Experience-based SEEG planning: from retrospective data to automated electrode trajectories suggestions.

StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy (SEEG) is a minimally invasive technique that consists of the insertion of multiple intracranial electrodes to precisely identify the epileptogenic focus. The planning of electrode trajectories is a cumbersome and time-consuming task. Current approaches to support the planning focus on electrode trajectory optimisation based on geometrical constraints but are not helpful to produce an initial electrode set to begin with the planning procedure. In this work, the authors propose a methodology that analyses retrospective planning data and builds a set of average trajectories, representing the practice of a clinical centre, which can be mapped to a new patient to initialise planning procedure. They collected and analysed the data from 75 anonymised patients, obtaining 30 exploratory patterns and 61 mean trajectories in an average brain space. A preliminary validation on a test set showed that they were able to correctly map 90% of those trajectories and, after optimisation, they have comparable or better values than manual trajectories in terms of distance from vessels and insertion angle. Finally, by detecting and analysing similar plans, they were able to identify eight planning strategies, which represent the main tailored sets of trajectories that neurosurgeons used to deal with the different patient cases.

Retrospective evaluation and SEEG trajectory analysis for interactive multi-trajectory planner assistant.

PURPOSE: Focal epilepsy is a neurological disease that can be surgically treated by removing area of the brain generating the seizures. The stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) procedure allows patient brain activity to be recorded in order to localize the onset of seizures through the placement of intracranial electrodes. The planning phase can be cumbersome and very time consuming, and no quantitative information is provided to neurosurgeons regarding the safety and efficacy of their trajectories. In this work, we present a novel architecture specifically designed to ease the SEEG trajectory planning using the 3D Slicer platform as a basis. METHODS: Trajectories are automatically optimized following criteria like vessel distance and insertion angle. Multi-trajectory optimization and conflict resolution are optimized through a selective brute force approach based on a conflict graph construction. Additionally, electrode-specific optimization constraints can be defined, and an advanced verification module allows neurosurgeons to evaluate the feasibility of the trajectory. RESULTS: A retrospective evaluation was performed using manually planned trajectories on 20 patients: the planning algorithm optimized and improved trajectories in 98% of cases. We were able to resolve and optimize the remaining 2% by applying electrode-specific constraints based on manual planning values. In addition, we found that the global parameters used discards 68% of the manual planned trajectories, even when they represent a safe clinical choice. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach improved manual planned trajectories in 98% of cases in terms of quantitative indexes, even when applying more conservative criteria with respect to actual clinical practice. The improved multi-trajectory strategy overcomes the previous work limitations and allows electrode optimization within a tolerable time span.