Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 73(3): 960-70, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26382613

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of gadoterate meglumine, a gadolinium-based contrast agent used in magnetic resonance imaging, in neonatal and juvenile rats. Rats received a single intravenous administration on postnatal day (PND) 10 or 6 administrations (from PND 10 to 30), at doses of 0, 0.6, 1.25, and 2.5 mmol/kg/administration, i.e. equivalent to approximately 1, 2 and 4-times the usual human dose. The animals were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period or after a 60-day treatment-free period. No mortality and no significant treatment-related effect on clinical signs, macroscopic and histopathological findings, development, behavior, sexual maturation and hematology parameters were observed. Minor non-adverse changes were observed in clinical biochemistry and urinary parameters. Based on AUC0-t, gadoterate meglumine was more rapidly eliminated at PND 30 vs. PND 10, reflecting maturation of kidney function. At the end of the treatment period, Gd was measurable in all organs sampled after single or repeated dosing and levels were dose-dependent as expected, the highest ones being found in kidneys. The total Gd concentrations were similar in all the organs following a single or repeated dosing. At the end of the treatment-free period, only traces of gadolinium were quantifiable, almost exclusively in kidneys, reflecting the excretory function of this organ. In conclusion, single or repeated administration of gadoterate meglumine to juvenile rats was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media/toxicity , Meglumine/toxicity , Organometallic Compounds/toxicity , Age Factors , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Contrast Media/pharmacokinetics , Drug Administration Schedule , Injections, Intravenous , Meglumine/administration & dosage , Meglumine/pharmacokinetics , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Renal Elimination , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Tissue Distribution
2.
Bioanalysis ; 5(15): 1831-41, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23905857

ABSTRACT

This White Paper is focused on the technical aspects regarding quantifying pharmaceutically derived inorganic elements in biomatrices in support of GLP nonclinical and clinical studies using inductively coupled plasma (ICP) techniques. For decades ICP has been used in support of Environmental Protection Agency analyses and has more recently been applied for use in the pharmaceutical industry. Current bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis regulatory guidance applies to chromatographic platforms used for analysis of large- and small-molecule PK and TK assessments; however, it is not directly applicable to all aspects of various ICP techniques. Increasingly, quadrupole and high-resolution ICP-MS methods of analysis are being used to quantify inorganic elements contained in pharmaceutical compounds and biomatrices. Many elements occur endogenously in biomatrices, affecting quantification of blanks, standard curve samples, QC samples, and the selection of appropriate levels for the LLOQ.


Subject(s)
Drug Discovery/instrumentation , Drug Discovery/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Spectrophotometry, Atomic/instrumentation , Spectrophotometry, Atomic/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/urine , Calibration , Drug Discovery/standards , Elements , Guidelines as Topic , Limit of Detection , Pharmaceutical Preparations/blood , Pharmaceutical Preparations/cerebrospinal fluid , Pharmaceutical Preparations/urine , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Specimen Handling , Spectrophotometry, Atomic/standards , Validation Studies as Topic
3.
Bioanalysis ; 4(16): 1979-87, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22946914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In bioanalysis, including replicate injection of calibration standards, a normal least squares linear regression model can be generated from, A: the first injection dataset; B: the second injection dataset; C: averaged data from both injection datasets; and D: all data from both injections. Sample results, and their estimated confidence intervals, are expected to be different among these four models. RESULTS: Models C and D yield same slopes and intercepts, which are the mathematical means of respective values in models A and B. Relatively narrower confidence intervals on sample results are estimated in both models C and D as the former reduces the overall standard error of the curve and the latter increases the total number of calibration points and leads to a lower Student's t-value. CONCLUSION: Replicate injection of calibration standards provides added benefits for an analytical measurement on instrument sensitivity compensation and relatively improved precision of results.


Subject(s)
Least-Squares Analysis , Linear Models , Mass Spectrometry/statistics & numerical data , Mass Spectrometry/standards , Algorithms , Calibration , Confidence Intervals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL