A practical method for real-time detection of pedicle wall breaching during funneling.

BACKGROUND: A reliable, real-time method for the detection of pedicle wall breaching during funnelling in spine deformity surgery could be accessible to any surgeon assisted with neuromonitoring. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients (1066 pedicles), who were submitted to spinal deformity surgery from December 2013 to July 2015 were included in the study group. A control group of 13 consecutive patients (226 pedicles) with spinal deformity surgery were operated on from January to December 2013 and were excluded from finder stimulation. In the study cohort, continuous stimulation during funnelling was delivered via a finder and subsequently a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) threshold was determined. Following funnelling, manual inspection of the pedicular internal walls was performed. The CMAP thresholds were compared with the results of palpation to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the technique for detecting pedicular breaching. To cover common ranges of damage, the medial and lateral breaches were compared and the concave-apical breaches compared to the non-apical or convex-apical breaches. In addition, a pedicle screw test was estimated for all patients. RESULTS: ROC analysis showed 9 mA cut-off to have a sensitivity of 88.0% and a specificity of 89.5% for predicting pedicular breaching, with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001). Using 9 mA threshold as an alert criterion, funnelling at the concave-apical pedicles showed significantly more true and false positive alerts and fewer true negative alerts when compared with the non-apical and convex-apical pedicles (P < 0.001). Medial breaches had significantly lower stimulation thresholds than lateral breaches (P < 0.001). Thresholds of screw-testing were significantly higher for study than for control-patients (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Finder stimulation has a considerably higher sensitivity and specificity for prediction of pedicular breaching, most prominent for medial breaches. Screw-testing displayed significantly better results in patients undergoing the finder stimulation technique, as compared with the control group. The main advantages of our method are its high safety level and low cost, which may be critical in less affluent countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

C5 Palsy Following Cervical Spine Decompression.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spinal surgery is considered safe and effective. One of the few specific complications of this procedure is C5 nerve root palsy. Expressed primarily by deltoid muscle and biceps brachii weakness, it is rare and has been related to nerve root traction or to ischemic spinal cord damage. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical and epidemiological traits of C5 palsy. To determine whether C5 palsy occurs predominantly in one specific surgical approach compared to others. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at our medical center during a consecutive 8-year period was conducted. The patient data were analyzed for demographics, diagnosis, and surgery type and approach, as well as for complications, with emphasis on the C5 nerve root palsy. RESULTS: The study group was comprised of 124 patients. Seven (5.6%) developed a C5 palsy following surgery. Interventions were either by anterior, by posterior or by a combined approach. Seven patients developed this complication. All of whom had myelopathy and were older males. A combined anteroposterior (5 patients) and posterior access (2 patients) were the only approaches that were associated with the C5 palsy. None of the patients who were operated via an anterior approach did develop this sequel. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of the C5 root palsy in our cohort reached 5.6%. Interventions performed through a combined anterior-posterior access in older myelopathic males, may carry the highest risk for this complication.

The Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Postoperative Hardware-Related Spinal Infections.

BACKGROUND: Implant-related spinal infections are a surgical complication associated with high morbidity. Due to infection, hardware removal may be necessary, which could lead to pseudarthrosis and the loss of stability and alignment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in the workup of patients with suspected implant-related infections of the spine and to assess the clinical impact of PET/CT results on the management of these infections. METHODS: The study included nine consecutive patients with a history of spinal surgery who underwent PET/CT for evaluation of suspected spinal implant related infection. All imaging studies were performed between January 2011 and December 2013. All 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed on an 8 slice PET/CT following an 18F-FDG injection. Images were scored both visually and semi-quantitatively by a radiology expert. Results were compared to additional imaging studies when available, which were correlated to clinical and bacteriological findings allowing calculation of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. RESULTS: Among the patients, five experienced hardware-related spinal infection. 18F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity was 80%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 88.9%. One scan produced a false negative; however, a second PET/CT scan revealed an infection. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT was found to be valuable for the diagnosis of postoperative hardware-related spinal infection, especially when other imaging modalities were uninformative or inconclusive. As such, PET/CT could be useful for management of infection treatment.

The Discrepancy between Subjective and Objective Measures of Convergence Insufficiency in Whiplash-Associated Disorder versus Control Participants.

PURPOSE: Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) are a pandemic associated with human suffering and a burden to national economies. Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) after MVAs are associated commonly with disability claims, many of which are related to vision. Convergence insufficiency (CI) leads to visual disability associated with symptoms of ocular discomfort. We examined the incidence of symptoms and findings consistent with CI in a cohort of patients after MVA-related WAD compared with age-matched control participants. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with WAD after MVA were recruited from the Orthopedic Emergency Department between July 2014 and March 2017. Control participants were recruited among hospital personnel and relatives of WAD patients. METHODS: The Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) questionnaire was completed by each participant, followed by a detailed visual examination including measurements of distance and near best-corrected Snellen visual acuity, distance and near cover test, Randot stereopsis, Maddox distance and Maddox-Thorington near heterophoria, near point of convergence, base-out step fusional reserves, and amplitude of accommodation using the push-away method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The CISS score and binocular measure findings of CI were recorded and analyzed using Student's t test, the chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression adjusted for age and gender. RESULTS: A pathologic CISS score of 16 or more occurred in 26 of 57 WAD patients (45.6%) compared with 6 of 39 control participants (15.4%; P = 0.002). Absolute CISS score was higher in the WAD group compared with the control group (15.3±10.0 vs. 7.7±7.7; P < 0.001). Findings consistent with CI occurred in 7.0% of WAD patients and 7.7% of control participants (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Visual symptoms suggestive of CI were reported more frequently among WAD patients compared with control participants, yet the incidence of examination findings indicating weakness of convergence was not increased. The discrepancy between subjective and objective measures of CI in WAD patients versus control participants stresses the importance of training healthcare personnel to assess disability using objective, validated standards of examination.