A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of intratracheal and intravenous lignocaine on airway and hemodynamic response during emergence and extubation following general anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: Intratracheal (IT) and intravenous (IV) lignocaine suppress airway reflex and hemodynamic response during extubation, but studies regarding this are sparse. The primary aim was to compare the effect of IT and IV lignocaine on attenuation of airway reflex to endotracheal extubation and the secondary aim was to compare the hemodynamic responses to extubation, using lignocaine by the two different routes. METHODS: Seventy-five female patients with comparable age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status undergoing carcinoma breast surgery were randomized into three groups. Group A received 2% lignocaine 3 mg/kg intratracheally 5 min and Group B received 2% lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg intravenously 3 min before extubation. Group C was control group. The airway and hemodynamic responses were noted in terms of episodes of cough during emergence and extubation. Categorical variables assessed using Fisher's exact test and continuous variables assessed using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Cough suppression was present in Groups A and B, with better results observed with IT than with IV lignocaine. In the control group, Grade III cough reflex was present predominantly. There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) in blood pressure and heart rate between Group A versus Group C and in Group B versus Group C, but not between Group A and Group B. CONCLUSION: IT lignocaine administered before extubation significantly attenuates post-extubation cough reflex than IV lignocaine. Both IT and IV lignocaine can effectively attenuate the airway and hemodynamic response to extubation.

A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice of the same from anaesthesiologists practicing in India is lacking and hence, we conducted this survey. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 16 questions was distributed among a subgroup of anaesthesiologists who attended the 2014 National Conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. The filled-in questionnaires were computed and analysed with SPSS version 11. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 82%. About 73% of the respondents practiced LFA routinely, with 65% having workstations. Most of the anaesthesiologists used fresh gas flows <1.5 L/min with 45.1% using O2 concentrations at a range of 30-40%. ETCO2 monitoring was used routinely by most whereas use of agent analysers and bispectral index monitoring were restricted. The availability of scavenging system was also limited to only 33.5%. Majority preferred N2 O as carrier gas and sevoflurane as volatile agent of their choice. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that practice of LFA in India has numerous lacunae. Provision of better monitoring facilities, workstations as well as awareness regarding the environmental issues of waste anaesthetic gases need to be addressed.