Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 161(5): 708-726, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35031193

ABSTRACT

Treatment of hemifacial microsomia is challenging and often requires multiple interventions to restore function and facial esthetics. In this article, the combined orthodontic-surgical treatment of a young patient exhibiting Pruzansky I hemifacial microsomia is reported. The patient was aged 15 years, but his bone age was determined to be 18 years. His facial asymmetry was severe, with the nose and a retrusive chin deviated to the left side and a canted smile. The presurgical phase was aimed at centering the mandibular midline to the center of the chin through the distal movement of the mandibular left buccal dentition. The surgery was planned with 3-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation and included a LeFort I and unilateral sagittal split osteotomies combined with a genioplasty. This report illustrates the therapeutic stages and a 4-year follow-up of a unique and complex orthognathic surgical approach, chosen among other alternatives and leading to improved function and appearance and stable results.


Subject(s)
Goldenhar Syndrome , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Facial Asymmetry/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Goldenhar Syndrome/complications , Goldenhar Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Goldenhar Syndrome/surgery , Humans , Mandible/surgery , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 158(3): 343-348, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32709579

ABSTRACT

The general boundaries to tooth movement are within the adjacent compact and trabecular bones, gingiva, mucosa, and muscular envelope. Findings from finite element analysis of maxillary posterior teeth distalization against mini-implants suggest that stiff outer and interproximal compact bone resists tooth movement, regardless of bone thickness, and that teeth should be steered away from this bone during orthodontic treatment. However, individual variation in the tooth-bone interface dictates the course and outcome of treatment, offering the basis for inferences on the limits of mini-implant anchorage and the presumed influence of the regional acceleratory phenomenon through decortication and microperforation, 2 modalities advocated to effect faster tooth movement.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures , Cortical Bone , Maxilla , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Tooth Movement Techniques
3.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 156(3): 326-336, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31474262

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic mini-implants aid in the correction of distocclusions via direct anchorage (pull from mini-implant to teeth) and indirect anchorage (teeth pulled against other teeth anchored by the mini-implant). The aim of this study was to compare stress levels on the periodontal ligament (PDL) of maxillary buccal teeth in direct and indirect distalization against orthodontic mini-implants and accounting for individual variation in maxillary anatomy and biomechanical characteristics of the compact bone. METHODS: A 3D model of the maxilla containing the different components (teeth, PDL, trabecular and cortical bones) was generated from a computed tomographic scan. Cortical bone was divided into several areas according to previously defined zones. Bone stiffness and thickness data, obtained from 11 and 12 cadavers, respectively, were incorporated into the initial model to simulate the individual cortical bone variation at the different locations. Subsequently, a finite element analysis was used to simulate the distalization modalities. RESULTS: Stresses at the buccal, palatal, mesial, and distal surfaces were significantly different between adjacent teeth under stiffness but not thickness variation. In both distalization modalities, low or no significant correlations were found between stress values and corresponding cortical bone thicknesses. High significant and inverted correlations were observed at the first molar between stress amounts and cortical bone stiffness (direct modality: -0.68 < r < -0.72; indirect modality: -0.80 < r < -0.82; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With the use of a novel finite element approach that integrated human data on variations in bone properties, findings suggested that cortical bone stiffness may influence tooth movement more than bone thickness. Significant clinical implications could be related to these findings.


Subject(s)
Dental Stress Analysis/methods , Finite Element Analysis , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Screws , Computer Simulation , Dental Implants , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Models, Anatomic , Molar , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Periodontal Ligament , Stress, Mechanical , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Torsion, Mechanical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...