visit recommendations. The aim of the study was to examine potential factors associated with parents' nonadherence to routine childhood screening tests and their acting on further referrals following unusual findings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 14,348 children born in 2016-2017 and registered at mother-child health clinics in a large city in Israel. A sample of 844 children was randomly selected. Screening tests at the age of two months and nine months were examined. A multiple logistic regression examined potential factors associated with nonadherence to screening tests and to further referral for evaluation. Lower adherence to screening tests was found among parents of nine-month-old children, but adherence was higher for nurses' screening tests than for those of physicians. Children born in a complex delivery process, older mothers with a higher number of children, and Israeli citizens were at risk of not undergoing screening tests. Fewer children in the family and initial physician's findings were the only explanation for acting to referrals. In order to promote children's health outcomes and public health, health policymakers should conduct campaigns to convince parents of the importance of screening tests and of adherence to referrals with the aim of ensuring their children's wellbeing throughout the life cycle.

The public's mixed emotional responses to violence directed at nurses: A mixed methods study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To understand whether exposure to an incident of violence directed at nurses, evoke among the public a sense of identification with the victim or with the perpetrator. BACKGROUND: Worldwide, evidence regarding workplace violence (WPV) in healthcare systems, explored the characteristics of the perpetrator, the healthcare settings and staff. Nevertheless, no studies examine the emotions of the public towards WPV in the healthcare systems. DESIGN: A convergent mixed method parallel design. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was distributed among 925 adults. Two scenarios were presented, with verbal and physical violence towards nurses. The participants rated how intensely they felt positive and negative emotions regarding the nurse and the perpetrator (quantitative stage). Sixty participants were also interviewed concerning their emotions regarding violence committed towards nurses (qualitative stage). Paired samples t-test were used to compare the emotions that were aroused regarding the perpetrator and the nurse. The effect size and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were calculated. Constant comparative analysis method was used to analyzed the qualitative data. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies and the COREQ guidelines for qualitative studies were used for reporting. RESULTS: Positive emotions were significantly higher towards the nurse than the perpetrator. Nevertheless, there were both positive and negative emotions towards the perpetrator and the nurse. The qualitative findings yielded two themes: (1) Mixed emotions towards the perpetrator, and (2) Mixed emotions towards the nurse. CONCLUSIONS: The public may emotionally identify with both the nurse and the perpetrator while positive and negative emotions are intertwined. Likewise, positive emotions are more intensely felt for the victims in both verbally and physically violent scenarios. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: These complemented findings highlight the need for campaigns promoting positive emotions toward healthcare professionals in an attempt to reduce and eliminate WPV in healthcare.

Nurses as 'second victims' to their patients' suicidal attempts: A mixed-method study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To understand the effects of patients' suicidal attempts and events on nurses' second victim symptoms and to explore the association between these experiences and nurse absenteeism and turnover. BACKGROUND: The term 'second victim' is when a healthcare professional expresses psychological symptom following adverse patient event. This has been previously shown to be associated with absenteeism and higher staff turnover. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study with a sequential exploratory approach. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used for nurses to relate their experiences of their patients' suicidal attempts. A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in 150 nurses who worked in internal departments. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool was used to substantiate and measure second victim related distress of nurses who treated suicidal patients. The qualitative data were analysed by a constant comparative analysis method. The analytic analysis of the quantitative study included Pearson's correlations and hierarchical linear regression model to assess the explanatory variables to absenteeism and staff turnover. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies and the COREQ guidelines for qualitative studies. RESULTS: The qualitative part identified three themes and nine sub-themes, including the new variable 'sense of being alone'. The quantitative part of the study found that nurses expressed a medium level of second victim related distress. After controlling for demographic variables, second victim distress and the sense of being alone following patients' suicidal events may explain nurse absenteeism and turnover. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses who experience suicidal attempts of their patients react as second victims. These symptoms lead to nurse absenteeism and turnover. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses who experience suicidal attempts of their patients need treatment and support as second victims, the same as in any other medical adverse event. The nursing leadership should emotionally support these nurses and prevent consequential staff organisational problems.

Differences in mental health and health-related quality of life between the Israeli and Italian population during a COVID-19 quarantine.

PURPOSE: Severe restrictions related to COVID-19 were implemented almost simultaneously in Italy and Israel in early March 2020, although the epidemic situation in both countries was significantly different. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine how and to what extent the severe restrictions affected the mental health and health-related quality of life of non-infected people, in a comparison between Israel and Italy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the first week of May 2020 among 510 Israeli and 505 Italian participants. Anxiety and depression levels were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), and the short form-8 health survey (SF-8) questionnaire measured health-related quality of life. Linear hierarchic regression forced steps analysis was performed to measure the unique contribution of each variable to predicting health-related quality of life. RESULTS: After adjusting for socioeconomic variables, the results showed a significantly higher anxiety level and lower health-related quality of life in the Italian participants. The anxiety and depression variables predicted lower health-related quality of life. Physical activity was found to be a protective factor. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that early monitoring of anxiety and depression in situations such as quarantine may detect the risk for decline in health-related quality of life. Establishment of professional interventions is needed in order to prevent the negative health consequences of the pandemic-related policy.

It Takes Two to Tango: Public Attitudes Toward Prevention of Workplace Violence Against Health Care Staff: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Workplace violence (WPV) directed toward health care staff by patients and their relatives has become one of the major problems faced by health care systems around the world. Incidences of WPV have increased over the past decade, crossing borders and cultures and creating a worrisome global phenomenon. To date, most of the research has examined health care workers' perceptions of strategies that might prevent violence. Although the public, as prospective patients, has a central role in this state of affairs, little is known about public attitudes to prevention of violence in health care settings. In light of this, the current mixed-methods study aimed to explore public attitudes toward appropriate preventive and punitive measures that should be employed to diminish the occurrence of WPV incidents in health care settings. Five hundred sixty Jewish Israeli individuals participated in the study. Quantitative findings indicate the public's overall agreement and positive attitudes toward preventive and punitive measures aimed at reducing WPV against health care staff. Qualitative findings revealed two main themes: "focusing on the staff" by improving their work conditions, training them to deal with violence, and providing a sense of security, as well as "focusing on the public" by teaching tolerance, raising awareness of zero tolerance to violence, and punitive measures. The Israeli public believes that to deal with the problem of violence in the health care system, it is necessary to act simultaneously on two levels: health staff and the health care system, and the general public. In view of these findings, we recommend that policy makers address this issue by adopting preventive measures, such as increasing the number of health care personnel, workshops for the staff on dealing with violence, campaigns against violence in health care settings, and enforcing appropriate punitive measures against attackers.

The effect of evidence-based practice perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on nursing students' future implementation of evidence-based practice.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing is an important tool for promoting quality care and improving patient outcomes. Global evidence suggests that the rate of EBP implementation among nurses and nursing students is low. The effects of EBP perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on nursing students' future implementation of EBP have not been fully explored. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of EBP perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on future implementation of EBP among pre-registration nursing students. METHOD: A cross-sectional study used a self-administered structured questionnaire and analyzed data from 148 pre-registration nursing students at a university in central Israel. A hierarchical forced steps regression analysis was conducted to predict future implementation of EBP. RESULTS: Information literacy self-efficacy, EBP perception, and intrinsic academic motivation to experience stimulation, may predict EBP future implementation. The model explained 46.3% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The results indicate the importance of information literacy skills and positive attitudes to EBP, as well as of intrinsic academic motivation, for enhancing future implementation of EBP among nursing students.

Association Between Witnessing and Justifying Workplace Violence Towards Nurses in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence perpetrated by patients and their families towards nurses has become a global problem. PURPOSE: The present study explores associations between individuals' having witnessed violent incidents in the past and holding attitudes justifying violence in the present, and their intention to behave violently in a nurse-patient interaction at a healthcare facility. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study sampled 1,350 participants from among the general public in Israel. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire measured attitudes regarding violence towards nurses and confronted the participants with two vignettes eliciting verbal and physical violence towards nurses. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to explore the association between attitudes and intention to act violently. A mediation analysis (using the PROCESS macro) was conducted to explore the mediation factors. RESULTS: Over half of the participants witnessed an incident of verbal violence in health care and substantially fewer witnessed a physically violent event (51.5% and 16.1%, respectively). An attitude of highly justifying violence was found to be directly associated with the intention to act verbally and physically violent. Past witnessing of verbal or physical violence in healthcare settings had an indirect association through an attitude that justifies violence, which served as a mediating factor for the intention to act verbally and physically violent in a situation presented via the vignettes. CONCLUSIONS: Witnessing a violent event in healthcare systems has social consequences that may cause normalization of violence and lead to the intention to use verbal or even physical violence towards nurses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurses should be encouraged to report incidents of violence, while healthcare and judicial systems must address this issue seriously. It is recommended that systems alerting for risk indicators be applied, to identify patients with a potential for violence in healthcare facilities. Healthcare policymakers and workers must act to promote an environment of zero tolerance for violence in order to minimize such events. In order to prevent violence towards healthcare staff, a holistic multisystem approach should be implemented, involving a focus by sociocultural elements on social values and structures, as violence in healthcare reflects violence in society at large.

Knowledge and information credibility evaluation strategies regarding COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has not only caused significant challenges for health systems worldwide, but also fueled a surge in misinformation. Nurses as frontline health care providers should be equipped with the most accurate information on COVID-19. PURPOSE: This study examines nurses' knowledge and strategies of information credibility sourcing. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey among nurses and laypersons with no health care background. The questionnaire dealt with knowledge and ability assess credibility of COVID-19 information. FINDINGS: Nurses' knowledge of COVID-19 preventative behaviors was significantly higher than that of laypersons; however, there was no difference in science-based knowledge of COVID-19. In contrast to laypersons, nurses in this study were better able to discern the credibility of health-related information about COVID-19 than laypersons. Yet they rarely used scientific criteria in evaluating conflicting information. DISCUSSION: Given the importance of assessing the credibility of information, both information literacy skills and science-based knowledge about COVID-19 should be offered.

Different Reasons for Not Completing Routine Vaccinations Among Jewish and Arab Children in Israel.

Minority communities are at high risk for low childhood vaccination coverage rates. This paper compared the rate of children not fully vaccinated and the reasons for that between Jewish (majority) and Arab (minority) children in Israel. This cross-sectional study screened the medical files of 14,232 children (12,360 Jewish and 1872 Arab), registered at Mother-Child Health Clinics in two large geographical area, to identify children who did not complete the last dose of hepatitis B and DTaP or first dose of MMR vaccines. We compared the reasons for not completing the vaccine schedule registered by the nurses between Jewish and Arab children. We identified 1052 children who did not complete at least one of the vaccines: 975 Jewish children and 77 Arab children. Four causal categories were identified: medical reasons, parental decision, parental behaviour, and organizational reasons. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the reasons for not completing the vaccination protocol. Arab children compared to Jewish children were more likely not to complete the vaccination protocol due to medical reasons (OR 3.81, CI 1.53-9.49) and less likely due to the reason parental decision (OR 0.35, CI 0.13-0.96). Therefore, patterns of reasons for not completing vaccinations vary, depending on population. Interventions to reduce the number of children not fully vaccinated should be tailored to the specific population.

A path analysis model suggesting the association between health locus of control and compliance with childhood vaccinations.

Despite vaccines benefits, parent's vaccine hesitancy is growing. Health locus of control (HLOC) may affect decision making regarding child vaccinations. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between parents' HLOC and compliance with routine childhood immunization programs. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 731 parents of children aged 3-4 years. Internal HLOC, powerful others and chance HLOC (dimensions of external HLOC), reliability of information sources, and attitudes towards vaccines were measured. Path analysis was conducted to explore direct and indirect associations between HLOC and vaccination's compliance. The results show that High powerful others HLOC has a direct association with vaccination compliance (ß = 0.23, p < 0.001). High internal and chance HLOC have indirect associations through parents' attitudes regarding vaccines. Perceived reliability of information sources was associated with not complying with vaccines (ß = -0.07, p < 0.05). For conclusions, Interaction between internal and external HLOC may explain vaccination compliance. Decreasing levels of chance HLOC and increasing powerful others HLOC may increase levels of compliance with childhood vaccinations.

Growth, developmental achievements and vaccines timeliness of undocumented migrant children from Eritrea compared with Israelis.

INTRODUCTION: Israel has absorbed >40,000 Eritrean undocumented migrants since 2007, while the majority live in the southern neighborhoods of Tel-Aviv. As non-citizens and citizens infants in Israel receive free preventive treatment at the mother and child health clinics (MCHC), this study aimed to compare development and growth achievements between children of Eritrean mothers (CE) to children of Israeli mothers (CI), and assess their compliance to routine follow-up and vaccination-timeliness. METHODS: This cohort study included all Israeli-born CE between 2009 and 2011, compared with a random sample of CI and treated at the same MCHC and followed-up to the age of 30-months. Dependent outcomes included anthropometric measurements, developmental achievements and adherence to immunization schedule. RESULTS: Of all 271 CE who were compared with 293 CI, no statistically significant differences were found in birth anthropometric measurements. Yet, CE had increased weight and length than CI after reaching one year of age (p<0.05). CE were more likely to fail in tests assessing fine-motor skills, linguistic and socio-emotional domains than CI, while no statistical difference was found in gross-motor achievements. At the end of follow-up, 203 (74.9%) of the CE and 271 (74.1%) of the CI completed the vaccination schedule, p = 0.9. CONCLUSION: CE had greater anthropometric measurements than CI after one year of age, and showed higher impairments in fine motor, linguistic and socio-emotional domains. Adherence to vaccination was similar. The inequalities in child health should be responded in the MCTC, and Eritrean mothers should be trained with the current recommendations for child well-being.

[SOCIAL-ECONOMIC-DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES IN REASONS NOT TO COMPLY IN TIME WITH ROUTINE CHILDHOOD VACCINATIONS].

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increase in parents who do not comply with recommended routine vaccines. The vaccination coverage rates in Israel are known, but the reasons for not completing immunizations are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of failure to complete the routine vaccinations in time and the reasons among different population groups. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control cohort study, among children born in 2009. A total of 14,232 medical records of children who received services at Mother-Child Health Clinics were checked. The children who received all three core vaccines (3th Hepatitis B, 4th DTaP and MMR vaccines) were considered fully compliant and those missing at least one vaccination were considered non-compliant. Six reasons for not complying were identified: medical reasons, parental refusal to vaccinate, requests for a deferred schedule of vaccinations, parental behavior, organizational reasons and others. The differences between groups were analyzed by univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: In this study, 7.4% of children, were not fully compliant with all three core vaccines within two years. The main reasons in the Jewish population were: refusal and requests for variation in scheduling (44.3%) and in the Arabic population: parental behavior (40.8%). The risk for not completing the vaccinations was higher in children of Jewish mothers, residence in the Hadera sub-district, parents who had an academic education and older parents. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between Arab and Jewish populations in the reasons for not complying in time with childhood vaccinations. In order to obtain herd immunity in the Israeli population, we need to tailor interventions suitable for each population group according to their characteristics.