ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in nonagenarians, whose numbers have doubled in twenty years. In the absence of recommendations, the place of coronary invasive strategy in this population remains a therapeutic challenge and its interest as well as its risks are poorly established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety of coronary invasive practice in the nonagenarian population for all indications. POPULATION AND METHODS: This was a monocentric case-control study conducted from January 1, 2010 to May 30, 2019. The patients included were all nonagenarians who had undergone coronary angiography at the centre hospitalier de Troyes during this period. For each patient included, two controls matched on sex, date of procedure and procedure were drawn at random. The main judgment criterion was the occurrence of immediate per- or post-procedure complications during the stay in which the procedure was performed. The main secondary outcome measures were average length of stay, occurrence of intercurrent events during the stay (nosocomial infections, confusional syndrome), and loss of autonomy. RESULTS: In all, 59 nonagenarians and 118 controls were included in our study. We identified 30.5% major complications in the nonagenarians versus 10.2% in the controls (P=0.001; OR=0.26 [0.1-0.6]), with a significant difference in the occurrence of cardiogenic shock (P=0.04), heart failure (P=0.02) and ventricular rhythm disorders (P=0.04). Post-procedure acute renal failure was greater in the nonagenarians (P=0.02; OR=0.20 [0.05-1.57]). The mean length of stay was on average twice as long in the nonagenarians. CONCLUSION: Nonagenarian patients are subject to more complications when undergoing coronary invasive procedures compared to patients under 75.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a documented association between drug exposure and sarcoidosis-like reactions. In this study, we used the largest pharmacovigilance database to describe drug-induced sarcoidosis. METHODS: Data were collected from the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). We excluded steroids and vaccines from the analysis. The primary end-point was the lower end-point of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025 ). RESULTS: A total of 127 reports had significant IC025 values for drug-induced sarcoidosis, and 110 were included in the final analysis, accounting for 2425 adverse drug reactions. Overall, 2074 (85.5%) reactions were considered 'serious' and 86 (3.5%) were fatal. Most of the drugs that led to sarcoidosis adverse reactions were TNF-alpha antagonists, interferon or peg-interferon therapeutics, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Other biologic drugs were less frequently associated with sarcoidosis adverse events. Cancer-targeted therapies such as BRAF or MEK inhibitors were associated with sarcoidosis reactions in 37 cases. Pulmonary hypertension drugs were also reported for drug-induced sarcoidosis. Amongst the 55 drugs considered as potential sarcoidosis inducers, 25 (45.4%) were never reported in Medline as drug-induced sarcoidosis. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a detailed list of suspected drugs associated with drug-induced sarcoidosis that will improve the recognition of this drug-induced adverse event.
